The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
BookingSync 表现出色 .
Shiji Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 34 |
在分析了 34 条经验证的评价后,BookingSync 用户最看重其 ,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 易于使用, 支持团队, 执行。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| BookingSync |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
|
+
执行
▾
|
|
|
+
培训材料
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | BookingSync |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #53 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #31 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 13 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #22 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | BookingSync |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #33 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #24 25 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #22 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #45 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | BookingSync |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #33 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #30 8 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #14 5 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #5 14 条评价 |
Choosing between BookingSync and Shiji Daylight PMS hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and scale. Both aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. BookingSync focuses on vacation rentals and small property portfolios, while Shiji Daylight PMS caters to a broader range of hotel types, particularly larger and more complex operations. Given the data, which system aligns better with your goals?
BookingSync is a property management solution primarily tailored for vacation rental managers and boutique hotels, offering channel synchronization, financial reporting, and guest communication tools. It’s designed for property managers looking for automation and multi-channel visibility. Shiji Daylight PMS, on the other hand, is a comprehensive, cloud-native platform built for hotels of all sizes, with a focus on centralizing guest data, automating operations, and scaling across multiple properties.
While BookingSync boasts an easy-to-use platform with integrations for major booking channels, it has a zero-star rating and no recent reviews, indicating limited current user feedback and potential gaps in support and usability. Conversely, Shiji Daylight PMS has a recent, high review count (32 reviews) and a 4.63/5 ease of use rating, demonstrating consistent user satisfaction and ongoing support. Given the recent reviews, Shiji’s broader hotel focus and positive feedback suggest it’s the more reliable choice for modern hotel operations.
If your hotel manages vacation rentals or small boutique properties seeking simple channel management and automated messaging, BookingSync might be suitable—though its lack of recent reviews and zero ratings cast doubt on current performance. For hotels of any size that want a scalable, feature-rich PMS with a proven track record and recent positive reviews, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clear winner. Its extensive feature set, including guest profiles, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, and mobile apps, makes it a versatile choice for growth.
For hotel groups aiming for operational consistency and automation, Shiji’s 98 features and 64 integrations, along with high customer satisfaction scores, underscore its suitability. BookingSync’s limited features and absence of verified partners suggest it’s best for smaller, less complex property portfolios. In this comparison, the choice is straightforward: Shiji Daylight PMS is the more comprehensive, well-supported option for scaling hotel operations.
BookingSync scores a 0/5 for ease of use, with no recent reviews to confirm its user experience. Its platform’s intuitiveness and onboarding process are unverified, which raises concerns about staff adoption and training. Shiji Daylight PMS, however, boasts a 4.63/5 rating, supported by recent reviews praising its user-friendly interface, quick training, and straightforward task management. Many users highlight how intuitive the platform is, even for new staff members.
Given the recent, high-rated feedback, your team will likely find Shiji significantly easier to implement and operate daily. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
BookingSync offers minimal features, mainly focusing on basic channel management and booking synchronization. It lacks the extensive capabilities found in Shiji Daylight PMS, which has 98 unique features—including guest profiles, online check-in/out, digital registration, integrated CRS, payment processing, and automation tools. Shiji also provides advanced modules like housekeeping, task management, automated reminders, and detailed reporting.
The depth and variety of features in Shiji’s system make it suitable for comprehensive hotel management, whereas BookingSync’s limited feature set may restrict your ability to automate complex operations or scale efficiently. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
BookingSync’s support ratings are unavailable, and there are no recent reviews to gauge current service levels. In contrast, Shiji Daylight PMS has a 4.53/5 support rating based on recent reviews, with users praising its responsiveness and professionalism. Support team members are described as helpful, which reduces operational downtime and simplifies onboarding.
If reliable, ongoing support is critical to your hotel’s smooth operation, Shiji’s established service reputation makes it the safer choice. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
BookingSync records zero verified integrations, limiting its connectivity options and integration capacity. Shiji Daylight PMS, however, offers 64 verified partners, including major vendors like SiteMinder, Revinate, Oaky, IDeaS, Duetto, Amadeus, and a host of other technology providers.
This extensive integration ecosystem ensures your hotel can connect with revenue management, marketing, and distribution tools seamlessly. For comprehensive, flexible system connectivity, Shiji clearly leads. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
BookingSync has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Shiji Daylight PMS, with 32 recent reviews, has a high overall rating of 4.63/5 and a Net Promoter Score (NPS) of 8.94/10, with 90% of hoteliers recommending it.
The recent, positive feedback from diverse hotel segments—including luxury and city hotels—reinforces Shiji’s strong reputation among current users. Given the recent reviews and high satisfaction, Shiji is the preferred choice for hoteliers seeking proven value. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
BookingSync does not publicly disclose pricing, nor does it offer a free trial or transparent subscription details. Conversely, Shiji Daylight PMS charges a base fee of approximately $1,200, with no mention of additional implementation or recurring fees, though pricing details are limited and may vary by hotel size.
While both lack detailed tiered pricing options, Shiji’s transparency and clear cost structure make budgeting easier. The absence of publicly available pricing for BookingSync suggests it may be less suitable for hotels seeking predictable expenses. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced automation, detailed reporting, or multi-property management capabilities, as BookingSync’s feature set is limited. It’s also not suitable for large chains or hotels requiring deep integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel is a very small operation with minimal management needs or if you prefer a system without many customization options. Also, hotels seeking a low-cost, no-setup solution might find Shiji’s price point and implementation process unsuitable.
Shiji Daylight PMS stands out as the more complete, well-supported solution, especially for larger hotels or hotel groups. Its 98 features, 64 integrations, and recent high reviews demonstrate its ability to meet complex operational demands.
BookingSync may appeal to small-scale vacation rental managers or boutique hotels seeking basic functionality, but its lack of recent feedback and limited features make it less reliable overall. For hotels aiming to grow, streamline operations, and provide personalized guest experiences, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clear choice.
In summary, if your hotel needs a robust, scalable PMS with extensive features and proven recent support, Shiji Daylight PMS is the superior option. BookingSync might serve smaller, simpler operations, but its limited, outdated data makes it less suitable for modern hotel management.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| BookingSync |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,BookingSync 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | BookingSync |
|
|---|---|---|
| 任务管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 86 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。
石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。
一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。
与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。BookingSync 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。BookingSync 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Shiji Daylight PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
BookingSync:否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。BookingSync 的 HT Score 为 0,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问