项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 202 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Proposales 在易用性以及客户支持方面表现出色,尤其适合度假住宿设施(4.9/5)。
基于 HTR 上 202 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $1,000/月 | 起价 $400/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 9 | 193 |
在分析了 202 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 ,而 Proposales 用户则强调 定制化和灵活的提案内容, 快速创建提案,节省时间, 专业设计与客户展示。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
定制化和灵活的提案内容
▾
|
|
|
+
快速创建提案,节省时间
▾
|
|
|
+
专业设计与客户展示
▾
|
|
|
+
支持与产品响应速度
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
内容管理与附件
▾
|
|
|
−
多酒店扩展性与组织结构
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 RFP和提案管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 0 条评价 | #2 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 4 条评价 | #1 80 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 2 条评价 | #1 68 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #7 1 条评价 | #1 26 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 4 条评价 | #1 89 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 4 条评价 | #1 49 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 8 条评价 | #1 82 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #3 1 条评价 | #1 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | #8 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 2 条评价 | #1 181 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #8 0 条评价 | #3 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #5 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Amadeus and Proposales hinges on your hotel’s specific proposal needs, integration requirements, and overall budget. Both aim to streamline RFPs and proposal management but diverge significantly in user experience, feature set, and market presence. Amadeus offers a historically larger footprint with a focus on integrated sales solutions, whereas Proposales excels with a modern, user-friendly interface and rapid adoption. Which aligns better with your team’s priorities?
Amadeus’s suite is tailored for hotels already invested in Amadeus’s broader ecosystem, offering deep integration but limited flexibility. Proposales, on the other hand, provides a standalone, highly-rated platform praised for ease of use and rapid results. Your decision should weigh these core differences carefully.
Amadeus is designed for large, complex hotel groups seeking an integrated sales platform, emphasizing direct data flow from inquiries to proposals. Its main strength lies in its deep integration with Amadeus Sales & Catering Solutions – Delphi, enabling quick, data-driven proposals with minimal manual input.
Proposales targets hotels and venues that prioritize speed, visual impact, and ease of use, with a modern interface that simplifies proposal creation. While Amadeus’s platform has more extensive historical use, recent reviews favor Proposales’ current user ratings and recent activity—more recent reviews bolster confidence in Proposales’s current performance.
Are you looking for an integrated system that fits into existing enterprise workflows, or a flexible, standalone tool that can be adopted quickly? The choice depends on your hotel’s operational complexity and tech stack.
If your hotel needs quick, attractive proposals with minimal training, go with Proposales. Its high user ratings (4.72/5 overall, 4.81/5 ease of use) reflect a modern, intuitive experience suitable even for smaller teams.
If your hotel requires deep system integrations, comprehensive reporting, and operates within a larger ecosystem like Amadeus, then Amadeus is the better fit. Despite its lower ratings (1.88/5 overall, 3.39/5 ease of use), it’s the choice for hotels already aligned with Amadeus solutions.
For hotels with limited sales staff and a focus on rapid proposal turnaround, Proposales provides a clear advantage. Conversely, if your hotel relies on robust data flow and enterprise integration, Amadeus’s broader system might justify its higher complexity.
Proposales scores significantly higher on usability, with a 4.81/5 rating for ease of use, and recent reviews emphasize its user-friendly, modern interface. Users find onboarding straightforward, with many mentioning how quickly their teams adapt and start producing proposals.
Amadeus’s interface is rated at 3.39/5, with reviews pointing out it’s less intuitive and sometimes cumbersome, especially given its older technology base. Support and onboarding ratings are also lower, with some users citing difficulty navigating the platform and inconsistent support.
Edge: Proposales.
Proposales offers 11 shared features with Amadeus but includes several unique capabilities, such as multimedia attachments, customizable templates, and follow-up reminders, which facilitate a more engaging proposal process. Amadeus, however, focuses on direct integration with its sales and catering systems, automating data transfer and reducing manual input.
Proposales’s features are praised for their visual appeal and ease of customization, making proposals more attractive and personalized. Amadeus’s strength lies in its integration capabilities, but its feature set appears more limited and less innovative, as reflected in recent reviews criticizing its reporting and technical support.
Edge: Proposales.
Proposales scores an impressive 4.78/5 in support and onboarding, with reviews highlighting fast, helpful, and solution-oriented service. Customers note that onboarding is smooth and support is highly responsive, especially regarding platform customization.
Amadeus’s support ratings are lower, at 2.72/5, with reviews citing slow responses, difficulty resolving issues, and support staff sometimes lacking product knowledge. Several users describe the customer experience as frustrating, especially around system bugs and limited troubleshooting.
Edge: Proposales.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including major hotel technology providers like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Profitroom, offering a broad integration landscape. Proposales supports only 7 verified partners, including vital integrations like Super Office CRM and Stripe, but lacks the extensive ecosystem Amadeus offers.
While Amadeus’s integrations cater to large enterprise needs, Proposales’s limited but targeted integrations are sufficient for many hotels seeking rapid deployment and simple workflows. If your hotel relies heavily on multiple systems, Amadeus’s broader network is advantageous.
Edge: Amadeus.
