The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #26 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #46 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #32 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #31 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #31 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #44 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #43 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #32 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #25 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #20 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #11 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue. Both Booking Engine CRS by MyComp and Counter aim to streamline your hotel operations, but they serve different segments and come with distinct strengths.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS is designed as a central reservation platform with a focus on automation, revenue management, and integration into larger hotel systems. Counter, on the other hand, caters specifically to hostels and small accommodations with a straightforward, mobile-friendly interface and a suite of management tools.
Your decision hinges on whether you need an all-encompassing reservation engine or a lightweight, easy-to-use PMS tailored for hostels. Do you want a solution that scales with your property’s growth, or one that simplifies daily management at a lower cost?
Counter has a significantly higher overall rating (4.73/5) based on 54 recent reviews and a 91% likelihood to recommend, making it the more trusted choice among hoteliers. MyComp’s rating is 0/5 with no recent reviews, limiting confidence in its capabilities and customer satisfaction.
Counter’s extensive user base, especially in the hostel segment, and recent positive feedback about ease of use and customer support, make it the more reliable option for small to mid-sized properties. Conversely, MyComp’s lack of recent data and reviews suggests limited current relevance for hoteliers evaluating PMS options.
Does this mean Counter is the clear leader for your property? Let’s explore the specifics.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS is built to integrate with larger hotel systems, offering automation, real-time updates, and detailed analytics. It targets properties seeking to optimize revenue through dynamic pricing and inventory control but has no recent reviews or third-party integrations, raising questions about its current effectiveness.
Counter is tailored for hostels and small accommodations, focusing on simplicity and mobility. Its features include check-in/out management, POS integration, and automated payments—all highly valued by users. The key divergence is that MyComp appears more suited for larger hotel chains or properties with complex revenue management needs, while Counter excels at streamlining daily hostel operations.
Are you looking for a system that can handle complex revenue strategies or one that simplifies guest management? Your choice depends on this core requirement.
If your hotel needs a highly-rated, user-friendly PMS with extensive integrations, Counter is the clear choice. Its 4.73/5 rating from 54 recent reviews, especially from hostel operators, demonstrates its practical value and ease of adoption.
If, however, your property demands advanced revenue management, automation, and integration into a broader reservation ecosystem, MyComp’s offering—despite limited recent reviews—may be more suitable. For small hostels or properties prioritizing simplicity, Counter’s features and user support make it the better fit.
In summary, for small to mid-sized properties focused on ease and support, Counter is the safer bet; for larger, complex operations, you might need to explore other options.
Counter leads with a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating based on reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface, mobile accessibility, and straightforward management tools. Users frequently mention how quickly new staff can learn the system and how responsive the support team is.
MyComp, with a 0/5 rating, provides no recent data on usability. Its lack of reviews suggests limited adoption or confidence from current users, especially in comparison with Counter’s active, positive feedback.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including channel management, online support, group bookings, multi-currency and multilingual options, and a guest CRM. It also provides automation tools like POS integration, automatic payments, and reporting—features critical for operational efficiency in small properties.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS has no listed unique features and appears to serve primarily as a reservation engine without added functionalities like channel management or revenue optimization.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support is rated 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting its responsiveness, helpfulness, and professionalism—specifically mentioning staff like Evelyn and Max. Reviewers note quick replies and proactive problem resolution, underpinning confidence in ongoing support.
MyComp offers no recent data or reviews on customer support, making it impossible to assess current service quality. Based on available information, Counter’s support team is clearly the more reliable and well-regarded.
Edge: Counter.
Counter has 7 verified integrations, including Stripe, Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, and Goki, covering payments, channel management, and property services. MyComp, with zero verified integrations, limits your ability to connect with other platforms.
For properties relying on multiple third-party tools or seeking a flexible, connected system, Counter’s integrations provide significant operational advantages.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s reviews are recent and abundant, with a 4.73/5 rating and a 91% willingness to recommend, particularly among hostel operators and small property owners. MyComp’s lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating reflect very limited current user satisfaction or adoption.
Considering recent feedback, Counter is the preferred choice, especially for properties valuing proven user satisfaction and ongoing support.
Edge: Counter.
Both products do not publicly disclose specific pricing details, indicating potentially customized quotes or costs embedded within broader packages. However, Counter is described as free and easy to implement, particularly suited for hostels and small properties.
MyComp’s lack of available pricing data suggests it might be more complex or targeted at larger clients, potentially with higher costs. For small-hotels and hostels, Counter’s accessible pricing model is an advantage.
MyComp is best for larger properties with sophisticated revenue strategies but may be overkill for small, independent establishments.
Counter is ideal for small to medium-sized properties focused on daily operations and guest experience.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS presents an integrated reservation platform tailored for larger, revenue-focused properties but has no recent reviews or user feedback to substantiate its current effectiveness. Its core strength lies in automation and dynamic pricing, making it suitable for properties with complex revenue needs.
Counter, with its high ratings, robust features, and active support, is the better choice for small to mid-sized hostels and boutique hotels. Its ease of use, extensive integrations, and recent positive reviews make it the safer bet for properties seeking operational simplicity and reliable support.
In conclusion, if your hotel is a small property or hostel seeking a straightforward, well-supported PMS, go with Counter. For larger hotels with sophisticated revenue strategies, explore other options that offer deeper integration and automation—myComp’s offering remains uncertain in today’s market.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Booking Engine CRS 和 Counter 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Booking Engine CRS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Counter 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Booking Engine CRS:否。Counter:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MyComp 的 HT Score 为 0,Counter 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问