项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #47 0 条评价 | #15 34 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #47 0 条评价 | #11 64 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 6 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #50 1 条评价 | #15 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #15 28 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #43 1 条评价 | #16 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #16 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #24 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | #25 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #4 79 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #2 17 条评价 |
Choosing between Bookolo Booking Engine and Exely Booking Engine hinges on what your hotel needs most. While Bookolo boasts no current reviews, making it difficult to gauge its effectiveness, Exely’s platform is backed by 144 recent reviews, a high NPS score of 9.73/10, and a 98% likelihood to recommend. This extensive feedback suggests Exely is the more proven choice for hotels seeking a reliable booking system. But how do they compare on key aspects like features, ease of use, and support?
Bookolo aims to be a modern, flexible reservation system suitable for any hotel size or type, emphasizing straightforward booking and modular tools. In contrast, Exely offers a feature-rich platform with a focus on direct booking growth, marketing tools, and automation, supported by a larger, more recent review database. The absence of reviews for Bookolo means you lack user insights, whereas Exely’s strong, recent review presence indicates a more trusted solution. Are you comfortable adopting a lesser-reviewed platform or do you want the confidence of proven performance?
If your hotel needs a mature, well-reviewed booking engine with high scores in support and ease of use, go with Exely. Its platform suits independent hotels, boutique properties, and chains that prioritize automation, marketing, and direct booking optimization. If, however, your team prefers a newer, customizable system that integrates with existing tools and emphasizes modularity, Bookolo might appeal—though its lack of reviews makes this a risk. Given the data, Exely’s extensive track record makes it the safer, more reliable choice.
Ease of use is a clear strength for Exely, with a rating of 4.91/5 based on recent reviews. Users praise its intuitive dashboard, quick setup, and efficient management tools, with comments like, "The user-friendly dashboard makes managing rates, availability, and reservations smooth and efficient." Conversely, Bookolo’s usability is unverified due to no available reviews, so its actual user-friendliness remains uncertain. For now, your team’s onboarding and daily operation will likely be easier with Exely.
Exely offers 29 unique features, including mobile responsiveness, multi-lingual support, multi-currency, special offers, automated emails, and detailed conversion reports—none of which are available in Bookolo. Bookolo’s feature set appears minimal with no exclusive features listed, while Exely’s extensive capabilities support complex operations and marketing efforts. If advanced features are critical, Exely’s comprehensive suite provides a decisive edge.
Support ratings favor Exely, with a 4.96/5 score and positive comments about rapid responses and helpful guidance. Reviewers say, "Their support is quick and friendly, always ready to help." Bookolo, with no reviews or support ratings, cannot match this level of confidence. For ongoing assistance and troubleshooting, Exely clearly leads.
Exely integrates with 8 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Mews, Booking.com, and others, offering broader connectivity. Bookolo supports only 7 partners, primarily focusing on property management and channel management tools. If your hotel relies on multiple systems, Exely’s wider integration options deliver more flexibility and efficiency.
Exely’s recent reviews overwhelmingly rate it highly, with a 9.73/10 NPS score and 98% likelihood to recommend. Reviews from various hotel segments, including large hotels and boutique properties, praise its ease of use, features, and support. With no reviews for Bookolo, its perceived value remains unknown. Hoteliers seeking proven satisfaction should choose Exely.
Bookolo’s pricing details are unavailable, making it difficult to compare costs directly. Exely charges $200 per month with no free tier or trial, offering transparency but potentially less flexibility for smaller hotels. Your decision may depend on budget constraints and value perception, but Exely’s known pricing provides clarity.
The core difference lies in proven performance: Exely’s extensive recent reviews and high satisfaction scores make it a trusted option, while Bookolo remains unreviewed and untested in the marketplace. For hotels prioritizing reliability, support, and a comprehensive feature set, Exely is the clear choice—its 144 recent reviews and stellar ratings back this up.
When to choose Exely: If your hotel values a well-supported, feature-rich booking engine with proven success across diverse markets, Exely delivers. Its automation tools, marketing features, and broad integrations directly contribute to increasing direct bookings and simplifying operations.
When to choose Bookolo: If your team is eager to experiment with a fresh platform that promises modularity and customization, and you’re willing to accept the risk of unverified user feedback, Bookolo might fit. However, without reviews, you lack the confidence that it will meet your hotel’s operational needs.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a dependable, supported, and feature-packed booking engine, Exely stands out as the better choice. Its proven track record, recent positive reviews, and expansive feature set make it the safer, smarter investment for your team.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评价赞扬Exely的支持团队、客户成功团队和账户经理,因其快速回复、清晰指导以及在设置和日常运营中的主动帮助。多家酒店表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间... 许多评价赞扬Exely的支持团队、客户成功团队和账户经理,因其快速回复、清晰指导以及在设置和日常运营中的主动帮助。多家酒店表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,加快了部署速度,并使平台更易于采用和操作。
用户经常提到,Exely通过集中管理预订、价格、房态和客人信息,简化了日常酒店工作。他们也很看重平台的速度和稳定性,尽管少数评论提到在高峰期加载缓慢或偶尔... 用户经常提到,Exely通过集中管理预订、价格、房态和客人信息,简化了日常酒店工作。他们也很看重平台的速度和稳定性,尽管少数评论提到在高峰期加载缓慢或偶尔出现预订流程问题。
预订引擎一直被描述为易于客人使用、响应迅速、移动端友好,并且能有效将网站访客转化为预订。评测者将其简洁的流程、部件和灵活的预订选项与更高的转化率和更好... 预订引擎一直被描述为易于客人使用、响应迅速、移动端友好,并且能有效将网站访客转化为预订。评测者将其简洁的流程、部件和灵活的预订选项与更高的转化率和更好的客人预订体验联系在一起。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户反复提出的主要需求之一是更详细、可定制的报告和分析。用户希望深入了解预订趋势、转化率、收入来源、渠道表现、预订动态、入住率变化以及仪表盘的灵活性,... 用户反复提出的主要需求之一是更详细、可定制的报告和分析。用户希望深入了解预订趋势、转化率、收入来源、渠道表现、预订动态、入住率变化以及仪表盘的灵活性,以便做出更好的商务和定价决策。
许多评论者希望对预订引擎和网站的外观与体验拥有更多控制权,包括颜色、模板、部件、确认邮件、发票和报表布局。Exely 以简洁的设计受到好评,但买家应注意到对... 许多评论者希望对预订引擎和网站的外观与体验拥有更多控制权,包括颜色、模板、部件、确认邮件、发票和报表布局。Exely 以简洁的设计受到好评,但买家应注意到对更深层次品牌定制和更现代、独特网站风格的反复需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Bookolo Booking Engine 和 Exely Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bookolo Booking Engine 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Booking Engine 提供 9 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Bookolo Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bookolo Booking Engine:否。Exely Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bookolo 的 HT Score 为 0,Exely 的为 96。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