项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 738 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Bookassist 表现出色 在 客户支持效率 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的住宿设施 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Urgency messaging.
Exely 表现出色 在 支持响应速度和账户指导 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Form autofill and PayU.
基于 HTR 上 738 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 起价 $200/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 444 | 294 |
在分析了 738 条经验证的评价后,Bookassist 用户最看重其 客户支持效率, 用户友好的预订引擎, 报告和分析,而 Exely 用户则强调 支持响应速度和账户指导, 预订引擎的易用性和客人转化流程, 直接预订与收入增长。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持效率
▾
|
+
支持响应速度和账户指导
▾
|
|
+
用户友好的预订引擎
▾
|
+
预订引擎的易用性和客人转化流程
▾
|
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
+
直接预订与收入增长
▾
|
|
+
直接预订增加
▾
|
+
渠道管理与OTA同步
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
后端直观性
▾
|
−
报告与分析深度
▾
|
|
−
包管理的灵活性
▾
|
−
设计、品牌和定制限制
▾
|
|
−
多平台和多语言支持
▾
|
−
与PMS、支付网关和第三方的集成与连接
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 140 条评价 | #15 34 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 215 条评价 | #11 64 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 53 条评价 | #22 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | #8 6 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 195 条评价 | #15 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #7 146 条评价 | #15 28 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 100 条评价 | #16 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #3 60 条评价 | #16 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | #24 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 400 条评价 | #25 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #23 2 条评价 | #4 79 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | #2 17 条评价 |
Choosing a booking engine for your hotel involves balancing features, ease of use, support, and cost. Bookassist and Exely aim to meet these needs but serve different hotel profiles and operational priorities. Bookassist has a long-standing reputation with extensive reviews and a broader global presence, especially in Europe. Exely, meanwhile, is newer but has gained notable traction with recent reviews emphasizing its user-friendliness and rapid deployment. Which of these solutions aligns best with your hotel’s specific needs?
Both Bookassist and Exely offer comprehensive booking solutions, but they differ in market maturity and feature depth. Bookassist, founded in 1999, is a well-established player with over 324 reviews, most recent within the last six months, giving it a data-rich, reliable perspective. Exely, founded in 2023, has 144 reviews with 63 in the last six months, offering more recent feedback but less historical data.
Bookassist’s strengths lie in its extensive feature set, integrations, and proven track record across multiple regions, especially in Europe. Exely, by contrast, emphasizes ease of use, rapid setup, and a user-friendly interface, making it attractive for smaller or newer hotel operators. Both products aim to maximize direct bookings, but their approaches and maturity levels diverge.
Are you leaning toward a mature solution with proven results or a newer platform focused on simplicity and quick implementation?
If your hotel needs a robust, feature-rich booking engine aimed at increasing direct bookings and integrating with extensive marketing tools, go with Bookassist. It’s ideal for independent hotels, boutique properties, or small chains seeking comprehensive analytics, marketing, and multi-channel support. Its high review count and recent positive feedback reinforce its reliability for established properties.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, quick deployment, and a straightforward interface, Exely is the better choice. It suits independent hotels and smaller chains wanting to enhance their online presence without a complicated setup. Its focus on user-friendliness and rapid performance makes it ideal for hoteliers seeking immediate results and simple management.
In summary, choose Bookassist if your hotel values depth, customization, and proven global presence. Opt for Exely if you want an intuitive, quick-to-go-live solution that emphasizes simplicity and recent positive reviews.
Bookassist’s user rating of 4.63/5 reflects a generally positive experience but indicates some room for improvement in backend usability. Multiple reviews mention the interface being somewhat complex initially, with users noting that managing packages or features can be cumbersome. Its onboarding rating of 4.73/5 shows hoteliers find the setup manageable but not effortless.
Exely, rated at 4.91/5 for ease of use, impresses users with its intuitive design, simple dashboard, and straightforward booking management. Recent reviews highlight its fast setup and minimal learning curve, making it more accessible for hotels that lack extensive technical resources.
Edge: Exely.
Bookassist offers a rich feature set with 27 shared functionalities plus 13 unique features, including gift vouchers, wedding modules, social media integration, and advanced analytics. Its features support complex rate adjustments, promotional campaigns, and multi-language options, providing a versatile platform for diverse hotel needs.
Exely, with only 2 unique features (Form autofill and PayU), focuses on core booking functionalities. Its strength lies in simplicity and reliability, with a streamlined interface and essential tools that boost direct bookings without overwhelming users.
Edge: Bookassist.
Bookassist’s support rating of 4.85/5 demonstrates high satisfaction levels, with reviews praising their quick, professional responses and dedicated assistance. Users mention their support team as knowledgeable and proactive, making onboarding and troubleshooting smoother.
Exely slightly edges out with a 4.96/5 rating, with reviews emphasizing the team’s friendliness, promptness, and willingness to explain technical issues clearly. Recent feedback underscores their responsiveness, especially during the setup phase.
Edge: Exely.
Bookassist’s 74 verified partners, including major systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and IDeaS, showcase its broad integration ecosystem. This extensive network enables seamless connection with PMS, channel managers, marketing tools, and payment systems, offering much flexibility for hotels with complex tech stacks.
Exely, with only 8 verified partners and a handful of integrations (notably with Hotellab and Booking.com), provides more limited connectivity. Its focus is on core booking and channel management rather than extensive third-party integrations.
Edge: Bookassist.