Proposales’s recent reviews reflect a 4.77/5 rating from 149 hotel users, predominantly in Europe and North America. Hotels across segments—especially boutique and city center hotels—praise its speed, aesthetics, and ease of use, with comments like “faster accepts and easier follow-ups.”
Amadeus’s reviews are fewer and more mixed, with an overall rating of 1.88/5 and many negative comments about support, usability, and outdated technology. Hotels that have used Amadeus often describe it as cumbersome and lacking in current functionality.
Edge: Proposales.
Amadeus’s base price is $1,000 per month, with no freemium option or trial available, making it a significant investment. Proposales charges $400 per month, with no implementation fee or trial, offering a more accessible entry point.
While Amadeus’s higher cost may reflect its broader system integration, Proposales’s lower price combined with high user satisfaction suggests better value for hotels prioritizing speed and usability over extensive enterprise features.
Hotels that should consider Amadeus include:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that benefit from Proposales include:
Not ideal if:
Amadeus offers an extensive ecosystem with deep integrations, making it suitable for large hotels and chains already invested in its platform. Its older interface and limited recent reviews suggest it’s less appealing for hotels seeking user-friendly, modern proposals.
Proposales is a clear winner for hotels prioritizing ease of use, speed, and modern presentation. Its high ratings, recent positive reviews, and lower cost make it the best choice for hotels looking to modernize proposal workflows quickly and effectively.
Choose Amadeus if your hotel needs comprehensive system integration and operates at a scale that justifies its complexity. Opt for Proposales if your goal is to boost proposal efficiency, enhance visual impact, and improve user satisfaction with a straightforward platform.
This detailed comparison should guide your team toward the product that best aligns with your operational needs, technological environment, and customer engagement goals.
RFP和提案管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $1,000/月 | 起价 $400/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
提案、合同和签名
|
|
|
| 数字签名 | ||
| 动态定价 | ||
| 模板库 | ||
|
▾
网上预订
|
|
|
| 实时实时可用性 | ||
| 网站预订引擎 | ||
|
▾
付款和发票
|
|
|
| 在线支付 | ||
| 动态定价 | ||
|
▾
内容管理
|
|
|
| 模板库 | ||
| 内容和文件管理 | ||
|
▾
客户关系管理和消息传递
|
|
|
| 响应管理 | ||
| 团队协作 | ||
| 阅读收据和警报 | ||
| 模板库 | ||
| 自动回复 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 阅读收据和警报 | ||
| 团队协作 |
排名更高的方面
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评价提到能够通过图片、文本、价格、增值税、模板和特定优惠内容来定制提案。用户喜欢Proposales能够适应不同客户需求和市场,尽管有些用户希望能有更细致的... 许多评价提到能够通过图片、文本、价格、增值税、模板和特定优惠内容来定制提案。用户喜欢Proposales能够适应不同客户需求和市场,尽管有些用户希望能有更细致的编辑功能、拖放排列以及无需重建提案即可轻松进行一次性修改。
用户最常提到Proposales显著加快了报价和提案的创建速度,使酒店团队能够在几分钟内完成复杂的报价,而不是几个小时。这减少了手动行政工作,缩短了对买家的响应... 用户最常提到Proposales显著加快了报价和提案的创建速度,使酒店团队能够在几分钟内完成复杂的报价,而不是几个小时。这减少了手动行政工作,缩短了对买家的响应时间,并帮助销售团队在不增加人员的情况下处理更高的工作量。
评论者多次强调Proposales提案的精致、现代且视觉吸引力强的外观。他们表示,品牌形象、布局和图形帮助酒店呈现更高端的形象,设定正确的预期,并使客户更容易理... 评论者多次强调Proposales提案的精致、现代且视觉吸引力强的外观。他们表示,品牌形象、布局和图形帮助酒店呈现更高端的形象,设定正确的预期,并使客户更容易理解和信任报价。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
多条评论提到能够管理可重复使用的内容,如模板、图片、视频、PDF和提案中的附件。用户喜欢共享内容库带来的效率,但也有用户反映文件上传、内容排序以及对更丰... 多条评论提到能够管理可重复使用的内容,如模板、图片、视频、PDF和提案中的附件。用户喜欢共享内容库带来的效率,但也有用户反映文件上传、内容排序以及对更丰富媒体或更便捷重用的需求存在痛点。
一小部分但重要的评价指出,Proposales 对单一酒店表现良好,但在支持大型酒店集团、区域报告和更复杂结构方面需要加强。这些用户希望工具在连锁和集群间具备更... 一小部分但重要的评价指出,Proposales 对单一酒店表现良好,但在支持大型酒店集团、区域报告和更复杂结构方面需要加强。这些用户希望工具在连锁和集群间具备更好的扩展性,以支持集中销售运营,同时保持灵活性。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus (Sales & Event Management - eProposal) 和 Proposales 共享许多核心 RFPs & Proposal Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus (Sales & Event Management - eProposal) 提供 107 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Proposales 提供 6 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Proposales 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 3.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus (Sales & Event Management - eProposal):否。Proposales:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 RFPs & Proposal Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 0,Proposales 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