The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 网站设计 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 30 条评价 | #30 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 208 条评价 | #28 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | #14 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 1 条评价 | #10 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 115 条评价 | #30 0 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 163 条评价 | #29 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 84 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | #20 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #11 8 条评价 | #20 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 244 条评价 | #18 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | — |
When it comes to selecting a website design platform for your hotel, the choice hinges on what your team values most: comprehensive features, ease of use, or proven performance backed by recent reviews. SHR Website Design by SHR Group and RoomOnline (DINGUS) by Dingus both aim to boost your hotel’s online visibility and direct bookings but approach the challenge differently. SHR Group offers a well-established, highly-rated solution with extensive user feedback, whereas Dingus provides a more straightforward booking engine with fewer recent reviews. Which aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Both SHR Group and Dingus aim to improve your hotel’s digital presence and increase direct bookings, but they differ significantly in their approach and scope. SHR Group’s platform is a dedicated website design solution with a focus on customization, SEO, and marketing integrations, supported by 169 recent reviews averaging 4.87/5. Dingus, however, primarily centers on a booking engine with 0 recent reviews, indicating limited current adoption or feedback. Given the review data, SHR Group clearly has the more validated track record. Are you looking for a proven, highly-rated website solution or a simpler booking tool?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive website that combines aesthetic flexibility, marketing tools, and proven support, SHR Group is the clear choice. Its extensive features, including ADA compliance, customizable themes, and SEO plugins, make it ideal for properties seeking a tailored online presence. On the other hand, if your hotel only requires a straightforward reservation system to facilitate direct bookings without extensive design or marketing needs, Dingus might suffice. However, with no recent reviews or rating data, the decision favors SHR for reliability and proven performance.
SHR Group’s platform boasts a user-friendly UI rated 4.69/5, with onboarding rated 4.66/5, and a wealth of positive feedback emphasizing support and ease of use. Reviewers appreciate how intuitive the interface is and how supportive the onboarding process has been, with some noting the platform’s complex features requiring training. Dingus’s booking engine claims simplicity with a 3-step process and a self-editable CMS, but lacks recent reviews to substantiate ease of use claims. Edge: SHR.
SHR Group offers 7 shared features plus 7 exclusive tools, such as fully customizable themes, SEO plugins, and popups, allowing for tailored website designs. Dingus provides 16 features, including a multi-language, multi-currency booking engine, CRM API, and dynamic image generation, emphasizing booking management and content flexibility. While Dingus has more features, SHR’s offerings are more focused on design and marketing integrations that directly impact user experience. Edge: Dingus.
SHR Group’s support ratings are exceptional at 4.85/5, with recent reviews praising their prompt, knowledgeable support and proactive account management. Clients like Windward Management commend their support team for driving revenue growth and providing strategic insights. Dingus’s support data is unavailable, making it impossible to compare support quality directly. Given the strong recent feedback for SHR, the support edge goes to SHR Group.
SHR Group integrates with 81 verified partners, including critical systems like Cendyn, RateGain, and Lighthouse, as well as unique integrations with Criton and Profitroom. Dingus offers 35 integrations, including common partners like Winhotel and Seekda, but fewer overall. The broader and more established integration ecosystem of SHR Group makes it more adaptable for hotel tech stacks needing extensive connectivity. Edge: SHR.
SHR Group’s reviews, totaling 169 in the last six months with an overall rating of 4.87/5, demonstrate strong satisfaction across various hotel segments, notably boutique hotels and city center properties. Dingus has no recent reviews, so no current hotel ratings are available. The recent, high-rated reviews for SHR Group reinforce its dominance in hotel satisfaction. Edge: SHR.
SHR Group charges a base price of $900 per month, with no mention of a trial or additional implementation fees. Dingus’s pricing is not publicly available, which complicates direct comparison, but the lack of recent reviews or clear pricing suggests SHR Group’s transparent model offers better value for established hotels. Without concrete data for Dingus, SHR’s pricing is the more reliable benchmark.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Core Difference: SHR Group provides a comprehensive, customizable website platform with proven support and extensive integrations, while Dingus focuses on a simple, efficient booking engine with content management capabilities.
When to Choose SHR Group: If your hotel values a tailored, marketing-optimized website designed to increase visibility and conversions, SHR’s high-rated platform and extensive features make it the safer choice. Its proven support and large user base in key hotel segments further bolster its case.
When to Choose Dingus: If your immediate priority is a straightforward, easy-to-manage reservation system with basic content management, and your hotel has no need for extensive design or marketing features, Dingus might meet your needs. However, the lack of recent reviews limits confidence in its current performance.
Final Note: Given the recent reviews and high ratings, SHR Website Design by SHR Group is the more dependable solution for most hotels seeking a reliable, feature-rich website platform proven to deliver results. Dingus’s offering may appeal to very small hotels or those with minimal online strategy, but the absence of recent data makes SHR the clear leader in this comparison.
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户对敬业的客户管理团队积极主动、响应迅速的支持表示赞赏。客户经理通常被描述为知识渊博、致力于客户成功,并随时提供见解和建议以推动业务增长。
SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客... SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客户表示需要更灵活的定制和更快的周转时间。
SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和... SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和绩效跟踪至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
SRH Group 实施的优惠券系统收到的评价褒贬不一。虽然评价认为该系统可以增加收入,但一些用户也指出了可以改进的地方,包括更简单的优惠券管理和部分兑换。
虽然 SRH Group 的模板通常因其视觉吸引力而受到称赞,但一些用户发现它们具有限制性,并希望有更多的定制选项来更好地反映其独特的品牌形象。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Website Design 和 RoomOnline (DINGUS) 共享许多核心 Website Design 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Website Design 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomOnline (DINGUS) 提供 35 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Website Design 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Website Design:否。RoomOnline (DINGUS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Website Design 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 43,Dingus 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问