The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 97 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Aven Hospitality 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Gift Vouchers & Prepaid Experiences and Automated Fulfillment Task Routing.
Oracle Hospitality 表现出色 在 综合费率管理工具 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Check-in upselling and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).
基于 HTR 上 97 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 2 | 95 |
在分析了 97 条经验证的评价后,Aven Hospitality 用户最看重其 ,而 Oracle Hospitality 用户则强调 综合费率管理工具, 基于云的功能, 与第三方系统集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
综合费率管理工具
▾
|
|
|
+
基于云的功能
▾
|
|
|
+
与第三方系统集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
复杂性和学习曲线
▾
|
|
|
−
成本问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 追加销售软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #13 3 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 2 条评价 | #6 35 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #22 0 条评价 | #4 39 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 11 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #24 1 条评价 | #6 41 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #22 2 条评价 | #5 56 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #24 1 条评价 | #4 53 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #8 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #15 2 条评价 | #5 29 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #12 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #3 36 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #6 6 条评价 |
Choosing the right upselling software for your hotel hinges on your specific operational needs, budget, and guest engagement goals. Aven Hospitality Retailing offers a straightforward, highly-rated solution with a focus on broad revenue opportunities, while Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising provides a more extensive, AI-driven platform with a complex feature set. Both aim to increase your ancillary revenue but diverge significantly in ease of use, integration, and target hotel segments.
For hoteliers seeking simplicity and proven support, Aven Hospitality's retailing tool stands out. Conversely, if your hotel benefits from advanced automation, extensive integrations, and multi-channel communication, Oracle's platform offers a more comprehensive approach. Are you ready to prioritize ease or depth in your upselling strategy?
Both products are designed to boost non-room revenue, but their core strengths differ. Aven Hospitality Retailing specializes in selling a wide array of goods, services, and policies beyond rooms, emphasizing ease of use and rapid onboarding. Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement focuses on real-time, AI-driven upselling throughout the guest journey, integrating with existing systems to maximize revenue potential.
Aven Hospitality boasts a perfect 5/5 rating for ease of use, supported by just one review, highlighting its intuitive reservation and retail management features. Oracle, with a 4.64/5 rating and 78 reviews, offers more advanced capabilities, yet some users find it complex and costly for smaller hotels. Do you prefer a simple, reliable solution or a feature-rich, automated platform?
If your hotel prioritizes straightforward retailing with minimal setup, go with Aven Hospitality Retailing. Its reviews praise its intuitive interface, excellent support, and broad retail functionality, especially suited for luxury hotels that want quick results without extensive training. For properties that aim to automate personalized upsell offers across multiple channels and integrate with various systems, Oracle OPERA's AI-driven platform is the better fit.
Large, tech-savvy hotels with existing OPERA PMS systems and a desire for automation will find Oracle's extensive features and integrations worth the investment. Smaller or less technologically advanced hotels may find Oracle's complexity and higher costs a barrier, making Aven Hospitality a more practical choice.
Aven Hospitality Retailing scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and seamless onboarding process. Users report that their teams adopted the platform quickly, thanks to clear workflows and straightforward retail management.
Oracle OPERA, rated 4.64/5, is praised for its user-friendliness but acknowledged to have a steeper learning curve due to its extensive capabilities and integrations. Its complexity can require more staff training and longer onboarding periods, especially for hotels with limited technical resources.
Edge: Aven Hospitality.
Aven Hospitality offers 8 shared features with Oracle and 2 exclusive features—Gift Vouchers & Prepaid Experiences and Automated Fulfillment Task Routing. Oracle, meanwhile, provides 5 unique features, including Check-in upselling, Multi-Channel Delivery, and Offer Orchestration, along with 8 shared features.
Oracle's advanced features support multi-channel communication, A/B testing, and offer experimentation, making it ideal for hotels seeking automation and detailed control. Aven Hospitality excels in retailing and fulfillment, making it more suitable for straightforward upsell and retail needs.
Edge: Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement.
Aven Hospitality's customer support scores a perfect 5/5, with reviews emphasizing its communicative, helpful team and excellent onboarding experience. Users are highly satisfied, describing the support as a key strength that makes implementation smooth.
Oracle's support is rated 4.18/5, with some reviews noting that while the platform is feature-rich, its complexity can pose onboarding challenges. Users appreciate the support but mention that training can be time-consuming and costly.
Edge: Aven Hospitality.
