The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 网站设计 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 30 条评价 | #29 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 208 条评价 | #22 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | #15 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 1 条评价 | #13 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 115 条评价 | #23 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 163 条评价 | #18 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 84 条评价 | #19 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | #15 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #11 8 条评价 | #21 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 244 条评价 | #25 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | #14 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #2 4 条评价 |
Choosing between SHR Website Design by SHR Group and RateTiger Website Design by eRevMax depends on your hotel’s priorities—whether you value extensive features and proven customer satisfaction or a more streamlined, cost-effective web solution. Both products aim to improve your online presence, but they approach it differently. SHR Group offers a highly-rated, comprehensive platform with extensive integration and customization, while eRevMax focuses on responsive design and seamless distribution. Which aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
Both platforms focus on elevating your hotel's online booking potential, but SHR Group’s offering is backed by a higher volume of recent reviews and a stronger overall rating. SHR’s 169 reviews with a 4.87/5 rating and a 96% likelihood to recommend indicate a well-established, trusted solution. Conversely, eRevMax’s limited four reviews and a 0/5 overall rating suggest a less proven track record. Are you comfortable with a newer, less-reviewed platform, or do you prefer a solution with proven satisfaction?
SHR Group’s platform emphasizes a customized, guest-centric website, with features like SEO plugins, popups & alerts, and fully customizable themes, all designed to boost engagement. eRevMax, by contrast, offers responsive design, content management, and search engine optimization but lacks the depth of customization options and user testimonials. Does your hotel need extensive control and proven success, or is a straightforward responsive website enough?
Finally, SHR’s extensive review base and recent feedback show ongoing customer satisfaction, while eRevMax’s reviews are outdated or lacking. When considering risk, do you want a platform with a solid reputation or one with limited, less recent endorsements?
Edge: SHR Group
If your hotel needs a custom-built, highly adaptable website with integrated marketing tools and a proven track record, SHR Group is your choice. Its features like SEO plugins, drag-and-drop builders, and fully customizable themes cater well to hotels seeking a distinctive online presence. On the other hand, if your priority is a simple, mobile-optimized site that syncs effortlessly with your PMS or channel manager, RateTiger provides a straightforward, cost-effective solution.
For hotels with a focus on maximizing direct bookings, SHR’s in-depth integrations and extensive features make it the better match. Conversely, for properties that want a quick, responsive website with minimal fuss, RateTiger’s streamlined approach serves them better.
In short, choose SHR if you value extensive customization and a trusted reputation. Opt for RateTiger if your hotel seeks a basic, responsive website optimized for distribution.
Edge: SHR Group
SHR Group’s platform boasts a user rating of 4.69/5 for ease of use, based on detailed reviews praising its user-friendly interface and intuitive management tools. Many hoteliers highlight its straightforward onboarding process and effective support, despite some mention of a learning curve for advanced features.
eRevMax is rated at 4.25/5 for usability, with reviews indicating its design is responsive and easy to handle, particularly for those familiar with digital tools. Users praise its quick setup and smooth content management but note that some features could be more intuitive.
Edge: SHR Group
SHR Group provides 7 exclusive features, including a booking engine, customizable attractions maps, website personalization, popups & alerts, drag-and-drop page builder, fully customizable themes, and SEO plugins. These tools focus on creating a tailored, guest-friendly website designed to boost conversions.
eRevMax offers a broader suite of 28 features, such as mobile responsiveness, A/B testing, pooled inventory, automated reporting, various email campaigns, multi-currency, multi-lingual support, loyalty integrations, and social media bookings. These features facilitate distribution, marketing, and customer engagement at a high level.
Given the feature count, eRevMax’s platform caters to hotels seeking comprehensive, all-in-one solutions. SHR’s focus on customization and user experience makes it suitable for hotels that prioritize unique branding and targeted engagement.
