The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 29 条评价 | #7 5 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 42 条评价 | #16 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #13 0 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #12 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 28 条评价 | #10 3 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 32 条评价 | #11 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 19 条评价 | #13 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #5 4 条评价 | #10 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #12 0 条评价 | #13 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 76 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #8 0 条评价 | #2 5 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #11 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Blastness CRS and Djubo requires clear understanding of how each addresses your hotel’s needs. Both products aim to streamline reservation management and boost revenue, but their capabilities, market presence, and user feedback diverge significantly. Blastness offers a tailored solution predominantly for independent hotels with a focus on revenue management, while Djubo presents an all-in-one platform suited for a range of hotel types but with fewer recent reviews.
Your choice hinges on whether you prioritize more recent user feedback and a broader integration network or specialized revenue tools and an intuitive user interface. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s operational goals?
Blastness and Djubo serve the fundamental purpose of reservation management but differ vastly in their approach and market focus. Blastness excels in revenue management and digital marketing tools for independent hotels, with a high HTR Score of 100 based on 72 reviews and recent positive feedback. Djubo, despite having a higher overall user rating of 5/5 from 19 reviews, has a lower HTR Score of 0, indicating less recent and less comprehensive feedback.
Blastness is praised for its user-friendly revenue systems and marketing capabilities, whereas Djubo is lauded for its integrated platform and multi-module approach. The real question is: do you need a dedicated revenue management system, or a comprehensive management suite?
If your hotel needs advanced revenue management and direct booking optimization, Blastness provides a specialized CRS designed for independent hotels. Its core strengths include real-time rate control, marketing tools, and detailed reporting — ideal for boutique and city-center hotels focused on direct bookings. Conversely, Djubo suits hotels seeking an all-in-one platform that combines PMS, channel management, POS, and revenue functions, especially if managing multiple properties or requiring a unified dashboard.
For small, independent properties aiming to maximize revenue and control, Blastness’s dedicated tools are more suitable. If your hotel operates across multiple locations with diverse operational needs, Djubo’s modular, integrated system offers flexibility.
Blastness scores a 4.89/5 for ease of use based on ongoing customer feedback, with reviewers frequently citing its intuitive revenue management and booking engine. Its onboarding process is rated at 4.94/5, reflecting a straightforward setup and strong support, though some users suggest interface improvements for navigation.
Djubo also earns high marks, with a 4.74/5 ease-of-use score. Users appreciate its clean interface and the professionalism of the training, but note that POS inaccuracies and feature gaps may hinder daily operations. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness offers 14 shared features and 4 unique ones, including geotargeted pricing, content management, TMC management, and a reporting dashboard. These are tailored for revenue optimization and marketing, giving it an edge for independent hotels focused on direct booking growth.
Djubo provides 16 unique features like a comprehensive channel manager, multi-currency, PMS, POS, group booking engine, and guest feedback management. Its extensive module set supports larger operations with diverse needs. Edge: Djubo.
Blastness’s support scores a 4.9/5, with reviews highlighting professional, responsive assistance and ongoing support that keeps the system running smoothly. Users mention immediate responses to issues and helpful training, making support a key strength.
Djubo’s support scores 4.61/5, with feedback pointing to friendly service but some inconsistency in issue resolution, especially around feature gaps and reporting. Recent reviews suggest support is generally good but less responsive compared to Blastness. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness boasts 15 verified integrations, including Oracle Hospitality, Hotelcube, and Vertical Booking, covering a broad range of distribution and management tools. Djubo has only 3 verified partners, with shared integrations being minimal, mainly TripAdvisor.
If extensive third-party integrations are critical for your hotel, Blastness’s larger network offers more flexibility and options. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness’s reviews are more recent, with 15 new reviews in the last 6 months, contributing to its high rating and a 99% likelihood to recommend. Hotel segments like luxury and city-center hotels frequently praise its revenue tools and support.
Djubo’s reviews, while positive, are older and fewer, with a 97% recommendation rate. Boutique hotels and resorts in its user base value its all-in-one approach but report less recent system updates.
Given the recency and volume of feedback, Blastness’s ratings are more representative of current performance. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness charges a flat rate of $600 per month without trial options. Its straightforward pricing emphasizes transparency and predictability for independent hotels investing in revenue-focused tools.
Djubo does not publicly disclose pricing, but based on industry context, it typically offers tiered packages without a fixed monthly fee, focusing on modular solutions. Exact costs vary depending on modules selected, which can make direct comparison difficult.
Hotels that benefit most from Blastness:
Not ideal if:
Hotels suited for Djubo:
Not ideal if:
Blastness is a niche CRS tailored for independent hotels seeking to maximize revenue through digital marketing and targeted management tools. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive integration network make it a strong choice for properties focusing on direct bookings and revenue control.
Djubo offers a wide-ranging, modular platform suitable for multi-property operations that need integrated PMS, channel management, POS, and other management functions. Its comprehensive features are ideal if your hotel requires an all-in-one solution, despite fewer recent reviews and a narrower integration network.
If your primary goal is revenue optimization and direct bookings, Blastness’s recent performance and high user approval make it the better choice. For larger, multi-faceted operations needing broad management tools, Djubo’s integrated platform is more appropriate.
Final call: For most independent hotels prioritizing revenue and recent support, Blastness edges out Djubo. However, if your hotel needs a broad, multi-module platform, Djubo remains a viable option.
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论称赞 Blastness 提供的专业和及时的帮助,强调了持续培训和对市场变化做出快速反应的重要性。
用户喜欢可以轻松访问全面的数据,以及灵活调整价格和设置,这有利于战略规划和调整。
用户报告称,Blastness 与现有系统集成良好,从而形成一个连贯的工作流程,没有技术故障或中断,从而提高了日常运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然总体上广受好评,但一些用户指出,Blastness 界面的某些部分可以更加直观,这将增强导航和用户体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Blastness CRS 和 Djubo (CRS) 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Blastness CRS 提供 15 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Djubo (CRS) 提供 3 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Blastness CRS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Blastness CRS:否。Djubo (CRS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Blastness 的 HT Score 为 100,DJUBO 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问