Oracle OPERA offers 391 verified integrations, compared to Aven Hospitality's 80, with 53 shared integrations. Oracle's extensive partner network includes popular systems like Criton, Curacity, and Innspire, providing broader options for connecting with your existing tech stack.
Aven Hospitality’s integrations include key PMS and booking systems, but its smaller partner network may limit options for some hotels. If extensive system integration is a priority, Oracle's platform provides a wider ecosystem.
Edge: Oracle OPERA.
Oracle OPERA's overall rating is 4.31/5 based on 78 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its automation features and wide integrations. Hotel segments such as luxury, branded, and independent properties rate it highly, appreciating its capacity for complex operations.
Aven Hospitality, with only one review, has an overall 0/5 rating. Its limited review base makes it difficult to assess broader hotel segment satisfaction, but the positive comments emphasize ease of onboarding and retail success.
Edge: Oracle OPERA.
Aven Hospitality retails at a flat rate of $600, with no mention of additional fees or a trial period. Oracle OPERA's base price is $100, but additional costs for implementation, customization, and licensing can significantly increase expenses.
Oracle's lower initial price is attractive, but the total cost of ownership may be higher considering setup and training, whereas Aven Hospitality offers a predictable, straightforward fee structure.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Aven Hospitality Retailing offers a straightforward, reliable retailing platform that suits luxury hotels and properties needing a simple upsell solution. Its ease of use, excellent support, and retail focus make it a smart choice for hotels prioritizing quick deployment and incremental revenue.
Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement provides a broad, AI-driven upselling suite with extensive integrations and automation. It’s ideal for large, tech-savvy hotels seeking to maximize revenue through complex, personalized guest offers and multi-channel communication.
If you value simplicity, support, and rapid results, go with Aven Hospitality. For hotels aiming for automation, detailed customization, and a wide feature set, Oracle OPERA is the better choice.
In conclusion, your decision should reflect your operational complexity, technological readiness, and revenue goals. If simplicity and speed matter most, Aven Hospitality delivers. If automation and extensive integrations are crucial, Oracle OPERA will serve you better.
追加销售软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Aven Hospitality Retailing 和 Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising 共享 8 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 优惠实验和 A/B 测试 | ||
| 办理登机手续追加销售 | ||
| 多渠道推送(电子邮件、短信、WhatsApp、聊天) | ||
| 多物业/连锁仪表盘 | ||
| 服务流程编排(预订 → 到店前 → 到店后 → 入住期间 → 退房后) | ||
| 礼品券和预付体验 | ||
| 自动化履行任务路由 |
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"With success hinging on so many unknown variables in an altered marketplace, Nor1 provides me with a sense of control. In the times that we’re in, that’s priceless."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户称赞OPERA的集成费率管理功能,它简化了日常运营,使员工能够专注于追加销售和交叉销售。尽管有些人觉得操作繁琐,但这款工具可以帮助员工通过清晰、精简的... 用户称赞OPERA的集成费率管理功能,它简化了日常运营,使员工能够专注于追加销售和交叉销售。尽管有些人觉得操作繁琐,但这款工具可以帮助员工通过清晰、精简的流程优化收入潜力。
OPERA 的云特性因其减少对本地服务器的依赖、改善远程访问以及确保无缝更新而备受赞誉。这些功能在统一运营和维持有效的追加销售策略方面具有显著优势。
OPERA 以其强大的集成能力而备受赞誉,其集成能力涵盖 POS 系统和分析系统等众多第三方系统。这种广泛的集成有助于统一酒店运营和数据,从而创造更有意义的追加... OPERA 以其强大的集成能力而备受赞誉,其集成能力涵盖 POS 系统和分析系统等众多第三方系统。这种广泛的集成有助于统一酒店运营和数据,从而创造更有意义的追加销售机会,并优化宾客体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户反映,OPERA 的众多功能导致学习难度加大,入职流程复杂。这对小型酒店的影响更大,因为它们的培训资源可能有限,从而引发成本和效率方面的担忧。
OPERA 的高昂成本(包括许可、实施和定制)给小型或单体酒店带来了障碍。虽然 OPERA 功能强大,但对于预算紧张的酒店来说,这些成本可能超过其带来的好处。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Aven Hospitality Retailing 和 Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising 共享许多核心 Upselling Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Aven Hospitality Retailing 提供 80 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising 提供 391 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Aven Hospitality Retailing 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Aven Hospitality Retailing:否。Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Upselling Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Aven Hospitality 的 HT Score 为 0,Oracle Hospitality 的为 78。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问