The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Backing the packers 表现出色 .
Infor 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 47 |
在分析了 47 条经验证的评价后,Backing the packers 用户最看重其 ,而 Infor 用户则强调 易于使用, 报告, 一体化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
报告
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化
▾
|
|
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持
▾
|
|
|
−
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
−
更新问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #44 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #25 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #19 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #24 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #28 24 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 26 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #31 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #22 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #24 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #28 1 条评价 |
Your hotel’s management system needs to streamline operations and improve guest experiences. Both "Backing the packers" and "Informat HMS" aim to solve these challenges but approach them differently. "Backing the packers" offers a data-driven platform focused on review analysis, while "Infor HMS" provides a comprehensive property management solution. Which of these aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
The key question is whether your team values AI-powered insights from guest feedback or a robust, operationally focused PMS. Do you want a platform that helps you understand customer sentiment or one that automates reservations, housekeeping, and revenue management?
"Backing the packers" is an AI-driven review analysis platform designed to distill guest feedback into actionable insights. It excels at helping your team understand customer sentiment through natural language processing, but it doesn’t handle core operational functions like reservations or housekeeping. Its focus is on customer experience improvements based on review data.
"Infor HMS" is a full-fledged hotel property management system built to handle operational workflows, including reservations, housekeeping, billing, and revenue management. It offers over 20 features such as guest profiles, online support, and automated night audits, making it ideal for streamlining daily hotel operations.
Both products aim to improve hotel performance but address different pain points. Are you looking to understand what your guests really think or to run your hotel more efficiently? That choice will define which product fits your needs best.
If your hotel needs to improve operational efficiency, automate routine tasks, and manage guest data across multiple channels, "Infor HMS" is the obvious choice. It offers a broad suite of features, including guest profiles, online support, and revenue modules, with a high overall rating of 4.04/5 from 46 recent reviews.
Conversely, if your focus is on analyzing guest reviews and extracting insights to enhance customer satisfaction, "Backing the packers" may seem appealing. However, with zero reviews and a score of 0/5, it lacks recent user feedback and demonstrated effectiveness. For hotels seeking proven operational tools, "Infor HMS" offers a clear advantage.
Given the more recent reviews and higher ratings, "Infor HMS" is the recommended solution for most hotel operators. Its extensive feature set and active user base make it a safer, more reliable choice.
"Backing the packers" scores a 0/5 for ease of use, with no reviews in the last six months—a sign of very limited recent feedback and unclear user experience. Its primary function is AI-driven review analysis, so usability may not be its strong point, especially without concrete user experiences.
"Infor HMS" scores 3.88/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews emphasizing its navigability and straightforward interface. Users appreciate the short onboarding process and mobile capabilities, though some mention that the UI could be more modern.
Edge: Infor HMS.
"Backing the packers" has no unique features listed, focusing solely on review analysis and customer sentiment extraction. Its AI capabilities for summarizing reviews and generating actionable insights are its main selling points, but it lacks operational modules.
"Infor HMS" offers 20 features exclusive to its platform, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, multi-lingual interface, cloud hosting, payment processing, revenue management, and automated night audit. These features directly impact daily hotel operations and revenue.
Edge: Infor HMS.
"Backing the packers" has no available support ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge support quality. Its niche focus on review analysis suggests minimal direct customer support needs.
"Infor HMS" boasts a 4.04/5 support rating based on recent reviews. Hoteliers highlight the responsiveness and professionalism of their support team, describing interactions as "prompt" and "helpful," especially critical during updates or troubleshooting.
Edge: Infor HMS.
"Backing the packers" has no verified integrations, indicating it is primarily a standalone review analysis platform.
"Infor HMS" is integrated with 113 verified partners, including booking engines like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, as well as revenue tools like Fairmas and CRM systems like Customer Alliance. This extensive integration ecosystem simplifies operational workflows and data consistency.
Edge: Infor HMS.
"Backing the packers" has zero reviews, so there’s no recent hotel feedback to consider. Its lack of reviews suggests it’s untested or not widely adopted.
"Infor HMS" has 46 recent reviews with a 4.04/5 overall rating, and users from various segments like independent hotels and branded properties rate it highly. Hotels particularly value its operational features and support responsiveness.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Both products do not list detailed pricing models or fees. "Backing the packers" appears to operate on a custom or undefined pricing structure, likely due to its niche focus.
"Infor HMS" also does not specify costs but typically offers a subscription-based model, with prices varying based on the number of rooms and modules chosen. For precise costs, direct inquiry is necessary.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
"Backing the packers" is designed for review analysis and sentiment insight, but it lacks recent reviews and proven operational capabilities. Its focus is narrow, making it unsuitable as a core management system.
"Infor HMS" is a comprehensive, cloud-based property management system with a solid user base, high ratings, and extensive integrations. It streamlines daily operations, supports revenue growth, and adapts to complex hotel needs.
If your goal is to run your hotel smoothly and improve guest experiences through operational excellence, "Infor HMS" is the clear choice. For insight-driven reputation management, review analysis platforms like Backing the packers" could complement your existing systems but may not replace a PMS.
Final verdict: For most hotels needing a practical, scalable, and well-supported PMS, "Infor HMS" is the safer, more effective option. If guest feedback analysis is your priority, consider integrating a review platform alongside your PMS rather than relying solely on "Backing the packers."
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Backing the packers |
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Backing the packers 和 Infor HMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Backing the packers 和 Infor HMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Backing the packers 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor HMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Backing the packers:否。Infor HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Backing the packers 的 HT Score 为 0,Infor 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问