The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #26 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #46 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #32 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #31 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #31 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #44 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #43 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #32 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #25 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #20 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #11 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can dramatically shape your hotel's operational efficiency and guest experience. With Campgest by Campgest and Counter by Counter both targeting hospitality providers, the decision hinges on your property's specific needs and scale. While both products aim to streamline operations, their core features, support, and market presence differ significantly.
Campgest is a niche player with limited reviews and a focus on outdoor hospitality, whereas Counter commands a broader user base, especially among hostels, with more recent, detailed feedback. Are you ready to prioritize extensive support and proven usability? Or are you seeking a specialized tool tailored for outdoor accommodations?
Both Campgest and Counter solve essential property management tasks like reservations, customer communication, and operational automation. However, Campgest's limited review presence and lack of recent feedback make it difficult to assess its current performance reliably. Conversely, Counter boasts 54 reviews over the last six months, with a high 4.73/5 overall rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend—evidence of its active, satisfied user base.
Counter is designed primarily for hostels, with features such as mobile management, POS integration, and group booking tools. Campgest, meanwhile, appears to serve outdoor hospitality businesses like campgrounds and RV parks, focusing on automating bookings and analytics. Do your needs align more with general hotel management or outdoor accommodation operations?
If your property isn't a hostel or outdoor hospitality site, Counter's broad feature set and recent, positive reviews make it the more reliable choice. Is your focus on operational automation, guest management, and support responsiveness? Then Counter stands out as the stronger option.
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel or outdoor hospitality venue, Counter's extensive features tailored for such properties—like group booking, multi-currency support, and ancillary revenue tracking—make it more suitable. Its 19 exclusive features, including channel management, online support, and integrated payment processing, provide a comprehensive toolkit that scales with your operation.
In contrast, Campgest's focus on camping and outdoor sites suggests it’s better suited for campground management rather than traditional hotels. Given Counter's active presence in multiple regions and broad compatibility with integrations like Stripe and Cloudbeds, it offers more flexibility and proven stability for hotels seeking a versatile PMS.
Should your hotel require a system with a strong user base, recent reviews, and a broad feature set, go with Counter. If your operations are strictly outdoor-focused, Campgest might be worth exploring, though its limited recent user feedback warrants caution.
Counter’s UI scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, supported by detailed recent reviews praising its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface. Users highlight its quick onboarding and simple calendar management, making staff training straightforward and reducing operational downtime. Support responsiveness is also a key plus, with many reviews citing prompt assistance from Evelyn and Max.
Campgest, on the other hand, has no available recent review data or ratings, making it impossible to evaluate its current user experience. Its lack of recent feedback suggests limited adoption or activity, which raises questions about ongoing usability improvements or support.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including a channel manager, online booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tools—capabilities that are essential for busy, modern hotels. Its integrated POS system and group booking functionalities directly address common revenue streams and operational needs.
Campgest, by contrast, provides no exclusive features or integrations, focusing mainly on reservation and communication tools for outdoor venues. Its limited feature set lacks the depth of Counter’s platform, which is built to support complex hotel operations.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support scores highly at 4.96/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and professionalism. Hoteliers appreciate the quick, helpful responses, especially from staff like Evelyn and Max, which significantly alleviates operational concerns.
Campgest offers no recent reviews or support ratings, making it challenging to gauge its support quality. The absence of feedback might indicate limited user engagement or ongoing development issues, especially since there are no recent reviews to confirm support responsiveness.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, Cloudbeds, and SiteMinder, facilitating connections with major booking platforms and payment providers. Its ability to streamline multiple income streams and platform connectivity makes it a versatile choice for hotels seeking operational flexibility.
Campgest has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems or channels. For hotels aiming to expand distribution or automate payments through third-party platforms, Counter’s integration options are a significant advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews reveal a high overall score of 4.73/5, with most property types—particularly hostels—expressing confidence in its usability and support. Its active user base and recent positive feedback bolster its reputation as a reliable PMS.
Campgest has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine current user satisfaction. Its lack of recent feedback suggests it’s either a niche or underutilized product, so the hoteliers actively using Counter are clearly the more satisfied group.
Edge: Counter.
Both products do not publicly disclose detailed pricing models. However, Counter’s free tier, combined with the absence of implementation fees and its value for money rating, indicates affordability for small to medium properties. Its subscription-based model is common among SaaS PMS providers.
Campgest does not specify its pricing or whether it offers a free trial or tiered plans, which can complicate budgeting decisions. Given the lack of transparent pricing, Counter’s clear value proposition and active customer support make it the safer financial choice.
Not ideal if you:
Not ideal if you:
Counter and Campgest serve different niches within the hospitality industry, but Counter’s recent reviews, extensive features, and active support make it the more reliable option for most hotels. Its broad integration network and high user satisfaction provide confidence in its ability to scale with your property.
Choose Counter if your hotel values a well-supported, feature-rich platform with proven usability and ongoing development. Campgest may appeal if your focus is strictly outdoor camping or RV sites, but the limited recent feedback warrants caution before committing.
For general hotel operations seeking a trusted, feature-packed PMS, Counter is the clear choice. If your property falls into a specialized outdoor niche, consider Campgest, but ensure your decision aligns with your operational priorities and future growth plans.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Campgest 和 Counter 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Campgest 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Counter 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Campgest:否。Counter:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Campgest 的 HT Score 为 0,Counter 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问