The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 网站设计 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 30 条评价 | #26 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 208 条评价 | #17 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | #13 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 1 条评价 | #7 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 115 条评价 | #20 3 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 163 条评价 | #17 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 84 条评价 | #14 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | #16 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #11 8 条评价 | #27 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 244 条评价 | #17 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | #5 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #8 1 条评价 |
Choosing a website design platform is critical for your hotel's online presence. Both SHR Website Design by SHR Group and Roiback | Hotel Web Development aim to boost your digital footprint, but they approach this goal differently. While SHR Group offers a broad suite of tools with extensive reviews backing its performance, Roiback's website development service is less reviewed but emphasizes visual appeal and user engagement. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s specific needs?
Both products aim to improve your website's aesthetics, functionality, and conversion rates. SHR Group’s platform is more comprehensive, integrating advanced features and a data-driven approach, whereas Roiback focuses on creating visually compelling websites designed to inspire bookings from first click. Are you looking for a proven, review-backed solution or a tailored, design-focused approach?
SHR Website Design is ideal if your hotel needs a data-driven, feature-rich platform with proven performance and extensive support. It caters to a wide range of hotel types, from boutique to city center and resort properties, with a strong track record reflected in 169 recent reviews and a 4.87/5 overall rating. Its key strengths are advanced customization, SEO tools, and robust integrations, making it suitable for hotels aiming for a sophisticated digital presence.
Roiback, by contrast, is better suited for hotels prioritizing high-quality visual design and user experience. Although it has only 8 reviews with no recent feedback, its focus on inspiring visitors and converting interest aligns well with properties that want an eye-catching online showcase. It’s a good fit if your hotel values aesthetic appeal and visitor engagement over extensive technical features. Which approach do you prioritize: data-backed features or visual engagement?
SHR Group’s platform boasts a high ease-of-use score of 4.69/5, backed by positive reviews praising its support and onboarding process. However, some users find its CMS somewhat complex, especially with image uploads and page setup, which could require additional training. Overall, its interface is designed to suit users familiar with digital marketing and website management.
Roiback’s interface scores 4.5/5, with users highlighting its intuitive design and straightforward management. Its creative approach simplifies the process of translating hotel features into visually appealing websites, making it easier for hotels with less technical expertise to manage their sites. For ease of management, Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group offers 14 unique features, including drag-and-drop page builders, fully customizable themes, and SEO plugins—tools that give your team extensive control over your website’s design and optimization. Its focus on customization and SEO makes it suitable for hotels wanting to tailor their digital presence extensively.
Roiback provides 10 features, emphasizing visual design and conversion tools like strategically placed call-to-actions and destination highlights. Its features are optimized for inspiring interest and converting visitors quickly, but it lacks some of the advanced SEO and customization options found in SHR.
Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group’s support scores 4.85/5, with reviews emphasizing prompt, knowledgeable, and proactive assistance. Clients like Windward Management and Woodlands Hotel praise their support team for quick responses and expert guidance, which helps streamline onboarding and ongoing management.
Roiback’s support scores 4.38/5, with reviews highlighting friendly, professional service. Users appreciate its responsiveness but note that the support experience isn’t as extensively reviewed or detailed as SHR’s. For more reliable, well-documented support, Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group boasts 81 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, YieldPlanet, and RateGain. Its extensive ecosystem allows your hotel to connect multiple systems—PMS, channel managers, marketing tools—creating a unified digital environment.
Roiback offers 27 verified partners, including familiar names like GuestCentric, STAAH, and Winhotel. While its integration options are solid, they are fewer and less diverse than SHR’s, potentially limiting flexibility for complex tech stacks.
Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group’s reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.87/5 overall rating and 96% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers in all segments—from boutique to city center hotels—appreciate its extensive features, ease of support, and proven results, especially in recent reviews.
Roiback, despite its limited review count, has an 84% likelihood to recommend, with feedback emphasizing its visual appeal and user-friendly management. However, the lack of recent reviews and fewer total ratings make SHR’s reputation more compelling. Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no trial or implementation fees, offering a clear, predictable cost structure. Pricing for Roiback is not publicly available, which makes direct comparisons difficult, but the lack of transparency could suggest a more bespoke or variable fee structure.
If predictable costs are essential, SHR’s transparent pricing offers peace of mind. Roiback’s pricing is less transparent, so consider this when evaluating value.
Not ideal if your hotel is small with minimal digital marketing needs or has budget constraints, as the platform’s sophistication and price point may be more than necessary.
Not ideal if your hotel needs deep customization, extensive integrations, or advanced SEO tools.
SHR Website Design is a comprehensive, review-backed platform with a strong reputation for boosting direct bookings through advanced features, extensive integrations, and data-driven design. Its broad feature set and support make it suitable for hotels seeking a customizable, scalable digital presence, especially those with larger budgets.
Roiback excels at creating visually attractive websites that inspire interest and quick conversions. Its simple management and design focus are perfect for smaller hotels or properties that want to emphasize destination appeal without extensive technical complexity.
Choose SHR if you value proven performance, extensive features, and support. Opt for Roiback if your priority is compelling design and straightforward management, especially for properties emphasizing destination marketing.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The new website offers a more agile, intuitive, and personalized user experience. We wanted our website to reflect our corporate identity, our hotels, and our differential value pr..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户对敬业的客户管理团队积极主动、响应迅速的支持表示赞赏。客户经理通常被描述为知识渊博、致力于客户成功,并随时提供见解和建议以推动业务增长。
SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客... SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客户表示需要更灵活的定制和更快的周转时间。
SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和... SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和绩效跟踪至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
SRH Group 实施的优惠券系统收到的评价褒贬不一。虽然评价认为该系统可以增加收入,但一些用户也指出了可以改进的地方,包括更简单的优惠券管理和部分兑换。
虽然 SRH Group 的模板通常因其视觉吸引力而受到称赞,但一些用户发现它们具有限制性,并希望有更多的定制选项来更好地反映其独特的品牌形象。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Website Design 和 Roiback | Hotel Web Development 共享许多核心 Website Design 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Website Design 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Hotel Web Development 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Website Design 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Website Design:否。Roiback | Hotel Web Development:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Website Design 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 43,ROIBACK 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问