The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 323 条经验证的评价后,Cendyn 用户最看重其 响应支持团队, 易于使用, 动态定价,而 Exely 用户则强调 支持与响应, 预订引擎效率, 直接预订增强。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
响应支持团队
▾
|
+
支持与响应
▾
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
预订引擎效率
▾
|
|
+
动态定价
▾
|
+
直接预订增强
▾
|
|
+
与 PMS/CMS/CRM 集成
▾
|
+
通道管理器同步
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订引擎定制
▾
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
集成和高级功能
▾
|
|
−
接口连接问题
▾
|
−
宾客体验问题
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #17 25 条评价 | #15 34 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #12 59 条评价 | #11 64 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 27 条评价 | #22 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 28 条评价 | #8 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 84 条评价 | #15 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 64 条评价 | #15 28 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 41 条评价 | #16 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 15 条评价 | #16 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 108 条评价 | #24 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #18 9 条评价 | #25 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #18 7 条评价 | #4 79 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #19 2 条评价 | #2 17 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel’s direct revenue and operational efficiency. Both Cendyn Booking Engine and Exely Booking Engine aim to increase direct bookings and streamline your reservation process, but they diverge significantly in their overall features, user experiences, and market presence. Your decision hinges on which platform aligns better with your property’s size, complexity, and growth ambitions.
Cendyn offers a more established presence, with broader integration and a larger, more diverse user base, while Exely boasts a superior recent review score, especially for ease of use and support. Which product will truly meet your hotel’s needs?
Cendyn’s Booking Engine has been around since 1996, with over 124 reviews, including recent feedback from over 60 users in the last six months, demonstrating ongoing customer engagement. Its reviews highlight strengths like dynamic pricing, cross-selling, and multi-property capabilities, making it a solid choice for larger, multi-property operators aiming for sophisticated revenue management.
Exely’s platform, although newer (founded in 2023), has accumulated 144 reviews—more recent and more positive overall. Its high review scores reflect a top-tier ease of use, support, and value perception, especially among independent hotels and smaller chains looking for straightforward, user-friendly solutions.
Both products solve the core problem: increasing direct bookings and simplifying online reservations. However, Cendyn emphasizes advanced merchandising and multi-channel marketing, whereas Exely focuses on guest engagement and ease of management. Which approach matches your hotel’s growth strategy?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, feature-rich booking engine with extensive integrations, robust multi-property management, and advanced revenue tools, go with Cendyn. It’s best suited for larger properties, resorts, and branded hotels that require detailed reporting, multi-lingual options, loyalty integrations, and cross-property upselling.
If your hotel values simplicity, quick onboarding, and high responsiveness, choose Exely. It’s ideal for independent hotels or small chains prioritizing usability, rapid setup, and strong customer support, especially if budget-conscious with a focus on direct booking growth.
Your choice depends on your operational complexity: for enterprise-level management, Cendyn is the better fit; for streamlined, guest-focused processes, Exely excels.
Cendyn’s ease of use scores 4.36/5, with many users citing a user-friendly dashboard and manageable onboarding, but some mention interface connectivity hiccups and cumbersome photo uploads. Its comprehensive features can sometimes make the platform feel complex for new staff.
Exely outperforms with a 4.91/5 rating for ease of use, driven by a modern, intuitive interface praised by recent reviews. Users highlight how quickly staff can learn and manage rates, availability, and reservations without extensive training. Support responsiveness also enhances the onboarding experience.
Edge: Exely.
Cendyn offers 39 total features—15 exclusive to the platform—including multi-lingual support, ADA compliance, loyalty integrations, special offers, and social media booking. These enable sophisticated merchandising, dynamic pricing, and cross-property upselling, catering well to larger hotel groups.
Exely provides 29 features—5 unique ones—such as rate plan comparisons, room substitutions, and PayPal integration. While it covers core booking functions effectively, it lacks some advanced merchandising options present in Cendyn.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn’s customer support scores 4.56/5, with reviews praising its helpfulness and responsiveness, although some users note support can be inconsistent. Support is generally seen as strong, especially in onboarding, but occasional delays are mentioned.
Exely’s support outshines with a 4.96/5 score, with recent reviews emphasizing prompt, friendly, and effective assistance. Users report that the team is highly responsive and eager to help improve their booking experience, which is critical for smaller hotels.
Edge: Exely.
Cendyn boasts 116 verified partner integrations, including major PMS and CRS systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and IDeaS, making it highly adaptable for complex tech stacks. Its broad integration ecosystem ensures smooth data flow across systems.
Exely has only 8 verified partners, with notable shared integrations like Booking.com and Hotellab. While functional, its limited ecosystem may restrict scalability for larger, multi-system hotels.
Edge: Cendyn.