Edge: eRevMax
SHR Group’s customer support scores an impressive 4.85/5, with reviews emphasizing prompt, knowledgeable, and proactive assistance. Clients frequently mention dedicated account managers, especially praising the responsiveness and personalized guidance that help optimize their online presence.
eRevMax’s support rating is 4.25/5, with reviews citing helpful support but noting occasional delays or limitations in technical assistance. The reviews suggest that while support is generally good, it may not be as consistently attentive or personalized as SHR’s.
Edge: SHR Group
SHR Group integrates with 81 verified partners, including major brands like Visual Matrix PMS, TrustYou, and The Hotels Network, offering extensive compatibility. Its integrations cover PMS, channel managers, review platforms, and marketing tools, making it a versatile choice.
eRevMax supports 70 verified partners, including prominent names like Kwentra, GuestCentric, and ROIBACK. While slightly fewer, its integrations also span PMS, channel management, and marketing, but with potentially less flexibility.
Based on the number and diversity of partners, SHR’s platform offers broader connectivity, reducing integration hurdles for complex hotel ecosystems.
Edge: SHR Group
HOTELIERS rate SHR Group significantly higher, with an overall score of 4.87/5 based on 169 reviews, and a 96% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments, especially city center and resort properties, praise its easy use, support, and measurable ROI.
eRevMax’s limited reviews and a 0/5 overall rating suggest it lacks the same level of user satisfaction and proven performance. The few reviews mention ease of dealing with the platform but not the same enthusiasm or consistency in support and results.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, SHR is clearly the more trusted choice.
Edge: SHR Group
SHR Group prices its platform at $900 per month, with no additional implementation or trial fees. Its pricing reflects its comprehensive feature set, customization options, and extensive integrations.
eRevMax does not publicly disclose exact pricing, indicating it may vary or require custom quotes. This lack of transparency can make budgeting more challenging but suggests a potentially flexible or premium pricing model.
For clarity and a known investment, SHR’s transparent pricing provides better value for hotels seeking predictable costs.
Shr Group’s Website Design is a well-established, highly-rated platform offering extensive customization, integrations, and dedicated support, making it suitable for hotels aiming for a distinctive and effective online presence. Its 169 recent reviews and 4.87/5 score underline its stability and customer satisfaction, especially for properties seeking to maximize direct bookings and brand differentiation.
In contrast, RateTiger’s platform provides a responsive, easy-to-manage website with a focus on distribution and operational efficiency. Its limited reviews and lack of recent feedback suggest it’s less proven, but for smaller hotels or those prioritizing straightforward website functionality, it might suffice.
For most hotels that value proven success, customer satisfaction, and extensive features, SHR Website Design offers a more reliable, scalable, and supported solution. Opt for RateTiger if your needs are minimal, budget-conscious, or centered on distribution rather than branding.
Edge: SHR Group
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,SHR Website Design 和 RateTiger Website Design (by eRevMax) 共享 7 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 可定制的景点地图 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 完全可定制的主题 | ||
| 弹出窗口和警报 | ||
| 拖放页面构建器 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 网站个性化 | ||
| 自动报告 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 23 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户对敬业的客户管理团队积极主动、响应迅速的支持表示赞赏。客户经理通常被描述为知识渊博、致力于客户成功,并随时提供见解和建议以推动业务增长。
SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客... SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客户表示需要更灵活的定制和更快的周转时间。
SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和... SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和绩效跟踪至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
SRH Group 实施的优惠券系统收到的评价褒贬不一。虽然评价认为该系统可以增加收入,但一些用户也指出了可以改进的地方,包括更简单的优惠券管理和部分兑换。
虽然 SRH Group 的模板通常因其视觉吸引力而受到称赞,但一些用户发现它们具有限制性,并希望有更多的定制选项来更好地反映其独特的品牌形象。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Website Design 和 RateTiger Website Design (by eRevMax) 共享许多核心 Website Design 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Website Design 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RateTiger Website Design (by eRevMax) 提供 70 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Website Design 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Website Design:否。RateTiger Website Design (by eRevMax):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Website Design 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 43,eRevMax 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问