The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #26 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #46 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #32 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #31 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #31 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #44 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #43 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #32 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #25 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #20 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #11 2 条评价 |
You're evaluating two property management systems—Bokun by Bokun and Counter—both designed to streamline operations and improve guest management. Bokun primarily targets tour operators and activity providers, while Counter is built specifically for hostels. Both aim to simplify daily tasks but diverge significantly in their scope, user base, and feature sets.
Bokun offers a comprehensive booking platform with a focus on tours, activities, and experience providers, whereas Counter provides an all-in-one PMS tailored for hostel operations. Given your needs, which platform aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?
Bokun and Counter address different core hotel needs. Bokun excels in managing experience bookings, inventory, and real-time availability synchronization across channels—ideal if your hotel offers tours, activities, or packages as part of your guest experience. Counter, on the other hand, focuses on streamlining front desk operations, reservations, and housekeeping specifically for hostels.
Bokun, with zero recent reviews and a low overall rating of 0/5, lacks the recent user feedback necessary to assess its current viability for hotels. Conversely, Counter boasts 54 reviews over the last six months, with an overall rating of 4.73/5 and a strong customer support score of 4.96/5, making it a more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking active, recent feedback. Do you need a system focused on experience management or daily hostel operations?
If your hotel offers activities, tours, or experience packages, Bokun is worth considering for its inventory management and online distribution channels. Its platform is designed to handle complex arrangements like multi-day bookings or custom pricing for experiences.
However, if you operate a hostel or budget hotel needing a straightforward, user-friendly PMS with automation and guest management features, Counter is the clear winner. Its dedicated features for hostels, like automated night audits, POS integration, and group bookings, cater directly to your operational needs. For small to midsize hostels, Counter’s proven track record makes it the safer, more supportive choice.
Counter scores significantly higher in ease of use, with a 4.6/5 rating and multiple reviews praising its intuitive interface and quick staff onboarding. Users note that staff can learn and adapt to Counter swiftly, even with minimal training, citing its mobile-friendly design and clear calendar views.
Bokun, with a 0/5 rating and no recent reviews, shows no recent evidence of user satisfaction or usability, making it difficult to gauge its current platform experience. Given the active user feedback, Counter clearly has the edge.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers a suite of 19 features exclusive to its platform, including a channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, housekeeping module, guest CRM, multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and automated night audits. These features directly enhance operational efficiency and guest management for hostels.
Bokun, with no unique features listed apart from its core booking system, lacks the extensive functionality Counter provides. Its platform appears more limited in scope, making Counter’s broader feature set a decisive advantage for hotel operators seeking comprehensive tools.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support ratings are exceptional, with a 4.96/5 score based on recent reviews that highlight responsive, helpful customer service—especially from staff like Evelyn and Max. Guests appreciate their quick response times and proactive problem-solving.
In contrast, Bokun offers no recent reviews or rating data, making it difficult to assess its current support quality. The absence of recent feedback suggests that Counter’s customer support is superior and more dependable.
Edge: Counter.
Counter has verified integrations with seven partners, including Stripe, Goki, Cloudbeds, and SiteMinder. These connections enable seamless payment processing, channel management, and access control, vital for hostel operations.
Bokun currently reports zero verified partners, limiting its integration capabilities. For streamlining your tech stack and expanding distribution channels, Counter’s broader integration network offers a clear advantage.
Edge: Counter.
With 54 recent reviews, Counter enjoys a high overall rating of 4.73/5, particularly praised by hostel operators and small hotel managers. Users commend its ease of use, automation, and support responsiveness, with some describing it as “the best PMS for hostels.”
Bokun’s lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating make it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Based on the available data, Counter’s ratings clearly demonstrate its appeal to hoteliers and hostel owners alike.
Edge: Counter.
Both platforms do not publicly disclose specific pricing details or subscription models. They are offered without trial periods or implementation fees, but exact costs likely vary based on your property size and feature needs.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your decision may hinge on evaluating the value and features provided, especially since Counter’s extensive feature set can offer significant ROI for hostel operations.
Bokun is best suited for experience-focused businesses rather than traditional hotels.
Counter’s features are designed to optimize hostel and budget hotel workflows, making it the ideal choice for these segments.
The primary difference lies in their core focus: Bokun is tailored for experience and activity providers, while Counter is built for hostel operations. Counter’s active reviews, high ratings, and broad feature set make it the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking a user-friendly, full-featured PMS.
Choose Bokun if your hotel heavily relies on experience sales and distribution channels, but for daily operations, automation, and support, Counter stands out as the superior option.
If your property demands a versatile, easy-to-use platform with proven support, Counter is the clear winner. Its recent reviews and extensive feature list demonstrate it’s the more mature, hotel-centric solution ready to meet your operational needs now.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Bokun 和 Counter 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bokun 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Counter 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bokun:否。Counter:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bokun 的 HT Score 为 0,Counter 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问