The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 210 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Bnovo (Биново) 表现出色 .
eviivo 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Vacation Rentals & Villas 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Ancillary revenue tracking and Mobile App.
基于 HTR 上 210 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $700/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 2 | 208 |
在分析了 210 条经验证的评价后,Bnovo (Биново) 用户最看重其 ,而 eviivo 用户则强调 响应式客户支持, 入职专业知识, 技术效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
响应式客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
入职专业知识
▾
|
|
|
+
技术效率
▾
|
|
|
+
预订和预约效率
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
改进建议
▾
|
|
|
−
定制和功能开发
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #55 1 条评价 | #15 54 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #23 23 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #51 0 条评价 | #20 8 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #18 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #70 1 条评价 | #19 41 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #70 0 条评价 | #16 38 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #19 21 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #10 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #15 39 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #39 2 条评价 | #6 142 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #33 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #29 1 条评价 |
Your team is weighing two property management systems: Bnovo PMS by Bnovo and eviivo Suite™ by eviivo. Both aim to streamline hotel operations, but they approach this goal quite differently. Bnovo is a less mature option with only two recent reviews and a modest overall score, while eviivo boasts over 191 reviews, recent user feedback, and a significantly higher rating. Given this, which platform truly matches your needs?
Both Bnovo and eviivo are cloud-based PMS solutions designed to automate operations and optimize bookings. However, Bnovo has a very limited review base—only 2 reviews in total, with no recent feedback—raising questions about its reliability and user satisfaction. eviivo, contrastingly, has 191 reviews, with 20 in the last six months alone, giving you fresher insights into its performance. Does a larger, more recent review pool influence your confidence?
While Bnovo offers integrations with some sales channels and basic capacity management, its user feedback highlights stability issues, server crashes, and poor support. eviivo, meanwhile, provides extensive integrations with over 32 partners, including OTAs like Expedia and Booking.com, and features such as real-time reporting and automated night audits. Are these features critical for your hotel’s growth and daily management?
In summary, Bnovo attempts to meet hotel needs but suffers from limited feedback and stability concerns. eviivo’s larger, more recent review base signals ongoing product development and better user satisfaction. Which system aligns more with your operational expectations and future growth?
If your hotel requires a simple, budget-friendly solution for basic bookings and channel management—particularly if you operate in Europe, Russia, or the Middle East—Bnovo could be considered. It’s used mainly by motels and villas, with a focus on cost efficiency and local market connectivity.
However, if your hotel needs a comprehensive, multi-channel PMS with a broad feature set, robust integrations, and proven scalability—especially if you manage multiple properties or diverse accommodation types—eviivo is the superior choice. Its client base includes B&Bs, vacation rentals, boutique hotels, and large portfolios, with a strong global presence.
Ultimately, for hotels prioritizing reliability, support, and extensive features, eviivo’s larger review volume and recent feedback make it the more trustworthy option. Do your operational priorities favor a straightforward system or a full-featured platform with proven scalability?
Based on available ratings, Bnovo scores 3 out of 5 for ease of use, with mixed feedback about its interface and onboarding. Its limited reviews do not provide much detail on staff adoption or user experience, but some users mention it’s understandable and implementable independently.
In contrast, eviivo scores 4.43 out of 5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and strong support. Users highlight how mobile management and automation tools make daily tasks easier, even for less tech-savvy staff. Edge: eviivo.
Bnovo offers basic functionalities like booking management and sales channel connectors, but it lacks advanced features found elsewhere. It has zero unique features beyond its core offering, limiting customization and automation options.
eviivo, on the other hand, provides 32 exclusive features, including guest messaging, online check-in/out, digital registration, automated reminders, and integrated payment terminals. Its feature count reflects a more comprehensive approach to property management. Edge: eviivo.
Support ratings reveal a stark contrast. Bnovo’s customer support scores just 1.25/5, with reviews criticizing slow responses, poor technical fixes, and support staff working in accordance with ITIL rather than customer needs.
eviivo’s customer support scores an impressive 4.42/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and dedicated onboarding. Clients like Hotel Garni Seestern and Hotel zum Landsberger Hof praise eviivo’s responsiveness and guidance, making daily management smoother. Edge: eviivo.
Bnovo has only 2 verified integrations—limited and mainly regional—while eviivo boasts 32 verified partners, including major OTAs and technology providers like Tripadvisor, Experience Hotel, and D-Edge. eviivo’s broader integration network enables more distribution flexibility and automation.
Shared integrations are nonexistent, emphasizing eviivo’s superior connectivity. For hotels seeking extensive distribution options, eviivo clearly dominates. Edge: eviivo.
With 191 reviews, eviivo’s average rating of 0.93/5 indicates widespread dissatisfaction, primarily due to support and stability issues. Despite this, recent reviews show improvements and positive feedback on its features and support.
Bnovo, with only 2 reviews and a 2.25/5 rating, reflects limited user experience and ongoing product concerns, particularly stability and mobile usability. Given the larger, more recent user base, eviivo’s higher review count and recent positive feedback give it the edge.
Bnovo does not publicly list its pricing, which suggests a customized quote based on hotel size and needs. eviivo costs $700 per month, with no free tier or trial, positioning it as a premium solution.
Considering value for money, Bnovo’s lack of transparent pricing and limited features may result in hidden costs. eviivo’s transparent pricing aligns with its extensive features and support, offering a clearer investment picture.
The core difference lies in maturity and feature breadth. Bnovo is a basic, regional PMS with limited reviews and features, suited for small, specific markets but with stability concerns.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich platform with recent positive feedback, eviivo is the clear choice. Its extensive integrations, proven scalability, and robust support justify its higher price.
For hotels that prioritize stability, automation, and a proven track record, eviivo offers a more dependable investment. Conversely, if cost and simplicity matter most and your needs are minimal, Bnovo might suffice—though it’s less certain in performance.
In conclusion, given the recent reviews, larger user base, and higher satisfaction scores, eviivo Suite™ is recommended for most hotels aiming for operational efficiency and growth.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $700/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Bnovo PMS 和 eviivo Suite™ PMS 共享 19 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 20 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Bnovo PMS 和 eviivo Suite™ PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bnovo PMS 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 3.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bnovo PMS:否。eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bnovo (Биново) 的 HT Score 为 0,eviivo 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问