The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 120 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Bay Lakes Information Systems 表现出色 .
CiHMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Resorts 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Housekeeping module.
基于 HTR 上 120 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 120 |
在分析了 120 条经验证的评价后,Bay Lakes Information Systems 用户最看重其 ,而 CiHMS 用户则强调 operational efficiency, 高级报告, 任务和资源管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
|
|
+
任务和资源管理
▾
|
|
|
+
基于云的可访问性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级报告
▾
|
|
|
−
用户培训和入职
▾
|
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #45 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #20 31 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 43 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 31 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #15 65 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #10 83 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #15 40 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #17 15 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #65 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #58 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #6 117 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #24 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can dramatically influence your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both Bay Lakes Information Systems and CiHMS aim to streamline your operations, but they differ significantly in maturity, user feedback, and feature depth. While Bay Lakes offers a long-standing legacy with no recent reviews, CiHMS provides a modern, cloud-based platform supported by a wealth of recent user feedback. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s current needs?
Bay Lakes Information Systems has been serving hotels since 1984, theoretically offering a reliable, industry veteran product. However, it has no recent reviews, ratings, or active user feedback, making it impossible to assess current user satisfaction or functionality. CiHMS, on the other hand, boasts 101 reviews with a high overall rating of 81.25 out of 100, and all recent reviews from the last six months are positive, reflecting ongoing support and development.
The key difference is clear: Bay Lakes’ lack of recent feedback means your team cannot confidently rely on its current performance or innovation. CiHMS’s active review base, high scores, and recent feedback provide a more dependable gauge of usability and customer satisfaction. Do you want a proven, well-documented solution or a system backed by recent user experiences?
If your hotel needs a modern, cloud-based PMS with advanced features and active customer support, CiHMS is the clear choice. Its 4.9/5 ease of use, 4.92/5 customer support rating, and 98% likelihood to recommend indicate high satisfaction among users managing a wide range of hotel types, from resorts to city center hotels.
Conversely, if your hotel specifically requires a longstanding industry presence with a focus on traditional property management, and you are comfortable with no recent feedback, Bay Lakes may seem appealing. But without current reviews or recent updates, it’s risky to assume that its functionality remains competitive. Given the available data, CiHMS is the more confident choice for most hotels today.
CiHMS’s user interface earns a near-perfect 4.9 out of 5, with reviews highlighting its intuitive, lean design that simplifies daily tasks. Onboarding is rated 4.84/5, and users praise the system for making staff adoption straightforward and quick, especially with its cloud access and mobile capabilities.
Bay Lakes, by contrast, has a 0/5 ease of use rating from reviews, with no specific user feedback available. The lack of recent reviews and high rating scores suggests it might not be as modern or user-friendly as CiHMS. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS offers 33 features, including a comprehensive suite such as channel management, revenue management, integrated CRS, online booking, guest profiles, automated night audit, multi-currency, and mobile apps—features that dramatically expand operational control.
Bay Lakes provides only basic property management functionalities with no additional modules or integrations reported. Its limited features mean it cannot compete with CiHMS’s extensive capabilities. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s 4.92/5 customer support rating is complemented by recent reviews citing responsive, professional service. Users report timely assistance, especially critical during busy periods, with comments like, “Support team is professional and on-time,” and “Customer service is very helpful and quick to respond.”
Bay Lakes, with a 0/5 rating and no recent reviews, offers no current insights into support quality. The absence of recent feedback suggests it may not be actively maintaining support standards. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS integrates with three verified partners, including SiteMinder, DerbySoft, and Easyway, facilitating multi-channel distribution and revenue management. Its open architecture allows for seamless connectivity with other systems, essential for hotel chains and multi-property groups.
Bay Lakes has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with modern distribution channels or ancillary systems. This restricts scalability and operational flexibility. Edge: CiHMS.
Since Bay Lakes has no recent reviews, there’s no current user feedback or scores to gauge hotel satisfaction. CiHMS’s recent reviews, with an average rating of 81.25, reflect high satisfaction across diverse segments, including resorts and city hotels. Users frequently mention increased efficiency and ease of management.
Given the more recent and abundant feedback, CiHMS clearly holds the higher rating among hoteliers today. Edge: CiHMS.
Bay Lakes does not publicly disclose its pricing or offer trial options, suggesting a possible custom quote or legacy pricing model. CiHMS charges a base fee of $900, with no ongoing monthly fees or implementation costs, but no free trial is available.
The lack of transparent pricing for Bay Lakes complicates comparison, but CiHMS’s known cost structure and clear value proposition make budgeting easier.
The core difference is that CiHMS is actively supported, feature-rich, and highly rated, while Bay Lakes remains unreviewed in recent years, raising questions about its current relevancy. For hotels that need modern tools, real-time data, and reliable support, CiHMS offers a safer, more proven solution.
Choose Bay Lakes only if your hotel values a traditional approach, operates in regions where it’s established, and does not require ongoing innovation. For most hotels today, especially those seeking adaptability and confidence backed by recent user feedback, CiHMS is the clearly superior option.
In summary, the decision hinges on your hotel’s need for modern features, regional support, and active customer feedback. Given the data, CiHMS stands out as the more dependable, feature-rich, and user-approved choice.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Bay Lakes Information Systems 和 CiHMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 21 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Bay Lakes Information Systems 和 CiHMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bay Lakes Information Systems 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 CiHMS 提供 3 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bay Lakes Information Systems:否。CiHMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bay Lakes Information Systems 的 HT Score 为 0,CiHMS 的为 81。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问