The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 76 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 369 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 39 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 16 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 232 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 320 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 166 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 32 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 440 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #15 11 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #16 3 条评价 | — |
When choosing a booking engine for your hotel, the core question is which platform aligns best with your operational needs and growth ambitions. SHR Group’s Booking Engine (BE) offers a comprehensive, feature-rich solution with strong industry backing, while GraceSoft’s platform emphasizes simplicity and straightforward management. Both aim to boost direct bookings, but their approaches and capabilities diverge significantly.
The critical factor is your hotel’s size, complexity, and the strategic role you want your booking engine to play. Do you prioritize advanced features and integrations, or do you prefer ease of use and streamlined workflows? Let’s explore how each product stacks up.
SHR Group’s Booking Engine stands out as a mature, feature-packed platform with a proven track record of integrating with numerous hotel systems and supporting complex operations across diverse segments. Its 339 reviews and high ratings in recent months emphasize its popularity among hoteliers seeking advanced capabilities. Conversely, GraceSoft’s platform has no recent reviews or available ratings, making it difficult to gauge its current performance or user satisfaction.
SHR Group’s platform excels in offering tools like A/B testing, urgency messaging, loyalty integrations, multi-lingual support, and extensive reporting — features that elevate operational efficiency and revenue management. GraceSoft’s platform, while simpler, aims for ease of use with intuitive interfaces, but lacks the depth of features and recent user feedback to confirm its effectiveness.
Do you need a robust system with extensive customization and integration options, or a straightforward tool that minimizes training and onboarding? Your hotel’s complexity and growth plans should guide your choice.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, highly customizable booking engine capable of supporting multiple segments, currencies, and complex rate strategies, SHR Group is the clear winner. Its 46 exclusive features, including multi-currency, loyalty integration, and advanced rate management, make it suitable for hotels aiming to maximize revenue through detailed control.
If simplicity, ease of onboarding, and minimal technical support are your priorities, GraceSoft’s platform might appeal — but the lack of recent reviews and detailed feature data makes it less reliable for scaling operations. For hotels seeking proven, recent positive feedback and extensive capabilities, SHR Group’s platform is the more dependable choice.
Your decision should hinge on whether you value depth and flexibility (SHR Group) or streamlined simplicity (GraceSoft). Given the data, SHR Group’s platform is better suited for hotels with growth ambitions and complex needs.
SHR Group’s ease of use is rated 4.67/5 across 339 reviews, with many users praising its intuitive interface and helpful onboarding process. Customers frequently mention that the platform’s design makes managing bookings, rate plans, and integrations straightforward, despite its advanced features.
GraceSoft’s platform lacks recent user ratings and detailed reviews, but its marketing emphasizes an intuitive interface aimed at simplifying guest reservations and management. However, without recent feedback or ratings, confirming its ease of use is difficult.
Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group offers 46 exclusive features, including mobile optimization, A/B testing, urgency messaging, special offers, pooled inventory, pre- and post-stay emails, multi-lingual support, loyalty program integration, and advanced reporting. These tools support sophisticated marketing, revenue management, and guest engagement strategies.
GraceSoft provides core booking and reservation management features but does not list additional capabilities or unique tools comparable to SHR’s extensive suite. Its platform appears more basic, lacking the advanced features critical for larger or more segmented hotels.
Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group’s support ratings are excellent, with a 4.86/5 score from 339 reviews, and recent feedback highlights their proactive, knowledgeable support teams. Hoteliers describe their onboarding, training, and ongoing support as responsive and effective, especially in complex integration scenarios.
GraceSoft offers no recent reviews or support ratings. Without current customer feedback, assessing their support quality isn’t possible, but the absence of recent verified reviews raises concerns about support reliability.
Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group’s platform integrates with 81 verified partners, including major PMS, channel managers, and third-party systems, enabling seamless connection with existing hotel infrastructure. This extensive integration ecosystem ensures your team can operate efficiently without disrupting current workflows.
GraceSoft’s platform, in contrast, has only one verified partner, limiting its connectivity options and flexibility. This narrow integration scope could challenge hotels that rely on multiple systems or plan to expand their tech stack.
Edge: SHR Group.
Based on recent reviews, SHR Group’s platform is highly rated, with an overall score of 4.86/5 and a 96% likelihood of recommendation, reflecting strong user satisfaction. Hoteliers across segments like boutique and luxury hotels praise its advanced features, reporting improved revenue and direct bookings.
GraceSoft offers no recent ratings or reviews, so its user satisfaction remains unverified. The lack of recent feedback makes SHR Group the more trusted choice for proven performance.
Edge: SHR Group.
Both platforms do not publicly disclose detailed pricing models. SHR Group’s pricing is typically customized based on hotel size and needs, with no mention of freemium or fixed monthly fees. GraceSoft also offers tailored quotes, but without concrete figures, cost comparison isn’t feasible.
Your hotel’s budget considerations should involve direct inquiries, but given SHR Group’s extensive features and support, it is likely a higher investment aligned with larger or more complex operations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
SHR Group’s Booking Engine offers a comprehensive, highly versatile platform with proven industry success, extensive integrations, and a broad feature set that supports complex hotel operations. Its recent reviews and high ratings confirm its standing as a preferred choice for hotels aiming for growth and revenue optimization.
GraceSoft’s platform emphasizes simplicity and ease of management, making it suitable for small or boutique hotels with basic needs. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited features suggest it may struggle to support larger, more complex operations effectively.
For hoteliers serious about scaling and maximizing revenue, SHR Group’s Booking Engine is the more reliable and comprehensive solution. If your focus is on ease, minimal setup, and basic reservation management, GraceSoft could be considered, but with caution due to the limited recent data.
In conclusion, if your hotel needs proven, feature-rich technology with ongoing support and extensive integrations, SHR Group’s Booking Engine is the clear choice.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软... 用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软件的使用非常有价值。30 篇评论涵盖了此主题。
经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,... 经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,一些用户希望改进与其他系统和平台的集成。此主题出现在 18 篇评论中。
用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的... 用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的导航有助于提高整体效率。此主题在 20 条评论中被提及。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户指出,虽然前端很人性化,但后端导航和过滤选项可以更加直观和人性化。这些方面的改进可以显著提高效率和用户满意度。此主题在 12 条评论中被提及。
一些用户建议可以改进预订引擎的视觉美感。增强用户界面的精致和现代设计可以进一步提升整体预订体验,并使其更具视觉吸引力。6 篇评论讨论了此主题。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 和 Gracesoft Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Gracesoft Booking Engine 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Booking Engine (BE):否。Gracesoft Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 43,GraceSoft 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案