The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,113 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
SHR Group 表现出色 在 主动客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 Boutique Hotels 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Special offers & discounts and Gift Vouchers & Prepaid Experiences.
Profitroom 表现出色 在 预订引擎和集成 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) .
基于 HTR 上 1,113 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 512 | 601 |
在分析了 1,113 条经验证的评价后,SHR Group 用户最看重其 主动客户支持, 集成功能, 直观的界面,而 Profitroom 用户则强调 预订引擎和集成, customer support and response time, 新手引导和易用性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
主动客户支持
▾
|
+
预订引擎和集成
▾
|
|
+
集成功能
▾
|
+
Customer Support and Response Time
▾
|
|
+
直观的界面
▾
|
+
新手引导和易用性
▾
|
|
+
费率和库存管理
▾
|
+
定制和品牌推广
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
后端导航改进
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
视觉与美学设计
▾
|
−
语言和货币支持
▾
|
|
−
支持文档和培训
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 76 条评价 | #3 176 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 369 条评价 | #3 323 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 39 条评价 | #2 54 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 16 条评价 | #4 21 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 232 条评价 | #2 227 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 320 条评价 | #3 217 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 166 条评价 | #3 137 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 32 条评价 | #2 81 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 39 条评价 | #9 26 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 440 条评价 | #1 491 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #15 11 条评价 | #13 13 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #16 3 条评价 | #10 5 条评价 |
Your hotel is evaluating two leading booking engines: SHR Booking Engine (BE) by SHR Group and Profitroom Booking Engine 360 by Profitroom. Both systems aim to boost direct bookings, improve revenue management, and enhance guest experiences, but they approach these goals differently. SHR BE is known for its extensive integrations and customizable features, while Profitroom emphasizes ease of use and engaging design. Which platform aligns better with your hotel's specific needs?
In the end, your choice hinges on your hotel’s size, segment, and growth ambitions. Do you want a more established, review-backed system with proven results, or a platform that offers superior user experience and recent innovation?
Both SHR BE and Profitroom 360 cater to hoteliers seeking to maximize direct bookings, but they diverge significantly in their approach and maturity. SHR BE, with a review count of 339 and recent reviews in the last six months, enjoys a more robust data set, indicating a proven track record and ongoing support. Its features focus on deep customization, detailed revenue management, and extensive integrations, especially suited for larger, segmented, or sophisticated hotel portfolios.
Profitroom, with 505 reviews and a higher recent review count, exhibits a higher overall rating (4.76 vs. SHR’s 4.86) and a much higher HT Score (95.65 vs. SHR’s 46.60). This suggests a platform that’s more aligned with modern user expectations, emphasizing streamlined workflows, engaging interfaces, and powerful marketing integrations. Do you prioritize proven scalability and detailed control, or prefer a more modern, intuitive user interface?
If your hotel requires deep customization, extensive integrations, and a focus on detailed revenue management, SHR BE is the ideal choice. Its 43 exclusive features—including gift vouchers, special offers, and form autofill—support complex pricing strategies and diverse guest experiences, making it suitable for luxury, boutique, or branded hotels with sophisticated operational needs.
On the other hand, if your hotel needs an easy-to-operate platform that emphasizes guest engagement and quick implementation, Profitroom is preferable. Its intuitive interface, strong marketing tools, and high user ratings for ease of use (4.73/5) make it ideal for mid-sized hotels, resorts, and properties prioritizing rapid growth and guest conversion without extensive technical complexity.
SHR BE’s ease of use scores (4.67/5) are slightly lower than Profitroom’s (4.73/5), reflecting a more complex interface that may require dedicated onboarding. SHR reviews mention a learning curve and backend navigation improvements, though users praise its customization capabilities once mastered.
Profitroom consistently receives praise for its user-friendly design, rapid onboarding, and clear workflows, making staff adoption smoother. With a recent review highlighting its straightforward management tools, it’s evident that Profitroom prioritizes ease and speed of use. Edge: Profitroom.
SHR BE offers 43 shared features plus three exclusive features—special offers, gift vouchers, and form autofill—that provide unique flexibility for targeted campaigns and revenue strategies. Its features cater to complex rate management, personalized guest messaging, and detailed analytics, supporting a wide range of operational requirements.
Profitroom, with a slightly smaller feature set, makes up for it with its focus on marketing automation, website customization, and intuitive upselling tools. It provides an engaging booking experience that can directly influence conversions. Edge: SHR Booking Engine, for its comprehensive feature set and customization options.
SHR Group consistently receives high praise for support (4.86/5), with reviews emphasizing their proactive, knowledgeable, and responsive nature. Customers highlight support team responsiveness and ongoing onboarding assistance as key strengths.
Profitroom support scores slightly lower at 4.6/5 but still garners positive feedback for helpfulness and professionalism. Some reviews note slower response times and room for improvement in support responsiveness, especially during system setup. Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR BE boasts 81 verified partners, with key integrations across PMS, channel managers, CRM, and additional tech, giving it a broad reach. Shared integrations include major platforms like Apaleo, TrustYou, and WebRezPro, with many unique partners supporting complex hotel ecosystems.
