The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 81 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 在 ROI and onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Native Email Marketing.
Clock 表现出色 在 ease of use and accessibility 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Feedback Management and Payment Requests.
基于 HTR 上 81 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 2 | 79 |
在分析了 81 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 ,而 Clock 用户则强调 ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, 客户服务与支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务与支持
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
移动和用户界面
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #33 2 条评价 | #21 19 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #28 0 条评价 | #14 28 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #17 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #19 0 条评价 | #5 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #42 0 条评价 | #18 30 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #40 0 条评价 | #18 14 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 1 条评价 | #15 15 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 0 条评价 | #16 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #19 2 条评价 | #17 11 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #9 38 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #22 0 条评价 | #12 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #18 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and operational needs. Both ASI PMS and Clock HMS aim to streamline daily operations, but they differ significantly in scope, user reviews, and feature depth. While ASI offers a more traditional, all-in-one package with comprehensive modules, Clock emphasizes ease of use and broad integrations. Which tool best aligns with your hotel’s priorities?
ASI PMS is designed to serve multi-property portfolios and larger hotels needing extensive customization and automation. It consolidates reservation management, rate control, and reporting into one platform, making it ideal for hotels with complex operations. Conversely, Clock HMS appeals to a wide range of hotel types, especially boutique and independent hotels, thanks to its straightforward interface and robust integrations. Do you need a scalable, feature-rich system or a simple, reliable platform?
If your hotel requires a highly customizable, multi-module system capable of managing large portfolios across multiple regions, ASI PMS is the better fit. It offers advanced revenue management, guest CRM, and website development tools—features only in ASI. On the other hand, if your hotel values quick setup, ease of use, and seamless integrations with OTAs and POS systems, Clock HMS is the preferred choice. For hotels prioritizing operational simplicity and strong connectivity, Clock’s broad partner network and intuitive interface make it the right pick.
ASI PMS boasts a perfect 5/5 ease of use rating based on limited reviews, with users describing it as “very user friendly” and “making daily front desk operations smooth and fast.” However, some mention the need for more training videos and role-based access refinement. Clock HMS also scores highly at 4.73/5, with users highlighting its straightforward navigation and quick onboarding. It is especially appreciated for its simplicity and ease of understanding, making staff adoption easier.
Edge: ASI PMS.
While both are user-friendly, ASI’s slightly higher ease of use rating and positive review comments tip the scale toward it for hotels with complex workflows requiring minimal training.
ASI PMS offers 47 unique features, including automated night audit, website development, guest communication via SMS, native email marketing, and revenue management modules—capabilities that Clock HMS does not provide. Conversely, Clock surpasses with 10 unique features, such as POS integration, guest feedback management, online checkout, guest app, and GDPR compliance. While both systems share 39 features, ASI’s specialized modules cater more to larger, multi-faceted hotel operations.
Edge: ASI PMS.
If advanced revenue management, detailed reporting, and guest CRM are priorities, ASI’s extensive feature set gives it the edge.
Both products enjoy high support ratings, with ASI receiving a 5/5 and Clock a 4.78/5. Reviewers praise ASI support as “responsive, professional, and always ready to help,” while Clock’s support is described as “excellent and quick.” Some users note that Clock’s team listens and continuously improves based on customer feedback, which enhances overall satisfaction.
Edge: ASI PMS.
Given the slightly higher support rating and consistent positive feedback, ASI’s support is marginally more dependable for critical operational help.
Clock boasts 111 verified partners, substantially more than ASI’s 19. Shared integrations include major players like SiteMinder, Cendyn, and TrustYou. ASI’s integrations are more focused, with key partners like OTAs, payment gateways, and accounting tools, but fewer in number. If extensive third-party connectivity is your priority, Clock’s broader partner network is advantageous.
Edge: Clock HMS.
Its wide array of integrations and open API offer greater flexibility for hotels seeking to connect multiple systems.
Clock HMS enjoys a high 4.88/5 rating across 63 reviews, with many praising its ease of use, reliability, and support. In contrast, ASI PMS’s reviews are limited—only two reviews, both highly positive—making it difficult to assess broader sentiment. Recent reviews for Clock reinforce its strong reputation among boutique and small hotels.
Edge: Clock HMS.
With more recent reviews and a higher overall rating, Clock’s user satisfaction appears more robust.
ASI PMS’s base price is $300, with no trial or hidden fees, making it a cost-effective choice for hotels seeking value. Clock’s base price is $600, also without trial or additional charges, reflecting its broader feature set and integrations. Both follow a straightforward pricing model, but Clock’s higher cost might reflect its extensive capabilities.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ASI PMS is a robust, feature-rich platform suited for larger properties, multi-property portfolios, or hotels with complex operational needs. Its comprehensive modules and scalability make it ideal for properties demanding detailed analytics, revenue management, and automation.
Clock HMS excels in simplicity, fast deployment, and broad integrations, making it perfect for boutique, independent, or smaller hotels that prioritize ease of use and connectivity without sacrificing functionality. Its high user satisfaction, recent reviews, and extensive partner network make it a compelling choice for dynamic, customer-focused properties.
When to choose ASI PMS:
When to choose Clock HMS:
Based on the volume and recency of reviews, Clock HMS holds a clear advantage, demonstrating high satisfaction among a broad user base. Its high ratings, ease of use, and extensive integrations make it the top choice for most boutique and independent hotels.
However, if your property operates on a larger scale or requires advanced revenue management and multi-property controls, ASI PMS’s detailed modules and customization options may better serve your needs. Its limited but positive reviews suggest a dependable system for more complex scenarios.
Ultimately, for most hotels considering current user feedback, Clock HMS offers a more proven and widely appreciated solution. For larger or more specialized operations, ASI PMS remains a strong contender—though its review count and recent feedback are limited.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASI PMS - All-in-one Hotel Management Software 和 Clock HMS 共享 39 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款请求 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 销售点 | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 6 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导... Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持,以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评,但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导和复杂功能支持。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分... 尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求,但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成,以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分用户认为现有报告功能不足,且难以从中获取全面的洞察。
用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态... 用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置,以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意,但部分用户指出,他们希望修改报告和界面设置,以便更好地支持动态运营和营销策略。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASI PMS - All-in-one Hotel Management Software 和 Clock HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI PMS - All-in-one Hotel Management Software 提供 19 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Clock HMS 提供 111 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASI PMS - All-in-one Hotel Management Software 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI PMS - All-in-one Hotel Management Software:否。Clock HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 0,Clock 的为 79。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问