Recent reviews show Exely’s 92.7 HT Score and 98% likelihood to recommend, reflecting higher satisfaction among users, especially in the last six months. Its ease of use, support, and value are consistently praised.
Cendyn’s scores, while respectable (74.6 HT Score, 88% recommendation), are based on broader, older data, with fewer recent reviews. Its more complex interface and feature set can be overwhelming for some users.
Edge: Exely.
Cendyn’s base pricing starts at $400/month, with no freemium or trial options indicated—likely making it more suitable for larger budgets. Its higher cost reflects its enterprise capabilities and extensive features.
Exely costs $200/month, with no trial or freemium, offering a budget-friendly option for small to mid-sized hotels seeking quick deployment and straightforward functionality.
Not ideal if your hotel is small or local, with limited technical resources, or if budget is a primary concern.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive multi-property management, advanced merchandising, or integration with complex enterprise systems.
Cendyn's Booking Engine is a comprehensive platform tailored for large, multi-property, or enterprise hotels. It excels in integrations, merchandising, and detailed analytics, but its complexity and cost may be prohibitive for smaller operations.
Exely offers a modern, user-friendly, and highly rated booking engine that suits independent and small-chain hotels aiming for straightforward deployment and excellent support. Its simplicity and affordability make it ideal for properties seeking quick wins in direct bookings.
If your hotel needs robust features, multi-channel marketing, and extensive integrations, Cendyn is the clear choice. But if your focus is on ease of use, rapid onboarding, and high support quality, Exely is the better fit.
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Pegasus CRS has ensured that our direct booking channels remain competitive at all times. We create and update all our rate plans first in the CRS and then we distribute these to o..."
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队因其快速有效的帮助而获得一致好评。许多用户注意到,他们的疑问得到了快速解决,并且团队愿意定制并帮助解决技术难题,这对于保持酒店不间断运营至关重... 支持团队因其快速有效的帮助而获得一致好评。许多用户注意到,他们的疑问得到了快速解决,并且团队愿意定制并帮助解决技术难题,这对于保持酒店不间断运营至关重要。
许多用户都对 Pegasus CRS 及其预订引擎的易用性赞不绝口。界面被描述为用户友好型,允许快速更新规则、费率和限制。酒店经营者指出,它对新员工和经验丰富的员... 许多用户都对 Pegasus CRS 及其预订引擎的易用性赞不绝口。界面被描述为用户友好型,允许快速更新规则、费率和限制。酒店经营者指出,它对新员工和经验丰富的员工来说都很直观,可加快入职和日常运营。
动态定价功能经常被提及为 Pegasus CRS 的一大优势。酒店经营者强调其能够灵活地快速实施不同的价格计划和促销活动,这有助于迅速响应市场需求并通过更好的定价... 动态定价功能经常被提及为 Pegasus CRS 的一大优势。酒店经营者强调其能够灵活地快速实施不同的价格计划和促销活动,这有助于迅速响应市场需求并通过更好的定价策略优化收入。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Pegasus 预订引擎提供高水平的定制,使酒店能够将预订流程与品牌保持一致。不过,一些用户建议进一步改进定制选项,特别是关于支付网关和其他增强功能的集成。
虽然详细的报告工具受到赞赏,但一些用户认为报告功能可以增强。具体要求包括更多可自定义的报告、更好的深入选项以及改进的整体可用性,以帮助酒店经营者做出更... 虽然详细的报告工具受到赞赏,但一些用户认为报告功能可以增强。具体要求包括更多可自定义的报告、更好的深入选项以及改进的整体可用性,以帮助酒店经营者做出更明智的决策。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Exely 的支持团队以其快速响应和以解决方案为导向的服务而备受赞誉,从而显著提升了用户体验。这被视为该产品的一大优势。
Exely的预订引擎因其用户友好性、运行速度快以及显著提升直接预订量的能力而备受赞誉,从而有助于收入增长。它被认为对提升宾客体验和转化率具有强大的积极影响... Exely的预订引擎因其用户友好性、运行速度快以及显著提升直接预订量的能力而备受赞誉,从而有助于收入增长。它被认为对提升宾客体验和转化率具有强大的积极影响。
该软件因增加直接预订量并降低对在线旅行社 (OTA) 的依赖而备受赞誉。这通过降低第三方费用和高效的预订管理带来投资回报,从而对酒店收入产生积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户反复反映的一个关键问题是自定义选项有限,尤其是在报表和网站设计方面。用户希望能够更灵活地调整模板和报表,以满足自身需求。
用户希望看到与其他酒店管理系统的集成能力得到提升。目前的集成限制被视为一个缺点,制约了平台全部潜力的发挥。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cendyn Booking Engine 和 Exely Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cendyn Booking Engine 提供 116 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Booking Engine 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cendyn Booking Engine:否。Exely Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cendyn 的 HT Score 为 75,Exely 的为 93。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问