项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 419 条经验证的评价后,Cendyn 用户最看重其 响应支持团队, 易于使用, 动态定价,而 Exely 用户则强调 支持响应速度和账户指导, 速度、稳定性与日常运营的便捷性, 预订引擎的易用性与客人转化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
响应支持团队
▾
|
+
支持响应速度和账户指导
▾
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
速度、稳定性与日常运营的便捷性
▾
|
|
+
动态定价
▾
|
+
预订引擎的易用性与客人转化
▾
|
|
+
与 PMS/CMS/CRM 集成
▾
|
+
直接预订与收入增长
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订引擎定制
▾
|
−
报告与分析深度
▾
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
设计、品牌和定制限制
▾
|
|
−
接口连接问题
▾
|
−
集成与PMS连接
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #17 25 条评价 | #15 34 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #12 59 条评价 | #11 64 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 27 条评价 | #22 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 28 条评价 | #8 6 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 84 条评价 | #15 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 64 条评价 | #15 28 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 41 条评价 | #16 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 15 条评价 | #16 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 108 条评价 | #24 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #18 9 条评价 | #25 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #18 7 条评价 | #4 79 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #19 2 条评价 | #2 17 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel’s direct revenue and operational efficiency. Both Cendyn Booking Engine and Exely Booking Engine aim to increase direct bookings and streamline your reservation process, but they diverge significantly in their overall features, user experiences, and market presence. Your decision hinges on which platform aligns better with your property’s size, complexity, and growth ambitions.
Cendyn offers a more established presence, with broader integration and a larger, more diverse user base, while Exely boasts a superior recent review score, especially for ease of use and support. Which product will truly meet your hotel’s needs?
Cendyn’s Booking Engine has been around since 1996, with over 124 reviews, including recent feedback from over 60 users in the last six months, demonstrating ongoing customer engagement. Its reviews highlight strengths like dynamic pricing, cross-selling, and multi-property capabilities, making it a solid choice for larger, multi-property operators aiming for sophisticated revenue management.
Exely’s platform, although newer (founded in 2023), has accumulated 144 reviews—more recent and more positive overall. Its high review scores reflect a top-tier ease of use, support, and value perception, especially among independent hotels and smaller chains looking for straightforward, user-friendly solutions.
Both products solve the core problem: increasing direct bookings and simplifying online reservations. However, Cendyn emphasizes advanced merchandising and multi-channel marketing, whereas Exely focuses on guest engagement and ease of management. Which approach matches your hotel’s growth strategy?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, feature-rich booking engine with extensive integrations, robust multi-property management, and advanced revenue tools, go with Cendyn. It’s best suited for larger properties, resorts, and branded hotels that require detailed reporting, multi-lingual options, loyalty integrations, and cross-property upselling.
If your hotel values simplicity, quick onboarding, and high responsiveness, choose Exely. It’s ideal for independent hotels or small chains prioritizing usability, rapid setup, and strong customer support, especially if budget-conscious with a focus on direct booking growth.
Your choice depends on your operational complexity: for enterprise-level management, Cendyn is the better fit; for streamlined, guest-focused processes, Exely excels.
Cendyn’s ease of use scores 4.36/5, with many users citing a user-friendly dashboard and manageable onboarding, but some mention interface connectivity hiccups and cumbersome photo uploads. Its comprehensive features can sometimes make the platform feel complex for new staff.
Exely outperforms with a 4.91/5 rating for ease of use, driven by a modern, intuitive interface praised by recent reviews. Users highlight how quickly staff can learn and manage rates, availability, and reservations without extensive training. Support responsiveness also enhances the onboarding experience.
Edge: Exely.
Cendyn offers 39 total features—15 exclusive to the platform—including multi-lingual support, ADA compliance, loyalty integrations, special offers, and social media booking. These enable sophisticated merchandising, dynamic pricing, and cross-property upselling, catering well to larger hotel groups.
Exely provides 29 features—5 unique ones—such as rate plan comparisons, room substitutions, and PayPal integration. While it covers core booking functions effectively, it lacks some advanced merchandising options present in Cendyn.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn’s customer support scores 4.56/5, with reviews praising its helpfulness and responsiveness, although some users note support can be inconsistent. Support is generally seen as strong, especially in onboarding, but occasional delays are mentioned.
Exely’s support outshines with a 4.96/5 score, with recent reviews emphasizing prompt, friendly, and effective assistance. Users report that the team is highly responsive and eager to help improve their booking experience, which is critical for smaller hotels.
Edge: Exely.
Cendyn boasts 116 verified partner integrations, including major PMS and CRS systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and IDeaS, making it highly adaptable for complex tech stacks. Its broad integration ecosystem ensures smooth data flow across systems.
Exely has only 8 verified partners, with notable shared integrations like Booking.com and Hotellab. While functional, its limited ecosystem may restrict scalability for larger, multi-system hotels.
Edge: Cendyn.
Recent reviews show Exely’s 92.7 HT Score and 98% likelihood to recommend, reflecting higher satisfaction among users, especially in the last six months. Its ease of use, support, and value are consistently praised.
Cendyn’s scores, while respectable (74.6 HT Score, 88% recommendation), are based on broader, older data, with fewer recent reviews. Its more complex interface and feature set can be overwhelming for some users.
Edge: Exely.
Cendyn’s base pricing starts at $400/month, with no freemium or trial options indicated—likely making it more suitable for larger budgets. Its higher cost reflects its enterprise capabilities and extensive features.
