The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 395 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Backing the packers 表现出色 .
ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
基于 HTR 上 395 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 395 |
在分析了 395 条经验证的评价后,Backing the packers 用户最看重其 ,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 客户支持, 运营效率, 数据和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
数据和报告
▾
|
|
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 145 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 25 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #5 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #7 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #7 70 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #7 24 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #11 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #1 386 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #57 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #32 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #32 0 条评价 |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) can feel daunting, especially when the market offers options with vastly different features and customer feedback. Both Backing the packers and ThinkReservations aim to streamline hotel operations, but their approach and market presence differ significantly. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, needs, and how much recent user feedback you want to rely on.
Backing the packers, with no reviews or recent data, leaves your team flying blind. ThinkReservations, on the other hand, boasts over 356 reviews, with recent feedback from the last six months, providing a clearer picture. The question is: which platform aligns better with your operational goals?
Backing the packers is a virtually unreviewed platform with zero publicly available ratings, making it impossible to gauge real user experiences—this leaves your team making a blind choice. Conversely, ThinkReservations has accumulated 356 reviews, with four in the recent six months, offering a solid, up-to-date insight into user satisfaction.
ThinkReservations consistently scores high across all metrics, including an overall rating of 4.88 out of 5 and a customer support rating of 4.82. Meanwhile, Backing the packers has no publicly available ratings, reviews, or user feedback, which raises questions about its market presence and reliability.
The key difference is clear: ThinkReservations’ recent reviews and high ratings make it the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven performance and support. Are you comfortable choosing a platform without any user feedback or recent data?
Edge: ThinkReservations
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, well-supported PMS with proven customer satisfaction, go with ThinkReservations. Its extensive review base, high ratings, and recent positive feedback indicate a mature, reliable product. ThinkReservations is suited for hotels of all sizes but particularly shines when your team values detailed reporting, integrated booking engines, and superior customer support.
If, however, your hotel prefers a platform with no reviews, no recent user data, and no clear market presence, Backing the packers might seem like an option—though this is an extremely risky choice given the lack of evidence of its effectiveness.
For hoteliers who prioritize ease of use, reliable integrations, and a platform with a track record of satisfied users, ThinkReservations is the clear winner. Are you willing to take a chance on an unreviewed system, or do you prefer the confidence of recent, high-rated user experiences?
Edge: ThinkReservations
ThinkReservations boasts a user experience rating of 4.82 out of 5 based on 356 recent reviews, with many users praising its intuitive interface, seamless onboarding, and quick staff adoption. Users describe it as “easy to use,” with onboarding that “took less than a week,” and highlight the platform’s straightforward navigation.
In contrast, Backing the packers has no publicly available usability ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to assess how easy it is for your team to learn and incorporate. Without user feedback or ratings, you risk choosing a platform whose ease of use remains unverified.
Given the data, it’s safe to say ThinkReservations has a proven, highly-rated user experience. Edge: ThinkReservations
ThinkReservations offers 39 features, including channel management, online booking engine, automated night audit, guest profiles, multi-currency support, and integrated payment processing. Many features that support operational automation and revenue growth are built-in, saving your team from third-party integrations.
Backing the packers provides no publicly listed features, making it impossible to compare functionality. With zero available features, it’s unlikely to meet modern hotel operational needs or provide the versatility that ThinkReservations offers.
The clear advantage goes to ThinkReservations, which provides a broad suite of features aimed at improving efficiency and profitability. Edge: ThinkReservations
ThinkReservations has a customer support rating of 4.82 out of 5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness, knowledgeable staff, and 24/7 availability. Users often mention its “quick responses” and “support that feels like adding another team member,” emphasizing its reliability.
Backing the packers has no publicly available support ratings or recent reviews, casting doubt on its customer service quality. The lack of feedback suggests it may not have the same level of dedicated support or proven responsiveness.
For hoteliers seeking assurance through recent, high-rated support, ThinkReservations clearly leads. Edge: ThinkReservations
ThinkReservations holds a 4.88/5 rating based on 356 reviews with recent activity, and 97% likelihood to recommend. Its highest-rated segments include small boutique hotels and inns, where users frequently commend its operational simplicity and revenue-boosting features.
Backing the packers has no reviews or ratings, so it cannot be rated by users. Without recent feedback, it's impossible to determine user satisfaction or how well it performs across hotel types.
Based on available data, ThinkReservations enjoys a higher reputation among hoteliers, especially in small to medium properties. Edge: ThinkReservations
Backing the packers provides no publicly available pricing information, making it impossible to estimate cost or value. This lack of transparency is a significant drawback for budget-conscious hoteliers.
ThinkReservations charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no additional implementation or per-room fees. Its transparent pricing model helps hotels plan their budgets more confidently.
Given the available data, ThinkReservations offers clear value for the price, while Backing the packers remains an unknown in terms of cost. Edge: ThinkReservations
Not ideal if:
Given the lack of reviews, this platform is best avoided unless you’re prepared to accept high risk.
Not ideal if:
ThinkReservations is well-suited for hotels seeking a proven, feature-rich PMS with strong support.
Edge: ThinkReservations
The core difference is that ThinkReservations is a well-established PMS with extensive recent reviews, high ratings, and proven satisfaction among hoteliers. Backing the packers, with no reviews or recent data, is a risky, unverified option unlikely to meet modern hotel needs.
Choose ThinkReservations if your hotel values a platform with robust features, excellent support, and a track record of satisfied users. Its recent reviews confirm it’s a trusted choice for small to midsize properties looking to streamline operations and boost revenue.
Opt for Backing the packers only if you’re comfortable with significant uncertainty, have very minimal needs, or want to experiment without relying on customer feedback. Given the lack of data, it’s not advisable for most hotels seeking stability and proven performance.
In conclusion, for most hotels, ThinkReservations is the smarter, safer choice backed by recent, positive user feedback and a comprehensive feature set.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Backing the packers |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Backing the packers 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 27 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
尽管许多人已经认为它很优秀,但一些评论表示希望在周末提供额外支持,以便更好地处理紧急询问。
ThinkReservations 通过数字注册、夜间审计以及轻松管理预订和入住流程来帮助简化运营,使员工能够更加专注于与客人的互动。
该系统提供全面的数据和报告功能,使酒店经营者能够就定价、客人满意度和战略规划做出明智的决策。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论强调了定价结构的问题,包括对渠道经理费用的不满以及 ThinkMessenger 等功能的高价格。
强制的两步验证对于一些用户来说是一个令人沮丧的地方,他们觉得它很麻烦并且希望降低安全设置。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Backing the packers 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Backing the packers 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations PMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ThinkReservations PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Backing the packers:否。ThinkReservations PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Backing the packers 的 HT Score 为 0,ThinkReservations 的为 89。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问