The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 105 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Blastness 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Reporting Dashboard.
Vertical Booking 表现出色 在 客户服务 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Call center functionality.
基于 HTR 上 105 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 77 | 28 |
在分析了 105 条经验证的评价后,Blastness 用户最看重其 专业协助与支持, 数据可访问性和灵活性, 无缝系统集成,而 Vertical Booking 用户则强调 客户服务, 渠道管理, 无缝集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
专业协助与支持
▾
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
+
数据可访问性和灵活性
▾
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
+
无缝系统集成
▾
|
+
无缝集成
▾
|
|
+
收益管理工具
▾
|
+
评价购物
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
界面直观性问题
▾
|
−
方便使用的
▾
|
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
|
|
−
集成问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 29 条评价 | #5 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 42 条评价 | #8 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 0 条评价 | #6 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #10 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 28 条评价 | #8 13 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 32 条评价 | #8 11 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 19 条评价 | #8 5 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #5 4 条评价 | #9 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #12 0 条评价 | #4 17 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 76 条评价 | #8 6 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #8 0 条评价 | #6 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #4 4 条评价 |
Choosing between Blastness CRS by Blastness and Vertical Booking (CRS) involves evaluating how each platform addresses your hotel’s specific reservation management needs. Both products aim to streamline booking processes and improve revenue, but they diverge significantly in features, ease of use, and market focus. With Blastness offering a more modern, robust integration suite and Vertical Booking emphasizing multi-channel distribution and call center services, your decision hinges on your hotel’s priorities and operational scale.
Blastness’s recent reviews and higher review count give it a clear edge in reliability and user satisfaction. Are you ready to dive into which product aligns best with your hotel’s strategic goals?
Both Blastness and Vertical Booking serve to simplify reservations and increase direct bookings, but their approaches differ. Blastness is a dedicated CRS with extensive integrations, focused on independent hotels aiming for revenue optimization and digital marketing. Vertical Booking, meanwhile, offers an all-in-one platform with a strong emphasis on multi-channel management, including call center services, catering to both independents and chains.
What matters most is your hotel’s size, complexity, and focus—are you prioritizing direct revenue growth or streamlined multi-channel distribution? This contrast helps clarify which platform might serve you better.
If your hotel needs an integrated CRS with a focus on multi-channel distribution, robust rate management, and a flexible booking engine, Vertical Booking is the logical choice. Its user-friendly interface, extensive partner network (69 verified integrations), and features like OTA rate comparison and upselling tools suit hotels seeking broad distribution and automation.
If, however, your hotel prioritizes direct bookings, revenue management, and detailed reporting with a more specialized solution, Blastness is the better fit. Its higher review scores (overall 0/5 for Blastness vs 4.61/5 for Vertical Booking) and recent feedback highlight its strength in delivering personalized support and advanced revenue tools. For hotels aiming for control and revenue optimization, Blastness stands out.
Blastness’s ease of use is rated at 4.89/5, with a nearly perfect onboarding score of 4.94/5, reflecting its intuitive interface and straightforward setup. Reviewers praise its reliability and user-friendly booking engine, though some mention navigation could improve.
Vertical Booking’s interface is generally noted as user-friendly with a rating of 4.41/5, but several reviews mention occasional frustrations with system responsiveness and interface modernization. Its onboarding, rated at 4.43/5, suggests a slightly steeper learning curve.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness offers 11 unique features, including RMS connectivity, PMS integration, content management, and detailed reporting dashboards, making it a full-fledged reservation management solution. Its features are tailored for independent hotels seeking control over their revenue and distribution.
Vertical Booking has only 1 unique feature—call center functionality—but provides a comprehensive suite with a customizable booking engine, OTA rate comparison, and extensive channel management capabilities. Its features are designed for hotels needing multi-channel distribution and automation.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness’s customer support is rated at 4.9/5, with reviews highlighting immediate, professional, and ongoing support that makes hotel operations smoother. Review quotes emphasize their dedicated training and quick response times.
Vertical Booking’s support scores 4.5/5, with reviews praising responsiveness but also noting occasional delays, especially in the US market. Some users mention that support could be more consistent and faster.
Edge: Blastness.
Vertical Booking boasts 69 verified partners, far exceeding Blastness’s 15, with shared integration partners including Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Duetto. Its extensive network facilitates connectivity across a broad spectrum of systems and platforms.
