The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
CheckInn Systems 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment & Authorizations.
MyStay 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Segmentation & Targeting and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).
基于 HTR 上 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | From $400/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 43 |
在分析了 43 条经验证的评价后,CheckInn Systems 用户最看重其 ,而 MyStay 用户则强调 无接触办理入住, 宾客体验, 宾客沟通。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
无接触办理入住
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客体验
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
|
+
支持与持续改进
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制选项
▾
|
|
|
−
与 PMS 集成
▾
|
|
|
−
系统速度和性能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 15 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 10 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #8 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #5 12 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #4 11 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #5 12 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #7 3 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #4 32 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #4 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right contactless check-in solution can significantly impact your hotel's efficiency, guest satisfaction, and operational costs. Comparing CheckIn Systems' Kiosk Solutions by CheckInn Systems and MyStay Check-in reveals key differences in reviews, features, and market presence. While CheckInn Systems has limited recent feedback and zero reviews, MyStay boasts a substantial review base from the last six months, making it the more reliable indicator of effectiveness today.
Both products aim to automate and digitize the check-in process, but they diverge in usability, integrations, and global reach. How do they stack up across critical hotelier needs?
CheckInn Systems' Kiosk Solutions is a visitor management platform designed primarily to streamline security and visitor entry, with features like document scanning, ID verification, and multi-lingual support. However, it has a glaring lack of recent reviews, totaling none in the last six months, and a zero overall rating from HotelTechReport, indicating no current user feedback. This absence of recent data makes it challenging to assess its current performance or user satisfaction.
In contrast, MyStay Check-in is a contactless platform with 40 reviews in the last six months, an overall rating of 5/5, and a high NPS score of 9.8/10. Its recent reviews highlight ease of use, excellent support, and high customer satisfaction, with 98% of hoteliers inclined to recommend it. Given the recent feedback, MyStay appears to be the more trustworthy and effective solution currently.
While CheckInn Systems may focus more on visitor security and compliance, MyStay emphasizes guest experience, automation, and operational efficiency. Are you prioritizing security protocols or guest convenience?
If your hotel needs a visitor management system primarily for security, access control, and compliance, CheckInn Systems might seem suitable. Its features like document scanning and multi-lingual support can help manage guest verification and security protocols.
However, if your goal is to provide a fully contactless, guest-centric check-in experience that reduces staffing costs and enhances guest satisfaction, MyStay is the clear choice. It offers 12 unique features like digital check-in, automated communication, and online payments—plus a proven track record backed by recent reviews and a high NPS score.
For properties seeking to streamline operations and improve guest interactions, MyStay’s broader feature set and recent solid reputation make it the most reliable choice.
CheckInn Systems scores a zero in ease of use, with no recent reviews or user ratings to confirm its user experience. Its interface and onboarding process are undocumented in recent feedback, raising questions about its current usability and staff adoption.
MyStay, on the other hand, boasts a 4.91/5 rating for ease of use, with many hoteliers praising its simple setup and intuitive interface. Reviewers mention that onboarding is straightforward, and staff adoption is smooth, with some users calling it “the easiest system to implement.”
Edge: MyStay.
CheckInn Systems offers 14 unique features, including custom questions, terms signing, document scanning, ID verification, multi-lingual support, and pre-arrival upselling. These are tailored more toward security and compliance, but many are not directly related to guest check-in automation.
MyStay provides 12 features, including PMS integration, guest segmentation, room upgrades, multi-channel messaging, digital payments, and self-service kiosks. Its features support a more complete guest journey, from pre-arrival to post-stay, and focus on operational efficiency.
Given the total feature counts (CheckInn: 14, MyStay: 12), the real distinction is in usability and focus. MyStay’s features are more aligned with guest experience and operational automation.
Edge: MyStay.
CheckInn Systems has no recent reviews or reported customer support ratings, leaving its support quality unverified in today’s context. This absence raises concerns about ongoing responsiveness, especially for hotels needing prompt assistance.
MyStay, with a 4.93/5 customer support score and numerous recent reviews, is highly praised for its quick and helpful support team. Hoteliers note that support is responsive, with many mentioning their support team resolving issues swiftly and professionally.
Edge: MyStay.
CheckInn Systems appears to have no verified integrations with other hotel solutions, limiting its flexibility in modern hotel tech stacks.
MyStay integrates with 30 verified partners, including major PMS providers like Priority Software, RoomRaccoon, and apaleo. It also connects with channel managers, property management tools, and other hotel tech systems, making it a more adaptable solution for hotels with existing technology ecosystems.
Edge: MyStay.
CheckInn Systems, with zero recent reviews, cannot be rated by current hoteliers, leaving its reputation and usability unverified.
MyStay’s recent reviews highlight a 5/5 rating from 39 users in various segments, especially hotel types like serviced apartments and boutique hotels. Its high review count and recent positive feedback confirm strong user satisfaction, with many praising its ease of use and support.
Edge: MyStay.
Both products are priced at a flat $400 per month, with no mention of implementation fees or trial options. The pricing structure is straightforward, but the value depends heavily on the features and support delivered.
Since CheckInn Systems lacks recent reviews and verified performance data, assessing true value is difficult. MyStay’s consistent positive feedback suggests it offers good value for the monthly fee given its feature set and support.
Edge: MyStay.
CheckInn Systems is a visitor management solution aimed at security and compliance, with limited recent user feedback and features focused on guest verification. Its lack of recent reviews suggests it may not be the best choice for hotels seeking modern, automated guest check-in solutions today.
MyStay is a contactless check-in platform with current, positive reviews, high user satisfaction, and a broad feature set supporting guest automation, communication, and integrations. It is clearly the superior choice for hotels looking to streamline operations and improve guest experience.
If your hotel needs a reliable, well-supported, guest-focused contactless check-in platform, go with MyStay. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive integrations make it the safer, more proven investment.
Choose CheckInn Systems only if security and compliance are your top priorities and you are prepared to evaluate its suitability without recent user insights. For operational automation and guest satisfaction, MyStay remains the recommended solution.
非接触式办理入住 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $400/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CheckIn Systems Kiosk Solutions 和 MyStay Check in 共享 2 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 分割 | ||
| 多渠道推送(电子邮件、短信、WhatsApp、聊天) | ||
| 客户细分与定向 | ||
| 客房升级商品 | ||
| 文件和护照扫描 | ||
| 条款和条件签署 | ||
| 经前管理系统整合 | ||
| 自定义问题 | ||
| 营销传播选择加入 | ||
| 身份验证 | ||
| 辅助产品营销 | ||
| 预注册信息收集 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 14 项功能存在差异。
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户... 评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户欣赏它为他们的操作带来的易用性和效率。
评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是... 评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是宾客满意度更高。
许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和... 许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和及时解决疑问来提高客人满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需... 用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需求。
MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一... MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一些用户确实偶尔会遇到 MyStay 和 PMS 之间的同步问题。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CheckIn Systems Kiosk Solutions 和 MyStay Check in 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。CheckIn Systems Kiosk Solutions 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 MyStay Check in 提供 30 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。MyStay Check in 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CheckIn Systems Kiosk Solutions:否。MyStay Check in:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CheckInn Systems 的 HT Score 为 0,MyStay 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问