The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 收益管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #29 3 条评价 | #43 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #21 5 条评价 | #24 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 18 条评价 | #7 19 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #6 9 条评价 | #11 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 17 条评价 | #24 19 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 24 条评价 | #18 23 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #11 12 条评价 | #15 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #23 2 条评价 | #35 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 36 条评价 | #22 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 1 条评价 | #28 6 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #19 0 条评价 | #7 21 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #16 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right revenue management system (RMS) is a pivotal decision for your hotel, directly impacting profitability, operational efficiency, and strategic planning. Both Cendyn Guestrev and Infor EzRMS aim to optimize your pricing and forecast accuracy, but they approach these goals differently. Your ideal choice hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific needs—are you looking for a system with a broad feature set and recent user feedback, or one that offers deep integration with enterprise tools?
Cendyn Guestrev stands out with its higher overall rating and more recent reviews, indicating a more active user base and ongoing support. Conversely, Infor EzRMS is well-known for its extensive reporting capabilities and global presence, though it has fewer recent reviews and a slightly lower NPS score. Which system aligns better with your operational priorities?
Both Cendyn Guestrev and Infor EzRMS serve the core function of revenue optimization, but they differ significantly in scope and user experience. Guestrev emphasizes real-time adaptability, intuitive user interfaces, and customizable dashboards, making it attractive for hotels seeking ease of use and flexible insights. EzRMS, meanwhile, offers robust data analysis and extensive reporting, favored by larger chains and hotels with complex operational needs.
Cendyn’s higher overall rating (4.32/5) and 38 recent reviews suggest a more engaged user community, with hoteliers praising its ease of use and support. Infor’s comparable rating (4.46/5) is based on slightly fewer reviews, and its recent review count (0 in the last 6 months) indicates less current feedback, which can be a concern if ongoing support and updates are priorities. Are you leaning toward a more user-friendly platform or one with deep, data-driven insights?
If your hotel needs an easy-to-navigate RMS with strong customer support and recent positive feedback, Cendyn Guestrev is the better fit. Its features include predictive analytics, multi-property management, and intuitive dashboards, making it suitable for hotels that value simplicity without sacrificing sophistication.
If your hotel requires an extensive suite of reporting tools, automated controls, and integration with enterprise systems, Infor EzRMS is a solid choice. It’s particularly beneficial for larger or multi-property hotels that want detailed trend analysis, demand forecasting, and flexible rate recommendations.
For hotels prioritizing ease of adoption and ongoing support, go with Cendyn. For those needing comprehensive data analysis and automation at scale, Infor may be preferable.
Cendyn Guestrev enjoys a user-friendly interface with a rating of 4.41/5 and recent reviews lauding its straightforward navigation and quick onboarding. Users mention that the system’s dashboards and reporting tools are intuitive, reducing training time and encouraging staff adoption. Support from Cendyn’s team is consistently praised, often described as responsive and helpful, which enhances the onboarding experience.
In contrast, Infor EzRMS has a slightly higher ease-of-use rating (4.49/5), with users appreciating its accessible interface and clear reporting options. However, some reviews note that its advanced features require specific knowledge and training, which can slow initial adoption. Given the more recent review activity and higher overall support ratings, Edge: Cendyn Guestrev.
Cendyn Guestrev offers a broader feature set—42 exclusive features—including analytics dashboards, data visualization, automated data gathering, AI optimization, and scenario analysis. These capabilities enable hotels to perform detailed forecasting, yield management, and performance tracking, often exceeding standard RMS offerings.
Infor EzRMS provides 9 unique features, such as task management, CRM, content management, and smart spreading technology. While valuable, these are less extensive than Cendyn’s, making Guestrev the more comprehensive choice for hotels seeking advanced tools.
Edge: Cendyn Guestrev.
Customer support ratings favor Cendyn Guestrev, with a score of 4.4/5, and reviews frequently highlight its responsive, knowledgeable team. Hoteliers mention that support staff hold their hand through implementation and troubleshooting, often describing their assistance as “easy to work with” and “quick to resolve issues.”
Infor EzRMS’s support score is 4.04/5, with some reviews citing delays or broken functionalities after updates, which can hinder productivity. Support is generally effective but less consistent compared to Cendyn’s praised responsiveness.
Edge: Cendyn Guestrev.
Cendyn Guestrev boasts 116 verified integration partners, including key PMS, channel managers, and revenue tools like Visual Matrix PMS, RoomRaccoon, and HotelTime. These integrations facilitate smoother data flow and operational consistency.
Infor EzRMS has 113 verified partners, sharing many with Cendyn, such as TrustYou and SiteMinder, but it also includes unique integrations like Trevo and Birchstreet. Despite similar counts, Cendyn’s slightly larger partner ecosystem suggests marginally better integration flexibility.
Edge: Cendyn Guestrev.
Based on recent reviews, hoteliers rate Infor EzRMS slightly higher at 4.46/5 compared to Cendyn’s 4.32/5, but Cendyn’s recent review activity (1 review in the last 6 months) provides more current insights.
Cendyn’s property ratings include 4.59/5 for luxury hotels and 4.58/5 for branded hotels, reflecting high satisfaction among sophisticated users. EzRMS performs well with an overall 4.44/5, especially among mid-sized and chain hotels, but some users report forecast inaccuracies impacting ratings.
