Backing the packers vs. Shiji Daylight PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 34 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Backing the packers 表现出色 .

Shiji Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Backing the packers 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
75
推荐可能性
0%
90%
易用性
0.0/5
4.6/5
客户支持
0.0/5
4.6/5
性价比
0.0/5
4.5/5
起始价格 Contact sales From $1,200/mo
经验证的评价 0 34

Backing the packers 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 34 条经验证的评价后,Backing the packers 用户最看重其 ,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 易于使用, 支持团队, 执行。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Backing the packers Shiji Group Shiji Group
优点
+ 易于使用
+ 支持团队
+ 执行
+ 培训材料
缺点
报告和分析
系统速度
集成能力

Backing the packers 对比 Shiji Group:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Backing the packers Shiji Group Shiji Group
小型(10-24 间客房) #53 2 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #31 17 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #11 13 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #22 2 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Backing the packers Shiji Group Shiji Group
精品酒店 #33 17 条评价
豪华酒店 #24 25 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #22 19 条评价
长住酒店 #45 2 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Backing the packers Shiji Group Shiji Group
北美 #33 4 条评价
欧洲 #30 8 条评价
亚太 #14 5 条评价
中东 #5 14 条评价

The Decision

Your hotel is evaluating two property management systems: Backing the packers by Backing the packers and Shiji Daylight PMS by Shiji Group. Both aim to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and boost revenue, but they differ significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. Backing the packers is an unestablished platform with no reviews or real-world data, while Shiji Daylight PMS boasts a robust user base, extensive features, and recent positive feedback. Given this disparity, which system aligns best with your hotel’s needs?

Backing the packers offers a minimal, untested platform with no reviews, no recent customer feedback, and no measurable support or integration capabilities. Conversely, Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS has a strong market presence, over 30 recent reviews, and a high NPS score of 8.94/10, indicating substantial customer satisfaction. Is your hotel prepared to rely on a system with no proven track record, or does the recent, positive feedback for Shiji Group provide the confidence you need?

Is Backing the packers or Shiji Daylight PMS Better for Hotels?

Backing the packers claims to be a customer feedback analysis platform that uses AI to interpret review data, yet it lacks any reviews or real-world hotel use cases. Shiji Daylight PMS, however, is a cloud-based hotel management system used globally across diverse property types, from independents to large chains, with 32 recent reviews confirming its operational effectiveness. The absence of user feedback for Backing the packers makes it impossible to gauge real hotel experiences, whereas Shiji’s recent reviews highlight ease of use, detailed reporting, and helpful support.

Backing the packers appears more suited for companies seeking AI-driven insights from customer reviews rather than an operational hotel management system. Meanwhile, Shiji Group’s PMS provides a tangible, tested solution with proven features, support, and regional adaptability. So, does your hotel need a review analysis platform or an actual, functional PMS that hotels rely on daily? The answer seems clear when comparing recent, verified feedback.

Backing the packers vs Shiji Group: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs an established, feature-rich PMS with proven operational benefits and recent positive reviews, go with Shiji Daylight PMS. It’s suitable for hotels seeking detailed guest profiles, automation, integrations, and scalability, supported by over 30 recent reviews and a high NPS score.

If, however, your team is exploring a customer review analysis tool to inform broader strategy or product development, Backing the packers might interest you—though currently, it lacks actual hotel or user feedback. For operational hotel management and real-time support, Shiji’s system is the clear choice based on recent, credible user experiences.

Is Backing the packers or Shiji Group Easier to Use?

Backing the packers has no user ratings or reviews, so its ease of use cannot be assessed. In contrast, Shiji Group’s PMS scores 4.63/5 on ease of use based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface, straightforward training materials, and ease of learning. Multiple reviewers highlight how new staff can quickly become proficient, and the system’s modern design reduces onboarding time.

Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Has Better Features: Backing the packers or Shiji Group?

Backing the packers offers zero distinct features. Shiji Group provides an impressive suite of 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, digital registration, guest messaging, automation tools, integrated payment processing, and robust reporting—many of which are absent in Backing the packers.

This extensive feature set enables operational automation, personalized guest experiences, and seamless integrations. When comparing features, Shiji Group’s PMS clearly outperforms an untested, featureless platform.

Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Backing the packers or Shiji Group?

Backing the packers has no available support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to evaluate. Shiji Group’s support receives a rating of 4.53/5 based on recent reviews, with users describing the support team as professional, responsive, and helpful—key for smooth implementation and ongoing operations.

Recent feedback emphasizes the importance of strong support in resolving technical issues quickly, especially during onboarding and training phases. Without reviews or support data, Backing the packers cannot match Shiji’s support quality.

Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Has More Integrations: Backing the packers or Shiji Group?

Backing the packers has no verified integrations or partner data. Shiji Group, by comparison, offers 64 verified integrations with industry leaders such as SiteMinder, Revinate, Oaky, IDeaS, Duetto, Amadeus, and others, providing extensive connectivity for property management, revenue management, distribution, and guest engagement.

This wide integration ecosystem facilitates operational efficiency and data consistency across systems, a critical advantage for hotels seeking a unified tech stack. The lack of integrations for Backing the packers makes it unsuitable for hotels requiring interconnected systems.

Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Backing the packers or Shiji Group?

Backing the packers has no reviews or ratings. Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS has a recent NPS score of 8.94/10, with hotel segments including luxury, branded, and city hotels rating it highly for ease of use, support, and feature set.

The recent reviews emphasize how user-friendly the system is, with comments like “The support team is always available 24/7,” and “Shiji is very versatile and easy to learn.” This credible, recent feedback underscores the system’s strong reputation among hoteliers.

Edge: Shiji Group.

How Much Do Backing the packers and Shiji Group Cost?

Backing the packers does not publish pricing details, suggesting a potential custom quote or unestablished pricing model. Shiji Group charges a base price of $1,200 per month, with no apparent discounts or trial options.

Given the lack of transparency for Backing the packers, the clear, published pricing for Shiji PMS provides a concrete basis for budgeting and decision-making.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Backing the packers?

  • Hotels interested in AI-driven review analysis tools to understand customer sentiment and improve service.
  • Teams seeking insights from unstructured feedback to inform marketing or product strategies.
  • Hotels without immediate operational needs for a PMS.
  • Hotels with minimal or no existing tech infrastructure seeking basic review insights.

Not ideal if your hotel requires a fully functional, integrated PMS for daily operations, real-time guest management, and staff workflows.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Shiji Group?

  • Hotels of all sizes looking for an all-in-one PMS with extensive features.
  • Properties seeking detailed reporting, automation, and integrations.
  • Hotels aiming for scalability across multiple locations with consistent guest data.
  • Hotels that prioritize support, ease of use, and regional customization.

Not ideal if your hotel operates in a very niche market with highly specialized, regional compliance needs not covered by the system’s current configurations, or if you require a low-cost, minimal system.

Shiji Group vs Backing the packers: The Bottom Line for Hotels

At its core, Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS is a comprehensive, tested property management system that offers a broad array of features, integrations, and recent positive reviews. Backing the packers, by contrast, is an unproven AI review analysis platform with no customer feedback or operational use.

For hotels seeking a reliable, scalable, and well-supported PMS, Shiji Group’s recent reviews and extensive feature set make it the clear choice. If your hotel needs an AI platform purely for customer review insights without operational management, then Backing the packers might be relevant—though its lack of real-world validation limits its current appeal.

In conclusion, unless you’re exploring review analysis tools for strategic insights, Shiji Daylight PMS is the superior option for most hotels wanting a dependable, feature-rich management platform with proven user satisfaction.

Backing the packers 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Backing the packers Shiji Group Shiji Group
Starting Price From $1,200/mo

Backing the packers 有哪些 Shiji Daylight PMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Backing the packers 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Backing the packers Shiji Group Shiji Group
任务管理
多种语言
宾客资料
平板电脑/自助值机
网上值机
集中用户和角色管理

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 86 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Backing the packers 对比 Shiji Group(按业务目标)

我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
Backing the packers

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Shiji Group Ruby Hotels 中型
+ Successfully went live with 21 hotels across Europe, with additional hotel openings planned in the near future.
+ Equipped with the level of API connectivity they needed to create connections between disparate data sets that would be impossible to achieve manually.
+ Mentions of Technology have increased by 2.5 points, Reception by 3 points and Service by 3.5 points.

"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."

Lucas Höfer
Lucas Höfer
Group Director of Systems and Innovation...
改善宾客体验
Backing the packers

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Shiji Group Sunborn London 小型
+ �s fully integrated tech stack, the team unified their data, simplified workflows, and elevated every touchpoint of the guest journey.
+ From seamless check-in and instant mobile ordering to real-time housekeeping updates, everything now runs faster, smoother, and with less effort.
+ Most importantly, technology now works in the background, freeing up staff to focus on what really matters: delivering memorable, personalized experiences that live up to Sunborn

"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."

V
Vasilis Giannios
Operations Manager, Sunborn London

Backing the packers 对比 Shiji Group:总结

Backing the packers
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 0 个集成
查看资料
Shiji Group
Shiji Group
4.5/5 来自 34 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易于使用 97% 正面

用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。

支持团队 83% 正面

石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。

执行 83% 正面

一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

报告和分析 62% 负面

尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。

系统速度 57% 负面

与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。

独特功能

宾客资料 多种语言 集中用户和角色管理 任务管理 平板电脑/自助值机
4.6/5 易用性 4.5/5 客户支持 64 个集成
访问官网

评分差异最大的方面

易用性 Shiji Group 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Shiji Group 4.5 vs 0.0 (+4.5)
性价比 Shiji Group 4.5 vs 0.0 (+4.5)
入职培训 Shiji Group 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)

关于 Backing the packers 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 的常见问题

Backing the packers 能否替代 Shiji Daylight PMS?

这取决于您的需求。Backing the packers 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Backing the packers 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Shiji Daylight PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Backing the packers 或 Shiji Daylight PMS 是否提供免费方案?

Backing the packers:否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Backing the packers 和 Shiji Daylight PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Backing the packers 的 HT Score 为 0,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息