The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 3 条评价 | #3 27 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #22 0 条评价 | #3 41 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #18 1 条评价 | #5 8 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 28 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #21 1 条评价 | #9 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #18 0 条评价 | #4 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #16 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | #2 79 条评价 |
Your hotel aims to streamline the contactless check-in process, enhance guest experience, and automate operations. Both Chekin by CheKin and straiv by straiv offer solutions to meet these needs, but they diverge in focus, features, and user feedback. Chekin emphasizes comprehensive automation and integrations, while straiv concentrates on contactless, guest-friendly digital journeys. Which platform aligns best with your property's specific demands?
Chekin and straiv both help automate contactless check-in, but they approach the challenge differently. Chekin offers a broader set of features such as guest registration, document scanning, and custom branding, making it suitable for hotels seeking extensive automation and integration. Straiv, however, simplifies the guest journey with mobile check-in/out, guest messaging, and digital concierge functions, emphasizing ease of use and contactless services without requiring app downloads. Do you prioritize feature depth or guest-centered simplicity?
Chekin’s current user base includes vacation rentals, city hotels, and hostels, with a focus on property management automation. Straiv mostly serves boutique, branded, and serviced apartments, showing strength in contactless guest experience and operational efficiency. Chekin’s more extensive feature set is backed by fewer recent reviews, while straiv’s recent reviews—eight in the last six months—indicate a more active and current user base. Given the stronger review activity for straiv, it’s a more current choice for hotels prioritizing recent feedback.
If your hotel needs deep automation, integrations, and customizable branding, Chekin is the better fit. Its features like online deposits, multi-lingual support, and document scanning cater to larger or more complex operations looking to streamline check-in and compliance tasks.
Conversely, if your hotel values a quick, contactless guest experience with minimal guest app interaction, straiv is preferable. It excels in digital check-in/out, guest messaging, and digital concierge services, ideal for properties focusing on guest convenience and operational simplicity. Your choice depends on whether automation depth or guest ease is your top priority.
Chekin scores slightly higher in ease of use, with a rating of 4.67/5, compared to straiv’s 4.69/5. Both platforms are praised for intuitive interfaces, with Chekin’s onboarding rated at 4.33/5 and straiv’s at 4.62/5—straiv’s onboarding is notably smoother. Customer support ratings are close, but straiv edges slightly ahead at 4.72/5 versus Chekin’s 4.5/5, reflecting a more recent and active support presence. Overall, straiv’s interface and support are just a bit more current and user-friendly.
Edge: straiv.
Chekin boasts 12 features exclusive to its platform, including hotel website check-in portals, document scanning, multi-lingual support, and PCI compliance—features that enhance automation and security. Straiv offers 10 unique features centered on guest engagement and contactless interaction, such as mobile check-in/out, guest messaging, and room service ordering.
Chekin’s feature set is more comprehensive for property management automation, while straiv’s features focus on streamlining guest flow and digital services. For properties needing extensive automation, Chekin’s feature count gives it the edge.
Edge: Chekin.
Straiv’s support ratings are slightly higher at 4.72/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and proactive updates. Chekin’s support, rated at 4.5/5, receives positive feedback but has fewer recent reviews, making straiv’s support more current and reliable.
Guests and hoteliers report straiv’s team as helpful, quick to resolve issues, and actively improving the platform. For ongoing, responsive assistance, straiv takes the lead.
Edge: straiv.
Chekin integrates with 20 verified partners, including major PMS providers like RoomRaccoon, HotelTime, and Guesty. Straiv connects with 36 verified partners, notably integrating with Oracle Suite 8, Protel, and Vingcard, along with other hotel systems.
While both platforms have strong integration options, straiv’s larger partner network and notable integrations with enterprise PMS systems provide greater flexibility. If extensive third-party integration is vital, straiv’s broader ecosystem is advantageous.
Edge: straiv.
Straiv’s recent reviews—eight from the last six months—highlight an overall rating of 4.81/5, with a 95% likelihood to recommend, indicating high satisfaction. Chekin’s reviews are sparse, with only six reviews in total and none recent, and an overall rating of 0/5, which suggests limited current data and potentially outdated feedback.
Given the volume and recency of straiv’s reviews, hoteliers rate straiv significantly higher, particularly for its usability and support. Straiv’s ongoing customer feedback makes it the more trusted choice today.
Edge: straiv.
Chekin’s pricing is a flat rate of $400 per month, with no free tier or trial, indicating a predictable cost structure. Straiv’s base price is $500 per month, also without a free tier or trial, but slightly more expensive.
Both platforms lack flexible tiered pricing or trial options, so your decision may hinge on feature needs rather than cost alone. Chekin’s slightly lower price point might appeal if budget is a concern.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, values simplicity, or doesn’t need extensive automation.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive automation features or complex integrations.
Chekin and straiv both aim to simplify contactless check-in but serve different hotel segments and operational styles. Chekin’s broader features and integrations make it suitable for larger or more automation-reliant properties, while straiv’s ease of use, recent positive reviews, and guest-centric features favor smaller to mid-sized hotels emphasizing guest experience.
If your hotel requires in-depth automation and customization, Chekin offers more comprehensive tools. For properties prioritizing a smooth, contactless guest journey with quick setup, straiv is the better choice.
In conclusion, straiv’s active user base and recent review momentum position it as the stronger option for today’s hoteliers seeking a straightforward, contactless check-in platform. Chekin remains valuable for complex operations needing extensive automation, but its limited recent feedback warrants caution.
This detailed analysis should guide your decision-making process by aligning your hotel’s specific needs with each platform’s strengths.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
数字化入住和退房受到称赞,因为它大大减少了客人的等待时间和员工的行政负担。评论强调了非接触式流程的好处,尤其是在 COVID-19 时期,它为客人提供了无缝灵活... 数字化入住和退房受到称赞,因为它大大减少了客人的等待时间和员工的行政负担。评论强调了非接触式流程的好处,尤其是在 COVID-19 时期,它为客人提供了无缝灵活的入住和退房服务,同时确保遵守健康安全协议。
用户对通过旅程邮件和其他可定制模块直接与客人沟通的能力表示赞赏。这有助于及时交换信息、提供促销优惠并提高整体客人满意度。评论称赞了根据酒店个人需求设计... 用户对通过旅程邮件和其他可定制模块直接与客人沟通的能力表示赞赏。这有助于及时交换信息、提供促销优惠并提高整体客人满意度。评论称赞了根据酒店个人需求设计客人互动的灵活性。
Straiv 因其系统易于实施而获得高度评价,无需高级 IT 技能。评论一致提到该工具的直观用户界面,使员工和客人都可以轻松地与系统交互。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户报告了支付处理功能存在的问题,例如延迟和数据传输不完整。建议改进集成多个支付网关的功能,以提高效率和可靠性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Chekin 和 straiv 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。Chekin 提供 20 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 straiv 提供 37 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Chekin 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Chekin:否。straiv:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CheKin 的 HT Score 为 0,straiv 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问