The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 188 条经验证的评价后,Amenitiz 用户最看重其 ,而 Exely 用户则强调 支持与培训, direct booking enhancement, 用户友好界面。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持与培训
▾
|
|
|
+
Direct Booking Enhancement
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
移动优化
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
Seamless Integration
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 34 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 64 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #15 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #15 28 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #16 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #16 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #24 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #25 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #4 79 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #2 17 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly influence your hotel’s revenue, guest experience, and operational efficiency. Amenitiz Booking Engine and Exely Booking Engine address the core need for direct bookings but diverge sharply in overall performance, features, and user satisfaction. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize recent reviews and a higher user rating or a broader feature set.
While Amenitiz offers a simplified, largely unreviewed platform, Exely has amassed a strong reputation with hundreds of recent positive reviews. Do you want a well-supported, proven solution or a niche tool with extensive capabilities? Let’s compare both more closely.
Amenitiz's booking engine aims to boost direct bookings through a clean, mobile-first interface, but recent reviews question its reliability and support quality. Exely, on the other hand, is praised for its seamless operation, with 75 recent reviews from hotels praising its ease of use and marketing tools, earning it a high 92.86 score on the HT Score.
Amenitiz’s ratings are dismal—0.5/5 overall, with only 2 reviews, none recent—suggesting weak performance and poor support. Conversely, Exely’s 166 reviews and a 4.9/5 ease of use rating indicate a solution that is trusted and frequently used, making Exely the more dependable choice. Are you willing to risk a less-reviewed product, or do recent, positive hotel feedback matter more?
If your hotel needs a robust, feature-rich booking platform that can handle multi-channel distribution, upselling, and detailed reporting, Exely is the clear pick. It caters well to hotels seeking advanced customization, marketing tools, and strong integration options, especially in mid-to-large properties or chains.
If your hotel is small, looking for a simple, budget-friendly solution that requires minimal setup, Amenitiz might seem appealing—though its poor reviews and lack of recent feedback cast doubt. Given the current data, Exely’s proven track record and extensive feature set make it the safer, smarter choice for most hoteliers.
Amenitiz’s ease of use scores 2.75/5, with reviews indicating significant challenges during onboarding and support issues. Reviewers mention the platform’s limited customization and slow responsiveness, often citing difficulties adapting the system to specific hotel structures.
Exely boasts a near-perfect 4.9/5 score for usability, with reviews highlighting an intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and excellent support. Users appreciate the minimal learning curve and responsiveness, which facilitates staff adoption and daily operation. Edge: Exely.
Amenitiz’s platform offers only one unique feature—its integrated booking engine—lacking advanced options. In contrast, Exely provides 29 features, including multi-lingual support, rate plan comparisons, booking abandonment recovery, multi-currency, Google Hotel Ads integration, and customizable add-ons.
While Amenitiz is limited mostly to essential booking functions, Exely’s broader feature set enables more sophisticated marketing, revenue management, and guest engagement strategies. For hotels aiming for a comprehensive digital toolkit, Exely’s feature count gives it a decisive edge.
Amenitiz scores 2.25/5 for customer support, with reviews describing difficulties in resolving issues and slow response times. Some hotel managers report frustration with the support team, which hampers onboarding and day-to-day use.
Exely excels with a 4.95/5 support rating, with reviews emphasizing prompt, friendly, and knowledgeable assistance. Hotels mention that Exely’s team proactively helps optimize their booking processes and marketing efforts. Edge: Exely.
Amenitiz’s platform integrates with 5 verified partners, including Lightspeed and CheKin, but with limited scope. Exely, with 8 verified integrations, connects with major players like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, Booking.com, and others, offering broader operational flexibility.
With more extensive integration options, Exely supports a wider range of PMS, channel managers, and online platforms, enabling hotels to streamline workflows more effectively. Edge: Exely.
Recent reviews show Amenitiz’s hotel users are overwhelmingly dissatisfied—its 0.5/5 rating and only 2 reviews indicate a lack of trust or positive experience. Hotels that reviewed Exely, however, rate it near perfect, with a 4.9/5 score, and 75 recent reviews.
Large and boutique hotels alike praise Exely for stability, ease of use, and support responsiveness, whereas Amenitiz’s reviews are mostly negative and outdated. For hotelier confidence, Exely clearly leads.
Amenitiz’s pricing details are not publicly available, suggesting a more opaque or custom quote-based approach. Exely charges $200 monthly, with no free trial or setup fees, providing clarity and predictability.
Given Exely’s transparent pricing and extensive functionality, it offers better value for hotels that want predictable costs and comprehensive features. Amenitiz’s unclear pricing model makes budgeting more difficult.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced features like multi-lingual support, upselling, or detailed analytics. Also, avoid if reliable support and recent user feedback are critical.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very limited budget and only requires basic booking functionality. Also, hotels with minimal online presence may find the platform overly complex.
Exely stands out as the more credible and feature-rich platform due to its high review count, recent positive feedback, and comprehensive capabilities. It is best suited for hotels seeking growth, automation, and seamless integrations.
Amenitiz, with only two old reviews and a questionable support reputation, appears unsuitable for hotels aiming for reliability and advanced digital marketing. If you want proven performance and ongoing support, Exely is the clear recommendation.
In summary: For most hotels prioritizing recent reviews, extensive features, and support, Exely offers a safer, more effective option. Amenitiz might appeal to very small properties with minimal needs but remains risky given its limited user feedback and support concerns.
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Exely 的支持团队因其响应迅速、提供详尽的帮助和清晰的解决方案而广受好评。然而,新用户提到需要培训资料来更好地使用高级功能。
Exely substantially increases direct bookings, aiding hotels like Jimbaran Bay Beach Resort, and reducing OTA dependencies. Hotels report significant... Exely substantially increases direct bookings, aiding hotels like Jimbaran Bay Beach Resort, and reducing OTA dependencies. Hotels report significant sales growth, citing simplified operations, increased guest control, and promotional features.
该平台直观且条理清晰的界面被认为是其主要优势,提升了导航体验和用户体验。一些评论建议增加更现代化、可定制化的界面,以增强用户参与度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users often call for advanced reporting and detailed analytics, seeking comprehensive insights for better performance tracking. While some find existi... Users often call for advanced reporting and detailed analytics, seeking comprehensive insights for better performance tracking. While some find existing features satisfactory, many desire deeper filtering and customization options.
用户评论普遍反映,预订小部件和网站设计需要更多自定义选项。用户反映设计灵活性不足,这可能会影响品牌独特性和对顾客的吸引力。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amenitiz Booking Engine 和 Exely Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amenitiz Booking Engine 提供 5 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Booking Engine 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 3.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amenitiz Booking Engine:否。Exely Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amenitiz 的 HT Score 为 0,Exely 的为 93。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案