The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Probus |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 24 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 10 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #4 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Probus |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 18 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #6 17 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Probus |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 13 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #4 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #3 4 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Amadeus iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) and Probus requires understanding how each addresses your hotel’s specific needs. Both are reservation solutions, but Amadeus’s extensive feature set and industry presence set it apart from Probus. While Probus may appeal for its simplicity or niche use, Amadeus’s larger footprint and more recent reviews give it a distinct advantage. So, which one aligns better with your hotel's growth ambitions?
Amadeus iHotelier stands out as a comprehensive CRS that automates distribution across multiple channels, including GDS, OTA, and mobile, all from a single platform. Probus, by contrast, offers a reservation system with no publicly available review data or feature details, making it difficult to compare directly. Given Amadeus’s 52 recent reviews and high overall score, it clearly has a broader hotel user base and more established market presence. Does your hotel need an all-in-one solution with proven scalability?
Amadeus’s reviews highlight strong user satisfaction with ease of use, customer support, and feature depth, whereas Probus has no publicly available user feedback. Amadeus’s recent reviews reinforce its position as a trusted industry leader, while Probus’s lack of review data suggests it’s less tested in the field. If your hotel prioritizes stability, extensive features, and community feedback, Amadeus is the safer choice. Do you prefer a well-supported platform with a global footprint?
If your hotel requires a feature-rich CRS with integrated booking engine, channel management, and revenue management tools, go with Amadeus. Its 18 unique features, including a booking engine, metasearch connectivity, rate management, and multi-property support, are unmatched by Probus’s unspecified offerings. For hotels looking to maximize distribution channels and streamline operations, Amadeus provides a clear advantage.
On the other hand, if your hotel seeks a very simple, perhaps localized reservation system with minimal complexity and no need for extensive integrations or advanced features, Probus might be suitable. However, without review data or detailed features, it’s difficult to recommend Probus confidently. For most hotels aiming for growth and competitive edge, Amadeus’s proven capabilities make it the better choice.
Amadeus’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.43/5, with reviews citing a user-friendly interface after initial training and good onboarding support. Hotel staff have found it straightforward after some practice, though some initial learning curve exists. In contrast, there are no available usability ratings or reviews for Probus, making it impossible to assess its user-friendliness.
Given the detailed positive feedback on Amadeus’s UI and onboarding process, it clearly offers a more accessible experience for your team. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus boasts 18 distinct features, including a booking engine, channel management, RMS connectivity, geotargeted pricing, and support for complex rate structures. Probus, however, offers no publicly listed or verified features, making its capabilities uncertain. The feature depth of Amadeus allows your hotel to manage reservations, rates, and distribution from a single platform.
If your hotel needs advanced features like metasearch connectivity, multi-property management, or centralized user management, Amadeus’s comprehensive suite is unmatched. Without verified features from Probus, Amadeus is clearly the more capable choice. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s support receives a 4.15/5 rating based on recent reviews, with hotelier feedback emphasizing helpful, professional, and responsive service. Many reviews mention that support is generally prompt and knowledgeable, though some note room for improvement in regional support and training options.
Probus has no available data on customer support or recent reviews, making it impossible to assess. Given the critical importance of reliable support for your hotel’s operations, Amadeus’s established support structure provides more confidence. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus integrates with 104 verified partners, including major PMS, channel managers, and distribution platforms. Shared integrations are minimal, but Amadeus’s extensive partner network ensures your hotel can connect with most systems you already use or plan to adopt.
Probus offers no listed or verified integrations, limiting its appeal for hotels with existing technology stacks. If your hotel relies on multiple systems working together, the breadth of Amadeus’s integrations is a significant advantage. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s overall rating of 4.57/5 and NPS of 8.38/10 reflect strong recent user satisfaction, especially from mid-scale and independent hotels. Hotels in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific highly rate its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Probus has no publicly available reviews or ratings, so hotel feedback cannot be assessed. If your hotel values community insights and proven performance, Amadeus’s higher ratings are a decisive factor. Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly disclosed. Amadeus typically offers custom quotes based on hotel size and needs, with no mention of freemium or subscription plans. Probus’s pricing is similarly unavailable, which is common for niche or less-established systems.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your team should request quotes for both solutions. However, the proven value and extensive feature set of Amadeus suggest it is a worthwhile investment for hotels aiming for growth.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Amadeus iHotelier offers a comprehensive, highly-rated reservation platform with extensive features, integrations, and global presence. Its recent reviews and high user satisfaction make it the safer, more proven choice for most hotels looking to grow and optimize revenue.
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich CRS capable of supporting complex operations and expanding distribution channels, go with Amadeus. Its broad support network and proven track record justify its premium positioning.
However, if your hotel’s needs are minimal, or you seek a simple, easy-to-manage reservation system without complex integrations, Probus might suffice—but with the caveat that little public data supports its effectiveness. For most hotels with growth ambitions, Amadeus remains the definitive recommendation.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强... TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强调了较长的集成时间和一些需要改进的可用性挑战。
对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的... 对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的更新,才能保持与时俱进和直观。
TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成... TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成部分。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了... TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了在各个地区提供本地支持和更多培训选项的必要性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 和 Probus 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Probus 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS):否。Probus:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 79,Probus 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问