The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 73 条经验证的评价后,Hotelogix 用户最看重其 培训和可用性, 客户支持, 报告系统增强功能,而 Infor 用户则强调 报告功能, 预测支持, 用户友好界面。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
培训和可用性
▾
|
+
报告功能
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
预测支持
▾
|
|
+
报告系统增强功能
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
财务报告
▾
|
+
数据分析工具
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
市场细分
▾
|
−
费率建议
▾
|
|
−
夜间审计灵活性
▾
|
−
预测准确度
▾
|
|
−
移动兼容性
▾
|
−
PMS 集成
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 收益管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #18 22 条评价 | #43 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #24 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #25 2 条评价 | #7 19 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #24 0 条评价 | #11 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #26 16 条评价 | #24 19 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #24 10 条评价 | #18 23 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #23 6 条评价 | #15 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #28 2 条评价 | #35 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #30 2 条评价 | #22 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #34 3 条评价 | #28 6 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 18 条评价 | #7 21 条评价 |
| 中东 | #9 3 条评价 | #16 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right revenue management system (RMS) can significantly impact your hotel's financial performance. Hotelogix RMS (formerly AxisRooms) and Infor EzRMS are two leading options, both designed to optimize pricing and streamline revenue strategies. While both platforms aim to improve your business’s profitability, they diverge in focus, features, and user experience. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific needs—so which one is better suited for you?
Hotelogix RMS and Infor EzRMS both address core revenue management challenges—automating pricing, forecasting demand, and integrating with distribution channels. Hotelogix RMS emphasizes simplicity, automation, and ease of use, making it appealing for smaller or mid-sized hotels seeking quick deployment. Conversely, Infor EzRMS offers a feature-rich, highly customizable platform tailored for larger, multi-property chains with complex needs. Do you prioritize straightforward operation or advanced, granular control?
In terms of recent reviews, Hotelogix RMS has garnered more recent feedback—28 reviews with an average rating of 4.13/5—demonstrating active user engagement and ongoing improvements. Infor EzRMS has 39 reviews with a slightly higher rating of 4.46/5 but fewer recent comments, indicating a less current user base. Does your hotel need the latest insights, or do you prefer a platform with a broader feature set?
If your hotel needs a user-friendly RMS with strong automation, real-time pricing, and seamless OTA integration, Hotelogix RMS is the better fit. It’s particularly suitable for boutique hotels, resorts, and properties with limited revenue management staff, emphasizing ease of use and quick onboarding. On the other hand, if your hotel requires deep data analysis, advanced forecasting, multi-property management, and granular control, Infor EzRMS suits larger chains or hotels with dedicated revenue teams.
For smaller properties or those new to revenue management, Hotelogix RMS offers a faster learning curve and more straightforward implementation. Larger hotels with complex operational demands will benefit from Infor EzRMS’s extensive feature set, including automated pricing, content management, and detailed analytics.
Hotelogix RMS scores a near-perfect 4.88/5 for ease of use, supported by reviews praising its intuitive interface, simple navigation, and quick onboarding process. Users appreciate that even non-technical staff find it accessible, with some mentioning training sessions that ease adoption. Conversely, Infor EzRMS ranks 4.49/5, with users noting its comprehensive nature and moderate learning curve. However, some mention that the platform’s depth can be overwhelming for smaller teams.
Review quotes reinforce this: Hotelogix RMS’s support team is praised for proactive, helpful assistance, and the system’s user-friendly design is often highlighted. Edge: Hotelogix RMS.
Infor EzRMS clearly offers more features—29 exclusive functionalities—compared to Hotelogix RMS’s no additional features beyond core revenue management. Infor’s offering includes contact management, client portals, task management, fully automated revenue management, content and file management, and an extensive array of analytics and forecasting tools. These features cater to larger hotels needing detailed control and sophisticated automation.
Hotelogix RMS provides essential revenue management tools like real-time pricing, OTA integration, and revenue reports but lacks the depth of automation and advanced functionalities found in Infor EzRMS. If your hotel demands comprehensive control and analytics, Infor wins on features. Edge: Infor EzRMS.
Hotelogix RMS receives a stellar 4.84/5 for customer support, with reviews highlighting proactive, responsive assistance and excellent onboarding experiences. Users frequently mention the support team’s industry know-how and quick problem resolution, which helps ensure smooth operation.
In contrast, Infor EzRMS scores 4.04/5, with some reviews citing helpful support but also noting occasional delays and challenges in resolving technical issues. Many users of Hotelogix RMS feel supported throughout their journey. Edge: Hotelogix RMS.
Infor EzRMS boasts a significantly larger partner ecosystem, with 113 verified integrations, including major PMS, CRS, and channel management providers like Oracle Hospitality, SiteMinder, and RateGain. Its open API and extensive partner network enable seamless data flow and automation across complex systems.
