项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 296 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Room substitutions and Flexible dates.
Exely 表现出色 在 支持响应速度和账户指导 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Automated reporting and Referral Reporting.
基于 HTR 上 296 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 起价 $200/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 22 | 274 |
在分析了 296 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 ,而 Exely 用户则强调 支持响应速度和账户指导, 速度、稳定性与日常运营的便捷性, 预订引擎的易用性与客人转化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持响应速度和账户指导
▾
|
|
|
+
速度、稳定性与日常运营的便捷性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎的易用性与客人转化
▾
|
|
|
+
直接预订与收入增长
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告与分析深度
▾
|
|
|
−
设计、品牌和定制限制
▾
|
|
|
−
集成与PMS连接
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #38 2 条评价 | #15 34 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #37 3 条评价 | #11 64 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #23 1 条评价 | #8 6 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #45 1 条评价 | #15 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #46 1 条评价 | #15 28 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #39 2 条评价 | #16 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #36 1 条评价 | #16 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 4 条评价 | #24 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #25 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #26 1 条评价 | #4 79 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #2 17 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is vital for your hotel's success, especially when it comes to increasing direct bookings and streamlining operations. Both ASI WebRes by Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) and Exely Booking Engine aim to boost your online reservation capabilities, but they differ significantly in features, reviews, and market presence. Your decision should hinge on your property's specific needs, budget, and growth plans.
While both platforms target independent hotels and chains, ASI’s extensive integration network and long-standing industry experience make it a robust option, especially for multi-property management. Exely, with its newer market presence and focus on marketing tools, offers a compelling experience for hotels prioritizing guest conversion and digital marketing. Do you want a proven, comprehensive system or a more marketing-driven solution?
Both ASI WebRes and Exely Booking Engine provide online reservation tools designed to increase direct bookings and improve guest experience. However, ASI’s platform benefits from a 20-review count with recent activity and a 4.95/5 ease of use score, indicating a high level of user satisfaction for daily operations.
In contrast, Exely has a significantly larger review base with 144 recent reviews and a score of 4.91/5 for ease of use, suggesting broader adoption and continuous improvements. Given the volume and recency of reviews, Exely’s platform currently offers more reliable insights into user satisfaction and ongoing support.
Are you looking for a platform with a proven track record and extensive integrations, or one with a rapidly growing user base and marketing features?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, user-friendly booking engine that emphasizes guest conversion and marketing, Exely is your best choice. Its extensive marketing tools, fast channel synchronization, and detailed reviews from diverse property types make it ideal for independent hotels and boutique chains aiming to boost direct reservations.
If your hotel requires a comprehensive property management system with integrated reservations, channel management, and operational modules, ASI’s platform is more suited. Its deep feature set, including real-time inventory management, multi-property oversight, and broad integrations, appeals to larger or multi-property portfolios seeking operational efficiency.
Fundamentally, choose Exely if your priority is marketing and direct booking growth; select ASI if you need an all-in-one property management solution with robust reservation capabilities.
Both platforms score very highly for ease of use, with ASI at 4.95/5 and Exely at 4.91/5. ASI’s reviews praise its straightforward workflows, intuitive dashboard, and quick onboarding, with users highlighting the system’s user-friendly design for daily operations.
Exely’s interface is similarly praised for simplicity, with users appreciating its dashboard for managing rates, availability, and reservations efficiently. However, some reviews suggest Exely could improve backend navigation and report customization, though these are minor concerns.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI’s platform features 27 unique modules, including pooled inventory, social media integration, gift vouchers, wedding and corporate booking modules, and ADA compliance—many designed for multi-property operations. Exely offers 9 exclusive features like booking abandonment recapture, GDPR compliance, automated reporting, and multiple payment options, enhancing its marketing and conversion tools.
Both systems share 20 core features, but ASI’s broader feature set is tailored towards operational complexity and multi-property management. Exely’s strengths lie in customer engagement and automation, but it lacks some operational modules found in ASI.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
Review scores show ASI’s support at 4.85/5, with users mentioning prompt technical assistance and smooth onboarding. One review states, “Technical issues are resolved immediately, and support staff are courteous and knowledgeable,” underscoring its reliability.
Exely edges slightly ahead with a 4.96/5 support rating, with users praising its quick responses and friendly communication. A user notes, “The seller answers all questions promptly and clearly,” reflecting strong customer service.
Edge: Exely Booking Engine.
ASI offers 19 verified partner integrations, including SiteMinder, Cendyn, and Duetto—covering channel management, revenue management, and distribution. Exely, with 8 verified partners, includes Hotellab, Oracle Hospitality, IDeaS, and Mews, but fewer overall options.
