The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,Ascon 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Ascon |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing between Ascon by Ascon and Mews PMS by Mews comes down to understanding what your hotel needs most. Both products aim to streamline operations, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market presence. Ascon’s lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest it’s not actively used or supported, whereas Mews boasts a thriving user base, recent feedback, and extensive integrations. Are you prepared to rely on a platform with proven user satisfaction?
Mews’s robust community and high review volume demonstrate its relevance and reliability for modern hoteliers. Ascon’s absence of reviews and zero score make it an unlikely contender for a decision today—unless you’re exploring unknown options.
Both products solve core property management issues—streamlining reservations, guest management, and operational workflows. However, Mews’s comprehensive feature set includes over 59 unique tools, from revenue management to automated housekeeping, while Ascon offers no listed features. Mews’s recent reviews and high ratings reflect ongoing development and user satisfaction, unlike Ascon, which has no recent reviews or ratings and appears inactive. Which platform will better support your hotel’s growth?
Ascon’s limited visibility and zero reviews make it hard to assess its reliability or support quality, whereas Mews’s active ecosystem and extensive reviews provide confidence. Are you comfortable choosing a system with no proven track record or recent user feedback?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS with proven market presence, go with Mews. Its 758 reviews in the last six months, a 4.62/5 rating, and a 93% likelihood to recommend demonstrate widespread satisfaction across various hotel segments, especially boutique and city hotels.
If your hotel requires a basic, perhaps niche solution with no recent updates or active community, Ascon might be an option—though its lack of reviews and ratings suggest otherwise. For most hotels, Mews’s proven track record and comprehensive ecosystem make it the clear choice.
Mews’s user rating for ease of use sits at an impressive 4.7/5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, real-time updates, and straightforward onboarding. Customers highlight how quickly staff can adopt Mews, reducing training time and operational friction.
Ascon provides no current ratings or reviews, making it impossible to gauge usability or onboarding success. Given Mews’s high score and active feedback, it’s the safer bet for a hotel seeking a user-friendly platform.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, online check-in, guest CRM, integrated CRS, mobile apps, and extensive automation tools. Its integrated marketplace with over 1,000 third-party apps offers unparalleled flexibility.
Ascon shows no listed features or integrations, leaving its capabilities unknown. The clear advantage goes to Mews, which provides a full suite of tools that support modern hotel operations and guest experience enhancements.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores are solid at 4.27/5, with recent reviews indicating prompt, helpful assistance and ongoing platform improvements. Customers mention that support is responsive, with a focus on quick issue resolution.
Ascon has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess support quality or responsiveness. Given Mews’s active support community and recent positive feedback, it’s the safer choice for reliable assistance.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue tools, and POS systems. Its open API and extensive marketplace enable seamless connectivity with industry-standard solutions.
Ascon has zero verified integrations, greatly limiting its utility in a multi-platform environment. For hotels seeking flexibility and a broad tech ecosystem, Mews’s integrations are unmatched.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews and high NPS score (9.12/10) reflect strong hotelier satisfaction across various property types, especially boutique hotels and independent properties. Its 4.62/5 rating and 93% recommendation rate underscore consistent positive experiences.
Ascon has no recent reviews, ratings, or hoteliers’ feedback available. Without current data, confidence in Ascon’s performance remains speculative.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing begins at $900/month, with no free tier or trial, and includes a comprehensive suite of features. Ascon provides no pricing information, making it impossible to evaluate its value or compare costs.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and extensive features, it offers a clear value proposition. With no data on Ascon’s costs, Mews’s offering appears more accessible and predictable.
Not ideal if your hotel values extensive automation, integrations, or proven support, as Ascon’s capabilities are unverified and no recent user feedback exists.
Not ideal if your property is very small, budget-focused, or in regions where Mews’s support isn’t yet established—though recent reviews suggest broad applicability.
Mews stands out as the leading option, with a proven track record, active community, and extensive feature set tailored for modern hospitality. Ascon’s lack of recent data and reviews make it a risky choice, especially when reliable support and proven functionality matter.
Choose Mews if your hotel values a scalable, flexible system backed by recent customer feedback, strong integrations, and ongoing innovation. Opt for Ascon only if you’re exploring very basic management tools without the need for support or proven market performance.
If your hotel needs a reliable, full-featured PMS that can grow with you, Mews is the clear winner. For minimal or experimental needs, Ascon offers no current evidence to justify a decision.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Ascon 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Ascon 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 335 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Ascon:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Ascon 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问