The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Huazhu |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 29 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 42 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #13 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Huazhu |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 28 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 32 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 19 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #5 4 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Huazhu |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #12 0 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 76 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #8 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Blastness CRS by Blastness and Hub+ by Huazhu hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and strategic goals. Both aim to streamline reservations, but Blastness is a dedicated hotel reservation platform with comprehensive revenue management and distribution features, while Hub+ appears more tailored to property management and tenant relations in the broader real estate or rental sectors. For hoteliers seeking a specialized reservation and revenue solution, Blastness is the clear choice.
While Hub+ offers robust property management tools, its focus isn’t solely on hotel reservations or distribution, making it less suited for hotels prioritizing direct bookings and channel management. Are you looking for a platform that specializes in optimizing hotel revenue and distribution? Then the decision becomes clearer.
Blastness offers a full suite tailored to hotels, featuring real-time channel management, dynamic pricing, and booking engines that directly increase direct bookings and revenue. Hub+, on the other hand, centers on property management and tenant tracking, making it less focused on hotel-specific reservation needs.
Blastness’s 72 recent reviews with a 4.9/5 customer support score and a 9.94/10 NPS demonstrate a highly engaged user base and strong recent performance. In contrast, Hub+ lacks recent review data and doesn’t have a dedicated hotel user base, indicating limited hotel-specific adoption or feedback. Are you primarily interested in a platform that’s proven in hotel reservation management? Blastness is the clear leader here.
If your hotel needs a reservation platform that manages rates across channels, offers a powerful booking engine, and provides detailed revenue insights, go with Blastness. Its focus on independent hotels in various segments, especially luxury, boutique, and city-center hotels, makes it ideal for properties seeking to boost direct bookings and revenue.
However, if your hotel or property is more focused on property management, tenant relations, or rental operations rather than reservations, Hub+ may be more suitable. Its emphasis on automating routine tasks and managing tenant data points to a different use case, not directly aligned with hotel reservation optimization. For your hotel, Blastness’s proven track record and feature depth make it the more appropriate choice.
Blastness’s user interface scores 4.89/5, reflecting an intuitive experience for hoteliers, complemented by onboarding ratings of 4.94/5. Users praise its ease of managing bookings, channel synchronization, and revenue tools, with many citing quick setup and straightforward workflows. Recent reviews emphasize that staff adopt Blastness rapidly, and the platform’s support team is highly responsive.
In contrast, there are no available usability data or recent reviews for Hub+. Its broader property management focus suggests a potentially steeper learning curve for reservation-specific tasks. Given the clear positive feedback and high ratings from Blastness’s user base, edge: Blastness.
Blastness offers 18 features exclusive to hotel reservation and revenue management, including RMS and PMS connectivity, metasearch integration, geotargeted pricing, dynamic pricing, and a mobile app. Its features support weekly/monthly rates, booking rules, cancellation policies, TMC management, and content management, all tailored for hotel operations.
Hub+ appears to lack dedicated hotel reservation features and does not list specific functionalities comparable to Blastness. Its core strengths seem centered on property management rather than reservation or revenue optimization. Edge: Blastness for feature richness and hotel-specific capabilities.
Blastness is rated 4.9/5 for customer support, with recent reviews highlighting professional, quick, and personalized assistance. Users mention ongoing training, immediate responses, and proactive market alerts, which reinforce confidence in their support team.
Hub+ offers no recent reviews or detailed support ratings, making it difficult to assess its service quality. Given Blastness’s high support scores and recent positive feedback, edge: Blastness.
Blastness boasts 15 verified integrations, including prominent partners like Duetto, Oracle Hospitality, and channel managers such as Vertical Booking. These integrations enable smooth connectivity across revenue, distribution, and hotel management systems.
Hub+ has only one listed integration, with no further details. For hotels relying on a diverse tech stack, Blastness provides a significantly broader ecosystem of compatible solutions. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness, with 72 recent reviews, enjoys a near-perfect user rating of 4.9/5, with a 99% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments—particularly luxury, boutique, and city-center properties—praise its ease of use, support, and revenue impact.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for Hub+, limiting insights into user sentiment. Based on available data, Blastness’s hotel user satisfaction is clearly superior. Edge: Blastness.
Blastness charges a flat fee of $600 per month, with no implementation, setup, or trial fees. Its transparent pricing offers a predictable expense, aligning with value for money given its extensive features.
Hub+ does not provide public pricing details, making it difficult to compare costs directly. However, without clear pricing transparency or recent reviews, Blastness’s known cost structure and proven value give it an edge in affordability and clarity.
Hotels that should consider Blastness include:
Not ideal if:
Hotels or property managers that may benefit from Hub+ include:
Not ideal if:
Blastness offers an extensive, hotel-focused reservation system with features that support revenue growth, distribution, and guest conversion. Its strong recent reviews and high customer support ratings establish it as an industry leader for hotel reservation software.
Hub+ appears geared toward property management and tenant relations, suitable for rental operations but lacking dedicated hotel reservation features or recent hotel feedback. Its broader property management scope makes it less suitable for hotels seeking reservation optimization.
If your hotel prioritizes direct bookings, channel management, and revenue tools, Blastness is the clear choice. For property management or rental-focused operations, Hub+ might fit better, but it’s not the best fit for hotel reservation needs.
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论称赞 Blastness 提供的专业和及时的帮助,强调了持续培训和对市场变化做出快速反应的重要性。
用户喜欢可以轻松访问全面的数据,以及灵活调整价格和设置,这有利于战略规划和调整。
用户报告称,Blastness 与现有系统集成良好,从而形成一个连贯的工作流程,没有技术故障或中断,从而提高了日常运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然总体上广受好评,但一些用户指出,Blastness 界面的某些部分可以更加直观,这将增强导航和用户体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Blastness CRS 和 Hub+ 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Blastness CRS 提供 15 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hub+ 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Blastness CRS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Blastness CRS:否。Hub+:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Blastness 的 HT Score 为 100,Huazhu 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问