Given the recency and volume of reviews, Edge: Cendyn Guestrev.
Cendyn Guestrev charges a base price of $700 per month; no free tier or trial is available. Pricing details for Infor EzRMS are not publicly disclosed, but it is known to be a larger enterprise solution with potentially higher implementation costs.
If budget transparency is crucial, budget for Cendyn’s flat monthly fee, but consider that Infor’s pricing may involve custom quotes depending on scale and modules.
Hotels that will benefit most from Cendyn Guestrev:
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on extensive automation, integrated enterprise tools, or complex workflows that require specialized modules.
Hotels that are suitable for Infor EzRMS:
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a straightforward, user-friendly interface or has limited IT support, as the system’s advanced features require specific expertise.
Cendyn Guestrev and Infor EzRMS both aim to optimize revenue, but they serve different hotel profiles and operational needs. Guestrev offers a user-friendly experience, rapid onboarding, and a broad feature set, making it ideal for hotels seeking quick, reliable revenue management support. EzRMS, with its comprehensive reporting and automation, appeals more to larger hotels or groups with complex, data-heavy operations.
Choose Cendyn Guestrev if your hotel prioritizes ease of use, recent reviews, and support. Opt for Infor EzRMS if your hotel has the scale and sophistication to leverage its detailed analysis, automation, and extensive integrations.
In conclusion, the better system depends on your hotel’s size, complexity, and strategic priorities. Given the current review activity and higher overall ratings, Cendyn Guestrev emerges as the more trusted and versatile choice for most hotels seeking effective revenue management today.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cendyn 提供强大的报告工具,用户认为这些工具对于了解市场地位和制定战略决策非常有用。将数据导出到 Excel 的功能尤其受到好评。不过,一些酒店经营者呼吁对报... Cendyn 提供强大的报告工具,用户认为这些工具对于了解市场地位和制定战略决策非常有用。将数据导出到 Excel 的功能尤其受到好评。不过,一些酒店经营者呼吁对报告进行更多定制,并提高报告的可访问性,以满足他们的独特需求。
Cendyn 以其用户友好的界面和直观的设计而闻名,新用户可以轻松上手和操作该系统。这有助于提高员工使用率,确保日常运营高效。
酒店经营者对 Cendyn 提供动态和准确预测的能力表示赞赏,这使他们能够做出数据驱动的决策,从而优化收入。然而,一些用户报告偶尔会出现不准确的预测,尤其是在... 酒店经营者对 Cendyn 提供动态和准确预测的能力表示赞赏,这使他们能够做出数据驱动的决策,从而优化收入。然而,一些用户报告偶尔会出现不准确的预测,尤其是在 COVID-19 等不可预测的事件期间,这凸显了对更可靠的预测模型的需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
评论经常强调使用 Cendyn 调整费率的便捷性和效率。该系统允许快速修改费率,以应对特殊事件、旺季和不断变化的市场条件,从而直接对收入产生积极影响。然而,一... 评论经常强调使用 Cendyn 调整费率的便捷性和效率。该系统允许快速修改费率,以应对特殊事件、旺季和不断变化的市场条件,从而直接对收入产生积极影响。然而,一些用户希望有更大的灵活性来随时处理调整。
Cendyn 提供用户喜欢的高水平定制,使他们能够根据自己的特定业务需求定制系统。然而,有人要求提供更多可定制选项,特别是在报告和某些操作设置方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
EzRMS 的客户支持因其响应能力和效率而受到高度赞扬,特别是在快速解决技术问题方面。不过,有人建议延长支持时间,并针对特定市场设立专门的团队。
EzRMS 的报告套件因其灵活性和深度而受到称赞,可进行全面的数据比较和趋势分析。它对于回顾性和预测性业务监控都很有效,有助于更好地进行战略规划和决策。
该系统为预测提供了广泛的支持,减少了收益经理的手动输入,并提供了可操作的见解。然而,一些用户认为系统的预测有时不准确,需要进一步改进以提高可靠性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
EzRMS 提供详细的费率建议,用户认为这有助于优化收入。但是,一些用户报告称,费率上传的准确性和自动化程度存在困难,并且与其他系统的同步仍有改进空间,以防... EzRMS 提供详细的费率建议,用户认为这有助于优化收入。但是,一些用户报告称,费率上传的准确性和自动化程度存在困难,并且与其他系统的同步仍有改进空间,以防止出现费率差异等问题。
尽管最近算法更新后有所改善,但许多用户仍反映 EzRMS 的预测准确性存在问题。人们普遍认为,尽管该工具功能强大,但预测有时会与实际结果存在很大差异,尤其是... 尽管最近算法更新后有所改善,但许多用户仍反映 EzRMS 的预测准确性存在问题。人们普遍认为,尽管该工具功能强大,但预测有时会与实际结果存在很大差异,尤其是在 COVID-19 疫情等动态条件下。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cendyn Guestrev 和 Infor EzRMS 共享许多核心 Revenue Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cendyn Guestrev 提供 116 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor EzRMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor EzRMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cendyn Guestrev:否。Infor EzRMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Revenue Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cendyn 的 HT Score 为 73,Infor 的为 25。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问