Profitroom offers 66 verified integrations, including popular platforms like Amadeus, Airbnb, and Expedia, but it has fewer partner options overall. Its focus remains on seamless integration with property management and channel systems, though SHR’s wider partner network provides more flexibility. Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
Recent reviews indicate that Profitroom’s higher overall rating (4.76 vs. SHR’s 4.86) and recent review activity (21 reviews in last six months) give it a slight edge in perceived value and user satisfaction. Hotels across various segments, especially resorts and mid-sized properties, rate Profitroom highly for ease of use and marketing support.
However, SHR’s review count and 96% likelihood to recommend signal a strong, loyal user base, especially among boutique and city center hotels. For recent performance and modern features, Profitroom holds the upper hand.
SHR BE’s pricing details are not publicly available, suggesting a custom quote approach based on hotel size and needs. Its lack of a freemium or trial indicates a tailored, enterprise-level solution.
Profitroom charges a base price of $600 per month, with no freemium or trial offered. Cost may vary depending on additional modules and integrations, but it’s generally positioned as an accessible option for mid-sized hotels and chains.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, prefers quick setup, or values a straightforward user interface. It’s suitable for properties with dedicated technical resources and sophisticated operational goals.
Not ideal if your hotel needs highly complex revenue management tools or extensive integrations with niche systems. It’s best for properties focused on rapid growth and guest satisfaction.
Core Difference: SHR BE offers extensive customization, deep integrations, and detailed revenue management tools, aiming at larger or more complex hotel portfolios. Profitroom, meanwhile, emphasizes ease of use, guest engagement, and marketing automation, making it ideal for mid-sized hotels seeking quick results.
When to choose SHR BE: If your hotel requires precise control over pricing, extensive system integrations, and detailed analytics, SHR is the better fit. Its comprehensive feature set is designed for properties with larger operational complexity and technical support.
When to choose Profitroom: If your hotel values simplicity, engaging guest interfaces, and faster onboarding, Profitroom stands out. Its intuitive platform and recent high ratings make it suitable for hotels prioritizing guest conversion and rapid growth.
Final verdict: For most hotels with recent reviews and a broader user base, Profitroom’s modern interface and strong recent performance make it the more compelling choice. SHR Booking Engine remains a solid option for large, complex operations needing tailored control.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,SHR Booking Engine (BE) 和 Profitroom Booking Engine 360 共享 43 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 礼品券和预付体验 | ||
| 表单自动填充 |
我们分析了 12 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
"We love how keen Profitroom are to adopt feedback. We needed an ‘out of the box’ solution so ultimately chose Profitroom as they’re always evolving the system to our changing indus..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We chose to cooperate with Profitroom because you are absolutely the best in Poland, and there is no other company that matches your technological prowess. Indeed, working with you..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软... 用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软件的使用非常有价值。30 篇评论涵盖了此主题。
经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,... 经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,一些用户希望改进与其他系统和平台的集成。此主题出现在 18 篇评论中。
用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的... 用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的导航有助于提高整体效率。此主题在 20 条评论中被提及。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户指出,虽然前端很人性化,但后端导航和过滤选项可以更加直观和人性化。这些方面的改进可以显著提高效率和用户满意度。此主题在 12 条评论中被提及。
一些用户建议可以改进预订引擎的视觉美感。增强用户界面的精致和现代设计可以进一步提升整体预订体验,并使其更具视觉吸引力。6 篇评论讨论了此主题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Profitroom预订引擎的集成能力普遍受到好评,能够提升与其他系统(如PMS和RMS)的用户体验。然而,一些评论指出,这些集成的无缝性和配置过程仍有改进空间,表明... Profitroom预订引擎的集成能力普遍受到好评,能够提升与其他系统(如PMS和RMS)的用户体验。然而,一些评论指出,这些集成的无缝性和配置过程仍有改进空间,表明需要加快实施速度并增强端到端的系统连接性。
While users generally find Profitroom's customer support team helpful and resourceful, there are recurring mentions of delays in response times, parti... While users generally find Profitroom's customer support team helpful and resourceful, there are recurring mentions of delays in response times, particularly concerning ticket resolutions. Some users have suggested the need for an improved phone support line and faster issue resolution to enhance the user experience.
该平台的注册流程和易用性经常受到好评。客户认为该系统直观易懂,有助于酒店不同员工快速上手。有效的培训资源也进一步促进了系统的顺利过渡和易用性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Profitroom 的报告和分析功能褒贬不一。用户赞赏其为决策和营销活动提供的洞察,但他们也希望获得更高级、更易用的报告功能,并建议改进报告的自定义和即时性。
Profitroom 以其多语言和多币种支持而闻名,尤其适合服务国际用户。这一特性增强了平台的易用性,使其成为拥有多元化客户群体的酒店的理想选择。
排名更高的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 和 Profitroom Booking Engine 360 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Profitroom Booking Engine 360 提供 66 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Booking Engine (BE):否。Profitroom Booking Engine 360:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 45,Profitroom 的为 95。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问