Bookassist’s overall rating of 4.89/5 from 324 reviews reflects a well-regarded platform, especially among boutique and city-center hotels in Europe. The recent reviews, though limited, remain positive, reinforcing its consistent performance.
Exely’s recent reviews and a 4.96/5 support rating indicate strong satisfaction, particularly among newer users who appreciate its user-friendly approach. However, the smaller review base suggests less long-term confidence in the platform’s overall performance.
Edge: Bookassist.
Bookassist’s pricing model is not publicly detailed, but it generally involves custom quotes based on hotel size and needs, often reflecting its premium positioning. No freemium or trial options are publicly available, suggesting a higher investment threshold.
Exely charges a flat $200 monthly fee, with no free tier or trial, making it transparent but potentially less scalable for larger properties. Its lower entry cost and straightforward pricing appeal to smaller hotels seeking predictable expenses.
In summary, Bookassist may have higher, customized costs, while Exely provides a clear, fixed fee structure.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers straightforward solutions with minimal setup or operates on a tight budget.
Not ideal if your hotel requires deep customization, extensive third-party integrations, or advanced marketing features.
Bookassist and Exely serve different hotel segments and operational needs. Bookassist’s core strength lies in its extensive feature set, integrations, and proven track record across multiple regions, making it ideal for established properties seeking depth and flexibility. Its reviews and market presence reinforce its position as a mature, trusted solution.
Exely, on the other hand, appeals to independent and smaller hotels that need a simple, fast-to-implement platform. Its recent reviews highlight ease of use, responsive support, and a transparent pricing structure—best suited for hotels prioritizing quick deployment and straightforward management.
Choose Bookassist if your hotel values comprehensive features, extensive integrations, and proven performance. Opt for Exely if ease of use, rapid setup, and recent positive reviews are your top priorities.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | — | 起价 $200/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Bookassist 因其知识渊博、反应迅速的客户支持团队而备受赞誉。该团队被描述为专业、积极主动,随时准备帮助解决任何问题或疑问。
该预订引擎因其对酒店经营者和客人的易用性而受到称赞。它通过直观的导航、清晰的行动号召按钮和视觉上吸引人的设计简化了预订流程,从而提高了客人的满意度。
Bookassist 强大的报告和分析功能获得了积极的反馈,因为它提供了有关预订趋势、客户偏好和收入表现的详细见解。这些数据使酒店经营者能够做出明智的决策并优化... Bookassist 强大的报告和分析功能获得了积极的反馈,因为它提供了有关预订趋势、客户偏好和收入表现的详细见解。这些数据使酒店经营者能够做出明智的决策并优化他们的收入策略。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
批评主要针对后端界面,用户建议它可以更加直观和用户友好。经常提到需要简化管理和发布附加组件和软件包的过程。
虽然预订引擎有助于创建各种优惠和套餐,但一些用户发现该过程很麻烦,并希望后端系统具有更大的灵活性和直观性,以便更有效地管理这些套餐。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
支持是Exely在评价中的最大差异之一,许多用户称赞其响应迅速、问题解决有效,以及在设置和日常运营中提供的主动指导。多位用户提到有专门的专家或成功团队协助... 支持是Exely在评价中的最大差异之一,许多用户称赞其响应迅速、问题解决有效,以及在设置和日常运营中提供的主动指导。多位用户提到有专门的专家或成功团队协助酒店优化设置、推出优惠并快速解决问题。
用户常常描述预订引擎直观、快速,客人在完成预订时几乎没有阻碍。他们还指出,清晰的房型/价格展示、流畅的流程以及步骤更少都能提升转化率,尤其是在通过酒店... 用户常常描述预订引擎直观、快速,客人在完成预订时几乎没有阻碍。他们还指出,清晰的房型/价格展示、流畅的流程以及步骤更少都能提升转化率,尤其是在通过酒店官网预订时。
评论者一致认为,Exely 有助于将需求从OTA转向酒店官网,增加直接预订和收入。用户称赞预订引擎、增销工具、促销活动和以转化为导向的设计,帮助酒店销售更多并... 评论者一致认为,Exely 有助于将需求从OTA转向酒店官网,增加直接预订和收入。用户称赞预订引擎、增销工具、促销活动和以转化为导向的设计,帮助酒店销售更多并降低佣金依赖。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户经常提出希望获得更详细、灵活且可定制的报告,涵盖预订、收入、渠道表现和趋势。评审者常说,当前的报告在日常使用中很有用,但在战略分析或快速决策方面还... 用户经常提出希望获得更详细、灵活且可定制的报告,涵盖预订、收入、渠道表现和趋势。评审者常说,当前的报告在日常使用中很有用,但在战略分析或快速决策方面还不够深入,尤其是在移动应用或仪表盘中。
评审者喜欢简洁的界面,但常希望在品牌、部件颜色、确认邮件、网站模板和布局方面拥有更多控制权。部分评论指出,除非增加更多设计灵活性,否则预订引擎和网站可... 评审者喜欢简洁的界面,但常希望在品牌、部件颜色、确认邮件、网站模板和布局方面拥有更多控制权。部分评论指出,除非增加更多设计灵活性,否则预订引擎和网站可能显得过于标准化,尤其是对于希望强化品牌形象的酒店。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Bookassist 和 Exely Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bookassist 提供 72 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Booking Engine 提供 9 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bookassist:否。Exely Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bookassist 的 HT Score 为 32,Exely 的为 97。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