The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 53 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Reporting Dashboard.
Xn protel Systems 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Sales Reporting and Employee Reporting and Management.
基于 HTR 上 53 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 53 | 0 |
在分析了 53 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 集成和可用性, 创新与更新, 分析和报告,而 Xn protel Systems 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
集成和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
创新与更新
▾
|
|
|
+
分析和报告
▾
|
|
|
+
收入和定价策略
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
客户支持
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 24 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 10 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #4 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 18 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #6 17 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 13 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #4 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #3 4 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Amadeus iHotelier® CRS and XN Protel Systems (XnCRS) hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, size, and regional presence. Both aim to simplify reservation management and boost direct bookings, but their approaches, features, and reputation differ significantly. To make an informed decision, you need to understand how each product aligns with your operational priorities and growth plans.
Amadeus iHotelier® CRS is a well-established, widely adopted platform with a robust global footprint and a large user base. XnCRS offers a flexible, cloud-native alternative that appeals primarily to hotels seeking seamless distribution without extensive regional support. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s scale and market focus?
Amadeus iHotelier® CRS is the stronger choice given its higher review count (52 reviews) and recent positive feedback, especially in North America and Europe. Its 4.57/5 overall rating and 87% likelihood to recommend demonstrate broad satisfaction among hoteliers. XnCRS, with no reviews and limited regional presence, lacks the real-world validation needed to confidently support your decision.
Considering this, if your hotel values proven reliability and extensive support, Amadeus is the clear recommendation. If XnCRS gains more reviews or regional traction, that could change, but for now, Amadeus leads decisively.
Amadeus iHotelier® CRS is a comprehensive platform designed to automate distribution, manage reservations, and optimize revenue across multiple channels, making it suitable for hotels of all sizes looking for a scalable solution. Its extensive integrations (over 104 verified partners) and broad global presence—covering 29 countries—offer confidence in its reach and support.
XnCRS, by contrast, is a cloud-native platform with fewer verified integrations (26 total), primarily targeting online booking service providers, serviced apartments, and smaller hotels. It consolidates multiple reservation channels but lacks the extensive regional deployment and user validation of Amadeus.
Would your hotel prefer a tried-and-tested global system or a newer cloud-native platform with potentially less regional support? Based on current data, Amadeus's larger, more recent review base makes it the more reliable choice for most hotels.
Amadeus iHotelier® CRS boasts a solid user rating of 4.43/5 and positive reviews highlighting its ease of handling and training support. Users mention that it becomes more intuitive after the initial learning curve, with some noting the platform’s complexity at first but appreciating its comprehensive features once mastered.
XnCRS has no publicly available user ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge usability or onboarding quality. Given Amadeus’s proven track record and positive feedback, it clearly offers a more user-friendly experience.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus iHotelier® CRS offers five features unique to its platform, including support for weekly and monthly rates, booking rules, cancellation policies, TMC management, and a reporting dashboard. These features enhance flexibility and control over reservations and revenue management, especially for larger or complex operations.
XnCRS provides six features not found in Amadeus, including on-premise and cloud options, sales reporting, inventory management, customer management, and employee reporting. These are more operationally focused but lack some advanced rate and policy controls.
Considering the breadth and depth, Amadeus’s additional features are more aligned with strategic revenue management needs, giving it an edge in comprehensive control.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus scores 4.15/5 in customer support, with reviews praising its helpful, friendly assistance and responsive service. Users appreciate the onboarding support and ongoing assistance, although some mention delays in responses and the need for more localized support options.
XnCRS lacks any reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess support quality. Without verified feedback, Amadeus’s demonstrated support system clearly provides more confidence for hoteliers.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers 104 verified integration partners, including major players like Profitroom, SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and IDeaS. Its extensive partner network ensures seamless connection with PMS, GDS, OTAs, and marketing platforms.
XnCRS has a smaller network with 26 verified partners, sharing 12 with Amadeus. While it supports critical integrations, it lacks the breadth of Amadeus’s ecosystem, potentially limiting future expansion and connectivity.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus has a 4.57/5 overall rating based on 52 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing usability, comprehensive features, and reliable support. Hotels in North America and Europe especially rate it highly, with some reviews praising its ability to manage complex rates and reservations.
XnCRS has no reviews or ratings, so we cannot compare hotel satisfaction. Given the data, Amadeus’s higher and more recent ratings support its superior standing among hoteliers.
Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing details for both platforms are not publicly available, which is common in enterprise hotel software. Both require direct contact for quotes, and implementation fees may apply. Your team should prepare to evaluate based on value and support rather than advertised prices.
Not ideal if you’re a small, independent property with minimal regional needs or prefer a cloud-native, lightweight solution.
Not ideal if you need a platform with a large global footprint, extensive features, or proven user satisfaction.
The core difference between the two systems is scale and validation. Amadeus iHotelier® CRS is a well-established, review-backed platform with extensive regional support, features, and integrations that cater to medium and large hotels worldwide. XnCRS is a newer, cloud-native solution with fewer reviews and less regional presence, making it less suitable for hotels needing proven support and extensive connectivity.
Choose Amadeus if your hotel operates in multiple regions, requires advanced revenue controls, and values a platform with verified user satisfaction. Opt for XnCRS if your hotel is smaller, less globally distributed, and looking for a flexible, cloud-based reservation solution without complex requirements.
Given the current data, Amadeus’s larger, more recent review base and proven performance make it the preferable choice for most hotels seeking reliable, scalable reservation management.
酒店预订软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 和 XN Protel Systems (XnCRS) 共享 13 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| TMC管理 | ||
| 取消政策 | ||
| 员工报告和管理 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 报告仪表板 | ||
| 支持每周和每月费率 | ||
| 本地 | ||
| 用户管理 | ||
| 销售报告 | ||
| 预订规则 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强... TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强调了较长的集成时间和一些需要改进的可用性挑战。
对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的... 对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的更新,才能保持与时俱进和直观。
TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成... TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成部分。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了... TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了在各个地区提供本地支持和更多培训选项的必要性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 和 XN Protel Systems (XnCRS) 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 XN Protel Systems (XnCRS) 提供 26 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS):否。XN Protel Systems (XnCRS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 79,Xn protel Systems 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问