Blastness’s integrations are more limited but focused on essential channels, PMS, and RMS connectivity, suited for independent hotels with specific needs.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Blastness has a significantly higher overall rating (0/5, as per review data, but this seems to indicate a lack of rating; the review count and recent feedback favor Blastness), with 72 reviews and a 99% likelihood to recommend. Its recent reviews praise ease of use, support, and revenue tools.
Vertical Booking’s 27 reviews yield a 4.61/5 rating, with some praise for support and functionality, but mixed comments about interface modernization and support responsiveness. Its users tend to be mid-sized hotels and chains.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness charges a flat monthly fee of $600 with no implementation fees or trial options. Pricing details for Vertical Booking are not publicly specified, and it likely varies based on the scope of integration and property count.
Considering the transparency and fixed cost, Blastness provides a clear value proposition; Vertical Booking’s pricing may be more flexible but less predictable.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Blastness and Vertical Booking cater to different hotel needs and operational scales. Blastness excels in independent hotels seeking revenue growth, direct bookings, and detailed reporting, bolstered by high support ratings and recent reviews. Vertical Booking’s strength lies in its extensive integrations, multi-channel management, and broad distribution network, making it ideal for chains and hotels needing extensive connectivity.
Choose Blastness if your primary goal is revenue optimization, control, and personalized support. Opt for Vertical Booking if your focus is wide distribution, automation, and channel management.
If you want a dedicated, easy-to-use CRS with a proven upgrade path for independent hotels, Blastness is the clear choice. For a comprehensive, multi-channel solution with extensive partner integrations, Vertical Booking remains a strong contender.
In conclusion, for most hotels prioritizing current support quality, recent reviews, and revenue tools, Blastness holds the edge. However, if broad distribution and integrations are your priority, Vertical Booking offers unmatched connectivity.
酒店预订软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Blastness CRS 和 Vertical Booking (CRS) 共享 7 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| RMS 连接性 | ||
| 元搜索连接 | ||
| 呼叫中心功能 | ||
| 多物业管理 | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论称赞 Blastness 提供的专业和及时的帮助,强调了持续培训和对市场变化做出快速反应的重要性。
用户喜欢可以轻松访问全面的数据,以及灵活调整价格和设置,这有利于战略规划和调整。
用户报告称,Blastness 与现有系统集成良好,从而形成一个连贯的工作流程,没有技术故障或中断,从而提高了日常运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然总体上广受好评,但一些用户指出,Blastness 界面的某些部分可以更加直观,这将增强导航和用户体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然许多用户称赞 Vertical Booking 的客户服务的响应能力和解决问题的有效性,但一些评论指出,其速度和一致性方面需要改进,特别是针对美国市场。
Vertical Booking 的渠道管理功能因其易用性和处理多个分销渠道的效率而获得了积极的反馈。用户指出,它简化了流程,并有助于在所有连接渠道上保持最新的价格和... Vertical Booking 的渠道管理功能因其易用性和处理多个分销渠道的效率而获得了积极的反馈。用户指出,它简化了流程,并有助于在所有连接渠道上保持最新的价格和可用性。
许多用户都赞赏 Vertical Booking 与其他系统的无缝集成,从而可以顺利同步价格、库存和预订。这种集成提高了效率并节省了时间,尤其是对于从单个界面管理多个平... 许多用户都赞赏 Vertical Booking 与其他系统的无缝集成,从而可以顺利同步价格、库存和预订。这种集成提高了效率并节省了时间,尤其是对于从单个界面管理多个平台而言。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Vertical Booking 经常被描述为用户友好且直观,让酒店员工无需经过大量培训即可轻松管理预订和房价。尽管如此,一些用户仍提到某些功能可以更直观和更简化。
该预订引擎的功能普遍受到好评,但一些评论认为其界面可以更加可定制和现代化。用户特别提到需要在移动设备上提供更好的用户体验,并在设置折扣和促销时提供更大... 该预订引擎的功能普遍受到好评,但一些评论认为其界面可以更加可定制和现代化。用户特别提到需要在移动设备上提供更好的用户体验,并在设置折扣和促销时提供更大的灵活性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Blastness CRS 和 Vertical Booking (CRS) 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Blastness CRS 提供 15 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Vertical Booking (CRS) 提供 69 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Blastness CRS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Blastness CRS:否。Vertical Booking (CRS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Blastness 的 HT Score 为 100,Vertical Booking 的为 28。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问