The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 76 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 369 条评价 | #39 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 39 条评价 | #36 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 16 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 232 条评价 | #40 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 320 条评价 | #41 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 166 条评价 | #41 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 32 条评价 | #38 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 39 条评价 | #31 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 440 条评价 | #38 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #15 11 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #16 3 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is critical to maximizing your direct bookings, revenue, and guest experience. Both SHR Booking Engine by SHR Group and Planet Booking Engine aim to streamline this process, but their approaches and track records differ significantly. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, support needs, and the features that matter most.
While Planet's small number of reviews and limited recent feedback offer less confidence, SHR Group's extensive, recent, and positive review profile provides a clearer picture of performance. Which platform will really meet your hotel’s needs?
Both SHR and Planet address the core issue of converting website visitors into bookings with online reservation solutions. SHR’s platform emphasizes customization, robust features, and integration, while Planet focuses on providing a straightforward, easy-to-use booking process.
However, SHR’s platform scores a 4.86/5 overall rating based on 339 reviews, with recent feedback in the last six months. Planet, on the other hand, has only 3 reviews—one from August 2023—and a 0/5 overall rating, which diminishes confidence in its current reliability and support quality.
The key divergence lies in customer support and feature depth. SHR’s customers praise its proactive, knowledgeable support and feature-rich environment, while Planet's limited recent reviews and poor ratings suggest unresolved issues and a lack of ongoing development.
If your hotel needs a proven, well-supported booking engine with extensive features, SHR is the safer choice. Are you willing to risk less stability and support with Planet?
If your hotel is a mid-to-large property requiring advanced features, multiple integrations, and dedicated support, SHR is the better fit. Its feature set includes mobile responsiveness, A/B testing, special offers, loyalty integrations, and multi-lingual/multi-currency support—features only available in SHR’s platform.
For small hotels or independent operators with minimal needs, Planet offers a simple, no-frills booking experience. However, with only three reviews and a recent rating of 1/5, Planet’s platform has shown signs of instability and limited support, making SHR the more reliable choice for long-term growth.
Hotels seeking scalability, customization, and proven performance should lean toward SHR. Those with basic, budget-conscious needs might consider Planet, but the limited evidence casts doubt on its current viability.
SHR’s platform boasts a 4.67/5 ease of use rating from 339 reviews, with users describing it as intuitive and straightforward once familiar with the system. Support and onboarding are rated at 4.63/5, and many hotels highlight the helpful onboarding process and user-friendly interface, even praising its ability to accommodate complex rate plans.
Planet’s ease of use, however, is rated only 1.67/5 by the scant reviews, with one user criticizing its interface as “clunky” and “not intuitive,” especially for multi-language and international use. The lack of recent positive feedback further suggests ongoing usability challenges.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine
SHR offers 46 exclusive features not found in Planet, including mobile optimization, A/B testing, urgency messaging, pooled inventory, pre- and post-stay emails, gift vouchers, multi-room bookings, loyalty program integration, and social media booking support. These features cater to a range of marketing, revenue, and operational needs.
Planet’s platform appears to have no unique features beyond basic booking functions, focusing on simplicity rather than flexibility. The absence of advanced tools means SHR is clearly the feature leader, especially for hotels needing sophisticated control and marketing tools.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine
Customer support and onboarding ratings heavily favor SHR, with a 4.86/5 rating from 339 reviews, and praise for proactive, knowledgeable service. Hoteliers report quick responses, helpful account managers, and effective resolution of issues, making support a standout strength.
Planet’s customer support score is only 1/5 based on 3 reviews, with complaints about unresponsiveness, ongoing issues, and a lack of support during critical moments. This significant gap suggests that if support quality is a priority, SHR exceeds expectations.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine
SHR boasts 81 verified partners, with integrations spanning critical hotel systems like PMS, channel managers, and payment providers. Shared integrations include Cendyn, GuestRevu, and others, with additional partners like Criton and WebRezPro exclusive to SHR.
Planet offers 195 verified partners, but a closer look reveals many are unrelated to core hotel operations and have limited integration depth. Shared partners include major PMS and channel tools, but the overall ecosystem appears less mature and tested.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine
SHR’s reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.86/5 rating from 339 recent reviews, and a 96% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across various segments, especially boutique, city center, and resort properties, praise its reliability, features, and support.
Planet’s minimal reviews and a 0/5 score, combined with recent criticism, provide no confidence in its current performance or hotel satisfaction levels. Users are clearly more satisfied with SHR’s platform, especially in recent feedback.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine
Pricing details for both platforms are not publicly disclosed, which is common in enterprise hotel systems. Typically, pricing depends on hotel size, features, and support needs, making direct comparison challenging.
However, SHR’s robust features and support suggest a higher, value-driven investment, whereas Planet’s basic approach might appeal to hotels seeking minimal upfront costs—though its performance issues could offset initial savings.
Not ideal if you:
Not ideal if you:
In summary, SHR Booking Engine is the stronger choice for hotels looking for a feature-rich, well-supported, and proven platform. Its extensive review base, recent positive feedback, and comprehensive capabilities make it the clear leader.
Planet’s minimal and outdated reviews, combined with its poor recent ratings, suggest it’s not a reliable option for hotels aiming for growth or operational efficiency.
Choose SHR if your hotel values stability, advanced features, and proactive support.
Consider Planet only if your needs are basic, your budget is tight, and you’re willing to accept potential reliability issues.
Ultimately, SHR represents a safer, more scalable solution with a track record of success. For your hotel’s revenue and guest experience, it’s the platform you can trust to deliver consistent results.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软... 用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软件的使用非常有价值。30 篇评论涵盖了此主题。
经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,... 经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,一些用户希望改进与其他系统和平台的集成。此主题出现在 18 篇评论中。
用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的... 用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的导航有助于提高整体效率。此主题在 20 条评论中被提及。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户指出,虽然前端很人性化,但后端导航和过滤选项可以更加直观和人性化。这些方面的改进可以显著提高效率和用户满意度。此主题在 12 条评论中被提及。
一些用户建议可以改进预订引擎的视觉美感。增强用户界面的精致和现代设计可以进一步提升整体预订体验,并使其更具视觉吸引力。6 篇评论讨论了此主题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 和 Planet Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Planet Booking Engine 提供 194 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 1.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Booking Engine (BE):否。Planet Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 46,Planet 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问