The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | ButikSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #44 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #25 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #19 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #24 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | ButikSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #28 24 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 26 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #31 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | ButikSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #22 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #24 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #28 1 条评价 |
Choosing between ButikSoft PMS and Infor HMS hinges on what your hotel needs most. Both products aim to streamline operations and improve guest management, but their core offerings and maturity levels differ significantly. ButikSoft's offering appears almost non-existent in reviews, while Infor boasts a robust presence with over 46 recent reviews and a high overall rating. How do these differences influence your decision?
ButikSoft PMS’s lack of recent reviews and zero ratings make it difficult to assess its real-world performance. In contrast, Infor HMS's recent reviews and high ratings (4.04/5 overall, 4.04/5 customer support) paint a clearer picture of a mature, functional system. While ButikSoft might appeal to niche or very small hotels, Infor’s extensive feature set and regional presence suggest broader applicability.
Both products solve core PMS problems—booking management, guest data, and operational workflows. But while Infor offers a wide array of modules like housekeeping, revenue management, and guest CRM, ButikSoft’s minimal feature data raises questions about its capacity. Do you want a solution with proven market presence and extensive features, or are you exploring less-established options?
If your hotel needs a fully functional, established PMS with a broad array of features, go with Infor HMS. Its comprehensive suite includes over 20 unique features like housekeeping, guest profiles, revenue management, and multi-lingual support, making it suitable for mid-to-large hotels aiming for operational efficiency.
If your hotel is small, highly specialized, or testing new PMS solutions without the desire to invest heavily upfront, ButikSoft might appeal due to its minimal implementation requirements. However, with no recent reviews, its ability to meet modern hotel demands remains uncertain. For most hotels seeking reliability, Infor’s proven track record makes it the safer choice.
Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 for ease of use, based on reviews praising its intuitive navigation, mobile accessibility, and quick onboarding—averaging 3.64/5 for onboarding. Reviewers highlight that once users understand the interface, daily tasks become straightforward, and support staff are responsive and helpful.
ButikSoft’s ratings are nonexistent, but the absence of recent reviews suggests limited recent user feedback on usability or onboarding. Given the detailed positive feedback for Infor, Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers 20 unique features, including a housekeeping module, centralized user management, mobile app, multi-currency handling, payment processing, and automated night audit—features that ButikSoft does not list or appear to offer.
Without recent ButikSoft feature data or verified modules, it’s impossible to compare directly, but Infor’s extensive feature set clearly outstrips any minimal offerings from ButikSoft. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor scores 4.04/5 for customer support, with reviews emphasizing responsiveness, professionalism, and helpful guidance—praising their support team’s quick response times. Hoteliers report that support helps resolve issues efficiently, especially during onboarding and updates.
ButikSoft’s support ratings are unavailable, and the lack of recent reviews indicates limited recent customer feedback. Given Infor’s clear positive support reputation, Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor boasts 113 verified partners, with integrations including booking platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, HRS, and more, covering revenue management, CRM, and payment processing. These integrations streamline operations and reduce manual work.
ButikSoft has no verified integrations, which limits its ability to connect with other hotel systems. For hotels seeking seamless operational workflows, Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 recent reviews and an overall rating of 4.04/5, Infor is clearly favored. Users praise its ease of navigation, support, and feature set, with an average recent NPS score of 7.15/5 and 74% likelihood to recommend.
ButikSoft’s review count and ratings are zero, making it impossible to gauge user sentiment. Based on available data, Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for both products are unavailable, suggesting they may not publicly advertise or are custom-priced. Most likely, costs vary based on hotel size, modules, and deployment complexity.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference between ButikSoft and Infor HMS lies in their maturity, feature depth, and market presence. Infor HMS has an established reputation, a broad feature set, and recent positive reviews, making it suitable for most hotels seeking an all-in-one operational platform.
Choose Infor HMS if you need a scalable, feature-rich PMS with proven support and extensive integrations. It’s ideal for hotels that want to streamline operations, improve revenue management, and enhance guest experiences.
ButikSoft’s minimal data and lack of recent reviews suggest it’s less suitable for hotels that require reliability and comprehensive functionality. Its absence from recent feedback implies it might not be ready to meet modern hotel needs.
If your hotel is small, boutique, or testing a new system, ButikSoft might be worth exploring, but for most hotels, Infor HMS offers a safer, more reliable path forward.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ButikSoft PMS 和 Infor HMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ButikSoft PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor HMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ButikSoft PMS:否。Infor HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。ButikSoft 的 HT Score 为 0,Infor 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问