The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #31 21 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #49 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #30 18 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #39 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #49 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #37 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #32 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #14 39 条评价 |
Choosing between Ascon by Ascon and Redforts by Redforts hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, your operational complexity, and your budget. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they differ substantially in maturity, features, and user reception. Ascon, with no recent reviews or ratings, appears to be an untested or inactive option, whereas Redforts boasts a clear, recent track record with over 40 reviews and a 95% likelihood to recommend. Are you comfortable betting on an unverified platform, or do you prefer a solution with proven reviews and active support?
Redforts is the more reliable choice for your hotel. With 40 recent reviews, a 4.68/5 ease of use score, and a 4.53/5 customer support rating, it clearly outperforms Ascon, which has no reviews or ratings. If your goal is a product with established user satisfaction, Redforts stands out as the better option.
Both Ascon and Redforts are designed to tackle property management and streamline operations, but they diverge sharply in their market activity and maturity. Ascon’s absence of recent reviews or verified ratings raises questions about its current viability or support presence, while Redforts actively maintains a robust user base with over 40 reviews in the last six months, indicating ongoing development and support. The lack of visible integrations, features, and recent feedback for Ascon further weakens its position as a contender. Are you willing to rely on an unverified system, or do you want a proven, supported platform with recent user input?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one system that covers reservations, channel management, and revenue management effectively, Redforts is the clear choice. Its suite of 46 features, including native email marketing, guest CRM, online check-in, and real-time reporting, cater to hotels looking for comprehensive management tools. Conversely, Ascon offers no visible features or integrations, making it suitable only if you’re exploring options with minimal current support or feature sets—an unlikely scenario if your goal is operational efficiency or growth.
Redforts excels in ease of use, scoring 4.68/5 based on recent reviews, with many users describing it as intuitive, simple to learn, and efficient. The platform’s modern interface and responsive customer support further enhance adoption, especially for teams that need quick onboarding. Ascon, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no data on usability, but the absence of feedback suggests it may lack the intuitive design and active support that makes Redforts stand out. Edge: Redforts.
Redforts presents a rich feature set with 46 functionalities, including revenue management, online payment, guest messaging, and integration with channel managers like Mr Winston and WuBook. In contrast, Ascon offers no documented features, integrations, or modules, limiting its appeal to basic or outdated management needs. For hotels aiming for automation, customer engagement, and revenue optimization, Redforts’ comprehensive toolset provides a decisive edge. End: Edge: Redforts.
Redforts’ support scores 4.53/5, with many reviews citing their friendly, responsive, and effective customer service as a key benefit. Users mention quick response times and ongoing improvements, which foster trust and satisfaction. Ascon, with no recent reviews or active presence, provides no information on support quality, leaving uncertainty around its ability to assist or troubleshoot. Given the data, Redforts’ support is clearly more reliable. End: Edge: Redforts.
Redforts supports 2 verified integrations, namely with Mr Winston and WuBook, while Ascon reports no verified integrations or partner connections. These integrations simplify operations by connecting your PMS with channel managers or booking engines, critical for multichannel distribution. Without active integrations, Ascon’s utility diminishes significantly in a modern hospitality environment. End: Edge: Redforts.
Redforts has accumulated 40 recent reviews, with a 95% likelihood to recommend, and a 4.68/5 ease of use score, reflecting strong user satisfaction across hotel segments like B&Bs, hostels, boutique hotels, and city center hotels. Ascon’s lack of reviews or ratings makes it impossible to gauge user satisfaction, but the absence suggests limited adoption or activity. For hotel managers seeking proven satisfaction, Redforts is the obvious choice. End: Edge: Redforts.
Redforts charges a straightforward $500 monthly fee, with no free tier or trial available, positioning it as a cost-effective solution considering its feature set. Ascon's pricing details are not available, and given its lack of recent reviews or public information, it’s likely either inactive or not competitively priced. For budget-conscious hotels seeking transparency, Redforts offers a clear, predictable cost structure.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Redforts is a proven, feature-rich property management system with active user reviews and high satisfaction scores. It excels in ease of use, customer support, integrations, and overall market presence, making it suitable for most mid-sized and larger properties seeking comprehensive management tools.
Ascon, on the other hand, has no recent reviews, documented features, or active support information. Its lack of recent activity and user feedback suggests it’s not a viable option for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency or growth. Unless you’re experimenting or operating a very small, simple property, Redforts should be your choice.
In conclusion, if you need a reliable, well-supported PMS with recent reviews and a proven track record, Redforts is the clear winner. Its extensive feature set, active support, and high user satisfaction make it the safer investment for your hotel’s operations. Conversely, Ascon’s limited and outdated profile makes it unsuitable for most modern hospitality management needs.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户都喜欢 Redforts 的直观设计,它简化了培训并减少了人为错误。这简化了日常操作,让员工可以腾出时间处理其他任务。
该系统擅长管理预订、防止超额预订以及与多个平台集成。预订引擎和渠道管理的定制也是一大优势。
细心、响应迅速的客户服务经常受到称赞。用户提到个性化沟通和快速解决问题,为整体体验带来积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Redforts 可与预订引擎、渠道管理器和其他平台高效集成,提供无缝管理体验。此功能简化了不同系统和平台之间的协调。
虽然其功能受到称赞,但一些评论提到,界面似乎已经过时,可以通过现代化来增强视觉吸引力和效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Ascon 和 Redforts 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Ascon 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Redforts 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Redforts 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Ascon:否。Redforts:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Ascon 的 HT Score 为 0,Redforts 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问