The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #10 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #24 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #18 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #19 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #18 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #20 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #14 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine for your hotel can significantly impact your direct sales, operational efficiency, and guest experience. Angelfish Software and Roiback both target these goals but differ markedly in maturity, features, and regional presence. While Angelfish primarily offers log analysis and website performance insights, Roiback provides a comprehensive booking engine with extensive integrations and features. Which solution better aligns with your hotel’s specific needs?
Angelfish Software is a niche analytics tool designed to optimize your website's performance by analyzing server logs in real-time. Its core strength lies in deep digital insights, helping your team understand user behavior and website usability. Conversely, Roiback is a dedicated booking engine that focuses on increasing direct bookings through features like multi-language support, promotional tools, and seamless integrations with channel managers.
While Angelfish's analytical capabilities are highly praised, it lacks the purpose-built booking features that most hotels seek. Roiback, on the other hand, has more recent reviews, a higher rating, and a broader feature set that directly impacts booking conversions. Do you need detailed website analytics or a tool that actively drives direct reservations?
If your hotel needs a robust booking platform with extensive features, go with Roiback. It is ideal for mid to large hotels, especially those looking to expand their direct sales and improve online visibility. Its 43 reviews with a 4.72/5 customer support rating and a 90% likelihood to recommend make it a proven choice for hotels seeking operational growth.
If your team primarily requires website analytics to optimize user experience and digital marketing, Angelfish might seem appealing. However, it has zero reviews and a 0/5 score, indicating a lack of recent or credible user feedback. For a hotel aiming to boost bookings, Roiback’s more comprehensive and recent review data makes it the stronger candidate.
Angelfish’s interface is designed for technical teams, focusing on log analysis rather than user engagement, with no current review ratings available. This suggests a steep learning curve or limited user adoption. Roiback, however, boasts a 4.49/5 ease of use rating based on recent reviews, with many users citing its intuitive UI and straightforward setup.
Hotels report that Roiback’s onboarding process is smooth, and staff generally adopt it quickly. Conversely, Angelfish’s lack of recent reviews and user feedback makes it difficult to assess usability. Edge: Roiback.
Roiback offers 36 unique features, including mobile responsiveness, urgency messaging, multi-room bookings, multi-lingual support, loyalty programs, and extensive payment options like Apple Pay, Google Pay, and Stripe. It also provides detailed conversion reports, abandoned cart recovery, and social media integrations, all aimed at increasing direct bookings.
Angelfish provides no features beyond its core log analysis capabilities, which are more suited to website performance monitoring than customer engagement or booking. Thus, Roiback’s feature-rich platform directly supports hotel sales and marketing strategies. Edge: Roiback.
There are no recent reviews for Angelfish, making it impossible to evaluate its support and onboarding quality. Roiback, with a stellar 4.72/5 support rating, is praised for its responsiveness and personalized consulting. Clients highlight their account managers’ expertise and the value of ongoing assistance in optimizing their direct sales.
Many reviewers mention that Roiback’s support has been instrumental in their success, providing tailored advice and technical help. Without current data on Angelfish support, Roiback clearly leads here. Edge: Roiback.
Roiback integrates with 27 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder and niche providers such as RoomRaccoon. Its native integrations streamline operations across booking, PMS, and marketing platforms, enhancing the guest experience.
Angelfish, with only 3 verified partners, has limited integration options, mainly focusing on its internal analytics environment. For a hotel seeking seamless, broad-reaching integrations, Roiback’s ecosystem is the better choice. Edge: Roiback.
Roiback’s recent reviews are abundant, with a 4.49/5 ease of use rating and a 4.72/5 customer support score. Hoteliers across segments like city center, resort, and branded hotels rate it highly, emphasizing its reliability and feature set.
Angelfish has no recent reviews, and its overall ratings remain at zero, indicating no current user feedback or trust signals. Given the volume and recency of reviews, Roiback is clearly the hotter-rated product. Edge: Roiback.
Angelfish does not publicly disclose its pricing, suggesting it might be customized or limited to specific clients. Roiback’s base price starts at $500 per month, with no mention of implementation fees or freemium options, indicating a transparent subscription model.
For hotels on a budget, the lack of clear pricing for Angelfish makes comparison difficult. Roiback’s straightforward pricing allows you to evaluate investment against expected returns clearly. Edge: Roiback.
Roiback and Angelfish serve very different purposes within the hotel tech landscape. Angelfish is a niche analytics tool that helps improve website performance, while Roiback is a full-featured booking engine designed to boost direct sales. If your focus is on increasing revenue through online bookings, Roiback’s recent reviews, higher ratings, and extensive feature set make it the clear choice.
Hotels that want a proven, easy-to-use booking platform with strong support should opt for Roiback, especially if they operate in regions where its features and integrations are advantageous. Conversely, Angelfish may suit a highly technical team looking to leverage log analysis for website optimization but lacks the broader booking capabilities most hotels require.
Overall, Roiback’s higher review count, recent positive feedback, and comprehensive features make it the more reliable option for hotels seeking growth and operational efficiency today.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Angelfish Software 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Angelfish Software 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Roiback | Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Angelfish Software:否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Angelfish 的 HT Score 为 0,ROIBACK 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问