The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 网站设计 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
ennit |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 30 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 208 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
ennit |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 115 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 163 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 84 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
ennit |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #11 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 244 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right website design platform is a critical step for your hotel to improve online visibility, user experience, and direct bookings. Both SHR Website Design by SHR Group and ennit aim to serve hotel websites, but their offerings and market presence differ substantially. Your decision hinges on which product aligns best with your hotel's size, complexity, and growth ambitions. Do you prioritize proven scale, extensive features, and support, or are you exploring a simpler, perhaps less established alternative?
SHR Website Design and ennit both aim to enhance your hotel’s online presence, but SHR has a clear advantage given its larger review base and recent data. SHR boasts a 4.87/5 overall rating from 169 reviews, with high marks across ease of use, customer support, and value, while ennit has no reviews or ratings to date. The strength of SHR lies in its proven track record, with hotels valuing its impactful designs, marketing tools, and seamless integration capabilities.
enIt, on the other hand, remains unreviewed, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or real-world performance. Without recent reviews or customer feedback, ennit’s ability to meet your hotel’s specific needs remains uncertain. So which platform is more likely to deliver consistent results for your property?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, well-supported website platform with proven results, SHR Website Design is the clear choice. Its robust feature set—such as ADA compliance, SEO plugins, customizable themes, and integrations with 81 verified partners—caters to hotels seeking a flexible, scalable solution.
For smaller hotels or those experimenting with website design without a need for extensive features, ennit might seem appealing. However, given the lack of reviews or user data, it’s risky to rely solely on its claims. Your best bet for predictable outcomes is SHR, especially if your hotel aims for growth and a strong digital presence.
SHR Website Design scores a 4.69/5 in ease of use, with positive reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and efficient onboarding process. Users highlight that the platform is accessible and straightforward, though some note the complexity of certain advanced features, requiring some training.
ennit doesn't provide any review data or user feedback, making it impossible to assess its usability. The absence of documented user experiences tips the scale in favor of SHR, which has consistently satisfied clients with its user-friendly approach.
Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR Website Design offers 14 exclusive features including ADA compliance, SSL security protocols, Google Analytics integration, mobile responsiveness, a drag-and-drop page builder, customizable themes, social media integrations, and SEO plugins. These features are specifically tailored for hotel websites, helping properties stand out and rank well organically.
enniit has no listed features or unique offerings, making it difficult to compare. Without concrete feature data, SHR’s comprehensive, hotel-specific capabilities give it a decisive advantage.
Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR boasts a 4.85/5 support rating from reviews, with customers praising its prompt, knowledgeable, and proactive support team. Clients appreciate the high-touch service with account managers who regularly provide strategic advice and technical assistance.
Since ennit provides no review data or support ratings, the safety net of reliable customer service remains unverified. In the hospitality industry where support can be crucial, SHR’s proven support system makes it the stronger choice.
Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR offers 81 verified integration partners, including PMS, marketing tools, and other hotel tech solutions such as Criton, Priority Software, Right Revenue, and OpenHotel. This extensive partner network facilitates smooth operations and allows your property to connect with systems you already use.
enniit has no listed integrations or partner data, which could limit its flexibility and interoperability. If seamless connectivity is vital for your hotel’s digital ecosystem, SHR’s integrations are unmatched.
Edge: SHR Website Design.
Given the available data, SHR’s hotels rate the platform highly, with a 4.87/5 overall score, and reviews praising its impact on revenue and user experience. Its reviews are recent, and the 96% likelihood to recommend indicates strong satisfaction among diverse hotel types.
ennit, lacking reviews entirely, provides no basis for hotel ratings. Without user feedback, SHR’s reputation and proven performance tip the scale strongly in its favor.
Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR Website Design starts at $900, with no mention of freemiums, monthly fees, or implementation costs. The pricing appears transparent and straightforward for a full hotel website solution.
ennit’s pricing is not available, leaving potential users uncertain about costs or value. Without transparent pricing, it’s challenging to evaluate ROI or compare investment levels, reinforcing SHR’s advantage.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that SHR offers a proven, feature-rich, and well-supported platform for hotel websites, backed by extensive reviews and a large user base. ennit, lacking reviews and detailed features, remains an unverified option with uncertain performance.
If your hotel values reliability, comprehensive features, and a track record of success, SHR should be your choice. It supports a wide range of hotel types, has proven ROI, and delivers ongoing support—key for hotels aiming for growth.
Choose SHR if you want consistency, proven results, and an established network of integrations and support. If you’re only experimenting or have minimal digital needs, ennit may be worth a closer look once more data becomes available.
This comparison underscores the importance of support, features, and proven performance for your hotel’s website solution. Given SHR’s superior review data, feature set, and industry presence, it remains the safer, more reliable option for ambitious hoteliers.
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户对敬业的客户管理团队积极主动、响应迅速的支持表示赞赏。客户经理通常被描述为知识渊博、致力于客户成功,并随时提供见解和建议以推动业务增长。
SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客... SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客户表示需要更灵活的定制和更快的周转时间。
SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和... SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和绩效跟踪至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
SRH Group 实施的优惠券系统收到的评价褒贬不一。虽然评价认为该系统可以增加收入,但一些用户也指出了可以改进的地方,包括更简单的优惠券管理和部分兑换。
虽然 SRH Group 的模板通常因其视觉吸引力而受到称赞,但一些用户发现它们具有限制性,并希望有更多的定制选项来更好地反映其独特的品牌形象。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Website Design 和 ennit 共享许多核心 Website Design 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Website Design 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ennit 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Website Design 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Website Design:否。ennit:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Website Design 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 43,ennit 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问