Exely costs $200/month, with no trial or freemium, offering a budget-friendly option for small to mid-sized hotels seeking quick deployment and straightforward functionality.
Not ideal if your hotel is small or local, with limited technical resources, or if budget is a primary concern.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive multi-property management, advanced merchandising, or integration with complex enterprise systems.
Cendyn's Booking Engine is a comprehensive platform tailored for large, multi-property, or enterprise hotels. It excels in integrations, merchandising, and detailed analytics, but its complexity and cost may be prohibitive for smaller operations.
Exely offers a modern, user-friendly, and highly rated booking engine that suits independent and small-chain hotels aiming for straightforward deployment and excellent support. Its simplicity and affordability make it ideal for properties seeking quick wins in direct bookings.
If your hotel needs robust features, multi-channel marketing, and extensive integrations, Cendyn is the clear choice. But if your focus is on ease of use, rapid onboarding, and high support quality, Exely is the better fit.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Pegasus CRS has ensured that our direct booking channels remain competitive at all times. We create and update all our rate plans first in the CRS and then we distribute these to o..."
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
支持团队因其快速有效的帮助而获得一致好评。许多用户注意到,他们的疑问得到了快速解决,并且团队愿意定制并帮助解决技术难题,这对于保持酒店不间断运营至关重... 支持团队因其快速有效的帮助而获得一致好评。许多用户注意到,他们的疑问得到了快速解决,并且团队愿意定制并帮助解决技术难题,这对于保持酒店不间断运营至关重要。
许多用户都对 Pegasus CRS 及其预订引擎的易用性赞不绝口。界面被描述为用户友好型,允许快速更新规则、费率和限制。酒店经营者指出,它对新员工和经验丰富的员... 许多用户都对 Pegasus CRS 及其预订引擎的易用性赞不绝口。界面被描述为用户友好型,允许快速更新规则、费率和限制。酒店经营者指出,它对新员工和经验丰富的员工来说都很直观,可加快入职和日常运营。
动态定价功能经常被提及为 Pegasus CRS 的一大优势。酒店经营者强调其能够灵活地快速实施不同的价格计划和促销活动,这有助于迅速响应市场需求并通过更好的定价... 动态定价功能经常被提及为 Pegasus CRS 的一大优势。酒店经营者强调其能够灵活地快速实施不同的价格计划和促销活动,这有助于迅速响应市场需求并通过更好的定价策略优化收入。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
Pegasus 预订引擎提供高水平的定制,使酒店能够将预订流程与品牌保持一致。不过,一些用户建议进一步改进定制选项,特别是关于支付网关和其他增强功能的集成。
虽然详细的报告工具受到赞赏,但一些用户认为报告功能可以增强。具体要求包括更多可自定义的报告、更好的深入选项以及改进的整体可用性,以帮助酒店经营者做出更... 虽然详细的报告工具受到赞赏,但一些用户认为报告功能可以增强。具体要求包括更多可自定义的报告、更好的深入选项以及改进的整体可用性,以帮助酒店经营者做出更明智的决策。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评价赞扬Exely的支持团队、客户成功团队和账户经理,因其快速回复、清晰指导以及在设置和日常运营中的主动帮助。多家酒店表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间... 许多评价赞扬Exely的支持团队、客户成功团队和账户经理,因其快速回复、清晰指导以及在设置和日常运营中的主动帮助。多家酒店表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,加快了部署速度,并使平台更易于采用和操作。
用户经常提到,Exely通过集中管理预订、价格、房态和客人信息,简化了日常酒店工作。他们也很看重平台的速度和稳定性,尽管少数评论提到在高峰期加载缓慢或偶尔... 用户经常提到,Exely通过集中管理预订、价格、房态和客人信息,简化了日常酒店工作。他们也很看重平台的速度和稳定性,尽管少数评论提到在高峰期加载缓慢或偶尔出现预订流程问题。
预订引擎一直被描述为易于客人使用、响应迅速、移动端友好,并且能有效将网站访客转化为预订。评测者将其简洁的流程、部件和灵活的预订选项与更高的转化率和更好... 预订引擎一直被描述为易于客人使用、响应迅速、移动端友好,并且能有效将网站访客转化为预订。评测者将其简洁的流程、部件和灵活的预订选项与更高的转化率和更好的客人预订体验联系在一起。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户反复提出的主要需求之一是更详细、可定制的报告和分析。用户希望深入了解预订趋势、转化率、收入来源、渠道表现、预订动态、入住率变化以及仪表盘的灵活性,... 用户反复提出的主要需求之一是更详细、可定制的报告和分析。用户希望深入了解预订趋势、转化率、收入来源、渠道表现、预订动态、入住率变化以及仪表盘的灵活性,以便做出更好的商务和定价决策。
许多评论者希望对预订引擎和网站的外观与体验拥有更多控制权,包括颜色、模板、部件、确认邮件、发票和报表布局。Exely 以简洁的设计受到好评,但买家应注意到对... 许多评论者希望对预订引擎和网站的外观与体验拥有更多控制权,包括颜色、模板、部件、确认邮件、发票和报表布局。Exely 以简洁的设计受到好评,但买家应注意到对更深层次品牌定制和更现代、独特网站风格的反复需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cendyn Booking Engine 和 Exely Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cendyn Booking Engine 提供 118 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Booking Engine 提供 9 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cendyn Booking Engine:否。Exely Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cendyn 的 HT Score 为 74,Exely 的为 96。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