Both platforms integrate with key industry systems, but ASI’s broader network of partners provides greater flexibility for larger, multi-system operations.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
With 20 recent reviews, ASI has a perfect 5-star rating, with users praising its usability and operational support. One reviewer states, “The system is very user-friendly, making daily tasks seamless,” especially in multi-property contexts.
Exely’s 144 reviews yield a slightly lower rating of ~4.92/5 but reflect broad adoption across hotel types, notably boutique and city-center hotels. Users commend its marketing features and channel management, though some mention room for customization improvements.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI does not publicly list pricing, suggesting a tailored quote based on property size and needs. Conversely, Exely charges a straightforward $200/month fee, with no additional implementation or setup costs.
If budget transparency is crucial, Exely offers a clear, predictable pricing model. For larger properties or multi-property portfolios, ASI’s custom pricing may provide better value, but confirmation requires direct contact.
Not ideal if you’re a small hotel or boutique property only needing a booking engine. Limited budgets or minimal operational complexity might make simpler solutions more attractive.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a full property management system or advanced operational features. Larger chains seeking integrated solutions might find Exely’s offering too limited.
The core difference lies in scope: ASI offers a comprehensive property management and reservation system with extensive integrations, suited for larger or multi-property hotels. Exely is a marketing-focused booking engine that excels at driving direct bookings and simplifying online reservation workflows.
If your hotel needs a broad operational platform with robust reporting and multi-property oversight, ASI is the better choice. Its vast feature set and proven industry presence make it a reliable solution for complex operations.
For properties prioritizing guest conversion, marketing automation, and straightforward booking management, Exely provides a quick, user-friendly interface backed by excellent support. Its competitive pricing and focus on direct bookings make it ideal for independent hotels and boutique brands aiming to grow their online presence.
Ultimately, your decision should be based on whether operational depth or marketing focus aligns more with your strategic goals. For most hoteliers seeking recent reviews, support, and integrations, Exely Booking Engine’s larger, more recent review footprint makes it the stronger candidate today.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | — | 起价 $200/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评价赞扬Exely的支持团队、客户成功团队和账户经理,因其快速回复、清晰指导以及在设置和日常运营中的主动帮助。多家酒店表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间... 许多评价赞扬Exely的支持团队、客户成功团队和账户经理,因其快速回复、清晰指导以及在设置和日常运营中的主动帮助。多家酒店表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,加快了部署速度,并使平台更易于采用和操作。
用户经常提到,Exely通过集中管理预订、价格、房态和客人信息,简化了日常酒店工作。他们也很看重平台的速度和稳定性,尽管少数评论提到在高峰期加载缓慢或偶尔... 用户经常提到,Exely通过集中管理预订、价格、房态和客人信息,简化了日常酒店工作。他们也很看重平台的速度和稳定性,尽管少数评论提到在高峰期加载缓慢或偶尔出现预订流程问题。
预订引擎一直被描述为易于客人使用、响应迅速、移动端友好,并且能有效将网站访客转化为预订。评测者将其简洁的流程、部件和灵活的预订选项与更高的转化率和更好... 预订引擎一直被描述为易于客人使用、响应迅速、移动端友好,并且能有效将网站访客转化为预订。评测者将其简洁的流程、部件和灵活的预订选项与更高的转化率和更好的客人预订体验联系在一起。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户反复提出的主要需求之一是更详细、可定制的报告和分析。用户希望深入了解预订趋势、转化率、收入来源、渠道表现、预订动态、入住率变化以及仪表盘的灵活性,... 用户反复提出的主要需求之一是更详细、可定制的报告和分析。用户希望深入了解预订趋势、转化率、收入来源、渠道表现、预订动态、入住率变化以及仪表盘的灵活性,以便做出更好的商务和定价决策。
许多评论者希望对预订引擎和网站的外观与体验拥有更多控制权,包括颜色、模板、部件、确认邮件、发票和报表布局。Exely 以简洁的设计受到好评,但买家应注意到对... 许多评论者希望对预订引擎和网站的外观与体验拥有更多控制权,包括颜色、模板、部件、确认邮件、发票和报表布局。Exely 以简洁的设计受到好评,但买家应注意到对更深层次品牌定制和更现代、独特网站风格的反复需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。ASI WebRes 和 Exely Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI WebRes 提供 21 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Booking Engine 提供 9 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。ASI WebRes 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI WebRes:否。Exely Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 0,Exely 的为 97。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