Hotelogix RMS has 25 verified integrations, including popular partners like HotelRunner and STAAH, but fewer than Infor’s. Both platforms share key integrations with OTAs, but Infor’s broader ecosystem offers more flexibility for larger, multi-system environments. Edge: Infor EzRMS.
Hotelogix RMS, with over 28 recent reviews, maintains a solid 4.13/5 rating, with hotelier segments like boutique and resort hotels rating it highly for ease of use and automation. Its recent reviews emphasize its value for small to mid-sized properties seeking straightforward revenue tools.
Infor EzRMS has 39 reviews and a higher overall rating of 4.46/5, especially appreciated by larger hotel chains and properties managing multiple units. Recent feedback underscores its depth of features, though some note a steep learning curve.
Edge: Infor EzRMS.
Both platforms do not publish explicit pricing details, opting for custom quotes based on property size and needs. Typically, Hotelogix RMS offers a more affordable entry point suited for small to mid-sized hotels, while Infor EzRMS’s extensive feature set aligns with larger enterprise budgets.
Since there are no public prices, your team should request quotes to compare value based on your specific property profile.
If your hotel is small or mid-sized and wants an intuitive system, Hotelogix RMS is a solid choice.
For enterprises or multi-property portfolios, Infor EzRMS offers extensive capabilities.
Hotelogix RMS and Infor EzRMS serve different segments within hospitality. Hotelogix RMS excels in simplicity, ease of use, and customer support, making it suitable for small to mid-sized hotels seeking efficient, automated revenue tools. Infor EzRMS provides a comprehensive, feature-rich platform tailored for larger hotels with complex operational needs.
If your hotel is smaller or new to revenue management, Hotelogix RMS’s straightforward approach and active support make it the better pick. Larger chains with advanced needs will find Infor EzRMS’s automation, depth, and integrations more aligned with their goals.
Ultimately, your choice depends on your property’s size, complexity, and ambition—both are capable, but one may fit your needs better.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Hotelogix 系统的可用性和易学性受到普遍赞赏,其提供的培训也获得好评。用户发现该软件非常人性化,即使对于没有 IT 背景的用户来说也是如此。
Hotelogix 提供的亲力亲为的客户支持一直受到好评。评论者提到,支持代理的积极主动性、快速的问题解决和有用的培训课程有助于提供积极的用户体验。
虽然报告系统普遍受到好评,但一些用户建议进一步改进并提供更多综合报告选项。这些改进可以增加价值,尤其是对于综合多物业管理而言。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
有反馈建议 Hotelogix 应提高其市场细分能力。用户将受益于对不同细分市场(如旅行社和企业客户)的更明确区分,从而更好地管理和分析数据。
一些用户指出,在进行夜间审计后,需要更大的灵活性,例如能够添加或删除错误输入的项目。这种改进将有助于减少错误并提高运营效率。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
EzRMS 的客户支持因其响应能力和效率而受到高度赞扬,特别是在快速解决技术问题方面。不过,有人建议延长支持时间,并针对特定市场设立专门的团队。
EzRMS 的报告套件因其灵活性和深度而受到称赞,可进行全面的数据比较和趋势分析。它对于回顾性和预测性业务监控都很有效,有助于更好地进行战略规划和决策。
该系统为预测提供了广泛的支持,减少了收益经理的手动输入,并提供了可操作的见解。然而,一些用户认为系统的预测有时不准确,需要进一步改进以提高可靠性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
EzRMS 提供详细的费率建议,用户认为这有助于优化收入。但是,一些用户报告称,费率上传的准确性和自动化程度存在困难,并且与其他系统的同步仍有改进空间,以防... EzRMS 提供详细的费率建议,用户认为这有助于优化收入。但是,一些用户报告称,费率上传的准确性和自动化程度存在困难,并且与其他系统的同步仍有改进空间,以防止出现费率差异等问题。
尽管最近算法更新后有所改善,但许多用户仍反映 EzRMS 的预测准确性存在问题。人们普遍认为,尽管该工具功能强大,但预测有时会与实际结果存在很大差异,尤其是... 尽管最近算法更新后有所改善,但许多用户仍反映 EzRMS 的预测准确性存在问题。人们普遍认为,尽管该工具功能强大,但预测有时会与实际结果存在很大差异,尤其是在 COVID-19 疫情等动态条件下。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hotelogix RMS (formerly AxisRooms) 和 Infor EzRMS 共享许多核心 Revenue Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hotelogix RMS (formerly AxisRooms) 提供 25 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor EzRMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Hotelogix RMS (formerly AxisRooms) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hotelogix RMS (formerly AxisRooms):否。Infor EzRMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Revenue Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hotelogix 的 HT Score 为 72,Infor 的为 25。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问