The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店无钥匙门禁系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Miwa
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 5 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 56 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 56 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #1 19 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Miwa
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 38 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #1 69 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #1 98 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 17 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Miwa
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 23 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 23 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #1 39 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #1 29 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Vingcard’s Mobile Access and Miwa’s lock systems hinges on your hotel’s priorities. Vingcard offers a comprehensive, well-rated mobile access solution with extensive features and a strong global presence, while Miwa focuses on high-quality hardware and lock technology, but lacks recent reviews or extensive user feedback. Both address hotel security and guest convenience, but their approaches diverge significantly.
Vingcard’s mobile access platform emphasizes guest experience, integration, and software functionalities, whereas Miwa’s strength lies in hardware reliability and proprietary lock technology. Which aligns better with your property’s needs?
Vingcard’s Mobile Access by ASSA ABLOY provides an integrated, app-based keyless entry system engineered for hotels seeking to modernize guest check-in and enhance security. It operates with secure Seos® technology, allowing encrypted digital keys delivered via smartphones and smartwatches, and supports delivery through mobile wallets like Apple Wallet and Google Wallet.
In contrast, Miwa specializes in lock hardware, manufacturing and controlling every aspect of their locks from design to production. Their focus is on delivering durable, high-performance physical locks built from premium materials, with a legacy dating back to 1945. While Miwa’s locks are trusted globally, they lack the integrated software or mobile app components that Vingcard offers.
Both products aim to improve hotel security, but Vingcard’s digital approach emphasizes guest convenience and operational efficiency, whereas Miwa’s hardware solution prioritizes reliability and physical security. Are your hotel guests more inclined toward digital access or traditional lock security?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich mobile access system with wide integrations and a strong user base, go with Vingcard. It’s ideal for properties looking to offer contactless check-in, remote management, and digital keys, especially if operating in regions where Vingcard’s global presence and extensive partner network are advantages.
If your hotel requires high-quality, durable locks with minimal reliance on digital infrastructure—particularly if you prioritize hardware longevity and control—Miwa is the better fit. Its programmable locks are suited for properties that value physical security, such as legacy hotels, boutique inns, or those with existing technology infrastructure.
For properties aiming to modernize and enhance guest experience with digital keys, Vingcard has the upper hand. For those focused on lock durability and control over hardware, Miwa’s locks are your choice.
Vingcard’s Mobile Access has an impressive ease-of-use rating of 4.72/5, with reviews praising its simple mobile app, quick onboarding, and reliable functionality. Users highlight how straightforward it is to deliver digital keys and manage access remotely, with many noting that staff adoption is smooth once initial training is completed.
Conversely, Miwa’s hardware-centric approach doesn’t involve user-facing software, so ease of use mainly depends on lock installation and maintenance. Since there are no recent reviews or ratings, we cannot assess how hotel staff or guests find the system operationally.
Edge: Vingcard.
Vingcard offers 12 features exclusive to its platform, including mobile app access, guest management dashboard, cloud-based access management, remote check-in, door hardware upgrades, notifications, Apple Watch app, and SDK for developers. These features facilitate a seamless, digital guest experience and operational control.
Miwa’s system focuses solely on lock hardware, with no software features or digital management tools. Its strength is in the hardware’s durability, security, and dual-card technology, but it lacks the ecosystem of features that Vingcard provides.
Edge: Vingcard.
Vingcard’s support scores 4.57/5, with recent reviews emphasizing quick response times, professional assistance, and effective onboarding. Guests and hotel staff appreciate their proactive communication and dedicated support teams, making troubleshooting smoother.
There are no recent reviews for Miwa, making it impossible to accurately compare support quality. The absence of user feedback suggests Vingcard’s support network is more established and reliable for your needs.
Edge: Vingcard.
Vingcard’s system integrates with 72 verified partners, including major PMS and property management solutions like Opera, Yanolja Cloud, and OpenKey. This extensive network allows hotels to connect their access system seamlessly with existing infrastructure.
Miwa’s integration footprint is limited to just two verified partners, including OpenKey and Yanolja Cloud Solution. The smaller ecosystem restricts integration options and may complicate broader hotel system connectivity.
Edge: Vingcard.
Vingcard’s hotel reviews are recent, with a high overall rating of 4.73/5 based on 140 reviews, including a 95% likelihood to recommend. Independent hotels rate it 4.75/5, and branded hotels 4.65/5, reflecting strong satisfaction across segments.
Since Miwa has no review data or recent feedback, we cannot assess hotel ratings. Given the volume and recency of Vingcard’s reviews, it clearly has a stronger reputation among hoteliers.
Edge: Vingcard.
Vingcard’s pricing starts at a base of $400, with no mention of monthly fees or implementation costs. It appears to be a straightforward purchase, but additional hardware or software upgrades may incur extra charges.
Miwa’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting the product may be sold on a quote basis or bundled within larger security packages. Its hardware-only approach typically involves costs for locks and installation, but specific prices are not provided.
Not ideal if your hotel is small or prefers traditional lock-and-key security.
Not ideal if you want digital management, mobile keys, or extensive integration capabilities.
Vingcard’s Mobile Access offers a comprehensive, software-driven keyless entry platform with high user ratings, extensive features, and broad integrations. Its focus on digital convenience makes it ideal for hotels looking to modernize and elevate guest experiences.
Miwa provides robust, high-quality locks that excel in physical security but lack recent user feedback or software features. Its hardware focus suits properties valuing durability and control over access points without digital management.
Choose Vingcard if your hotel aims for a modern, guest-centric approach with software integrations. Opt for Miwa if your priority is durable hardware and traditional security, especially for legacy properties or regions with limited digital infrastructure.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"When we launched the Quest mobile app in 2019, our aim was to make booking easy but thanks to the combined technologies of ASSA ABLOY Global Solutions and Liverton, we now have the..."
Miwa
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
移动钥匙功能广受好评,因为它提供了无缝的入住和出入体验,提高了客人满意度和运营效率。它使客人无需排队等候前台服务,从而提高了他们的便利性。
虽然支持团队普遍受到称赞,但一些用户表示需要更多的本地支持资源,以确保更快的响应时间和轻松获得技术援助。
用户欣赏该产品根据特定需求进行定制的能力,例如集成专有的移动钥匙解决方案或适应各种装饰风格。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
安装过程和项目管理因其高效和专业性而受到称赞,尽管一些评论提到了安装过程中的协调问题。
用户强调了 Visionline 软件的报告和用户访问管理功能的一些问题,建议改进这些方面以增强整体可用性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mobile Access by Vingcard 和 Miwa 共享许多核心 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mobile Access by Vingcard 提供 72 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Miwa 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mobile Access by Vingcard 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mobile Access by Vingcard:否。Miwa:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Vingcard 的 HT Score 为 54,Miwa 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问