The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 120 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Ciaobooking 表现出色 .
CiHMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Resorts 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Housekeeping module.
基于 HTR 上 120 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 120 |
在分析了 120 条经验证的评价后,Ciaobooking 用户最看重其 ,而 CiHMS 用户则强调 operational efficiency, 高级报告, 任务和资源管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
|
|
+
任务和资源管理
▾
|
|
|
+
基于云的可访问性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级报告
▾
|
|
|
−
用户培训和入职
▾
|
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #45 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #20 31 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 43 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 31 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #15 65 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #10 83 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #15 40 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #17 15 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #65 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #58 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #6 117 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #24 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Ciaobooking by Ciaobooking and CiHMS by CiHMS comes down to your hotel’s specific operational needs and growth ambitions. While both platforms aim to streamline property management, their core capabilities and market presence differ significantly, influencing which might serve your hotel best.
Ciaobooking remains largely untested with no recent reviews or active user feedback, making it difficult to assess its current reliability or features. Conversely, CiHMS boasts over 101 recent reviews, a high NPS score of 9.8, and a solid reputation for customer support and ease of use. Is your hotel prepared to rely on a system with proven performance? Or are you willing to consider an unverified platform?
Ciaobooking, despite its zero review count, aims to provide a property management solution, but the lack of user feedback raises questions about its actual functionality and support quality. CiHMS, on the other hand, has been rated highly for ease of use, with a 4.9/5 rating from over 100 reviews, and support that reviewers describe as "professional" and "responsive."
The core difference lies in their market presence and trustworthiness: CiHMS has established itself across multiple regions including Asia Pacific, Middle East, and Africa, whereas Ciaobooking has none. Both address basic PMS needs, but only CiHMS provides a comprehensive, multi-feature platform with proven customer satisfaction. Do you prefer a product with confirmed user experiences? Or are you open to trialing a new, untested system?
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich PMS with high customer satisfaction, go with CiHMS. It’s suitable for properties aiming to optimize operations across multiple channels, benefit from integrated revenue management, and enjoy strong support, especially if scalability and real-time insights are priorities.
If your hotel is small, or you’re exploring options without immediate need for extensive features, Ciaobooking might seem tempting—but remember, it has no recent reviews or verified support. It’s better suited if you’re willing to test an unproven platform, but caution is advised given the limited data.
For hotels seeking an established system with a broad feature set and regional support, CiHMS is the clear choice. Conversely, if budget constraints or experimental approaches matter most, then Ciaobooking could potentially fit, but with significant caveats.
In terms of user-friendliness, CiHMS’s reviews consistently praise its intuitive interface, with a 4.9/5 rating based on more than 100 recent reviews. Users mention its "lean UI" and straightforward navigation, which reduces onboarding time and accelerates staff adoption.
Ciaobooking, with a score of 0/5, offers no recent feedback or user ratings, making it impossible to judge its usability. Without customer reviews or ratings, its ease of use remains unverified.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS offers a suite of 33 features, including a channel manager, revenue management, integrated CRS, booking engine, task management, mobile app, multi-currency, and automated night audit, among others. These features address the full spectrum of hotel management needs and are specifically designed for scalability.
Ciaobooking, with no listed features or verified integrations, provides no insight into its capabilities or how it compares in breadth or depth. Given its lack of features, CiHMS clearly leads in this category.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s customer support is highly rated at 4.92/5, with users describing the support team as "professional" and "responsive." Many reviewers highlight the value of 24/7 support and efficient onboarding, which are critical for ongoing hotel operations.
Ciaobooking scores a 0/5, with no recent reviews, support ratings, or feedback available. Its support quality remains unknown, but the absence of reviews suggests a lack of proven service.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS is verified to have 3 integrations, including SiteMinder, DerbySoft, and Easyway, facilitating multi-channel reservations and distribution. It also offers a wide array of features that can be integrated into existing hotel workflows.
Ciaobooking has no verified integrations listed, reflecting either limited connectivity options or a lack of user feedback confirming compatibility. For hotels that rely on multiple sales channels and integrations, CiHMS offers a distinct advantage.
Edge: CiHMS.
Given the lack of recent reviews or ratings for Ciaobooking, it cannot be confidently rated or compared. CiHMS’s reviews, on the other hand, provide a 4.9/5 user rating, with a 9.8/10 NPS score, indicating strong overall satisfaction.
CiHMS’s hotel users span segments including resorts, city center hotels, and large properties, with recent feedback emphasizing improved operational efficiency and guest experience. Its high review volume and recent ratings make it the more trusted product.
Edge: CiHMS.
Ciaobooking does not list any pricing information, which suggests that it may be unpriced or not yet commercially available. CiHMS has a transparent base price of $900/month, with no additional implementation or hidden fees.
For hotels needing predictable costs, CiHMS’s clear pricing model offers peace of mind, whereas Ciaobooking’s unknown pricing makes budgeting uncertain.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Ciaobooking is an untested platform with no recent reviews, leaving its capabilities and support quality uncertain. It might appeal to small or experimental properties but lacks the proven track record of CiHMS.
CiHMS, with its robust feature set, high user ratings, and regional support, is well-suited for hotels aiming to improve operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. It’s the safer, more reliable choice for properties that require a comprehensive PMS.
If your hotel needs a trusted, well-supported system with proven features, go with CiHMS. Its high review count and recent positive feedback make it the clear leader in today’s market.
Choose Ciaobooking if you’re willing to explore a less proven platform, understanding the risks involved. For most hotels looking for stability, functionality, and support, CiHMS remains the superior option.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Ciaobooking |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Ciaobooking 和 CiHMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 21 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Ciaobooking 和 CiHMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Ciaobooking 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 CiHMS 提供 3 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Ciaobooking:否。CiHMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Ciaobooking 的 HT Score 为 0,CiHMS 的为 81。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问