The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Ciaobooking 表现出色 .
roommaster 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
基于 HTR 上 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 100 |
在分析了 100 条经验证的评价后,Ciaobooking 用户最看重其 ,而 roommaster 用户则强调 客户支持, 预订管理, 集中式数据管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
集中式数据管理
▾
|
|
|
+
云和移动访问
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
|
−
用户界面体验
▾
|
|
|
−
团体预订功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #30 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 54 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #31 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #32 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #22 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #34 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #24 15 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #27 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #10 62 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #29 11 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can determine how smoothly your hotel operates daily. Both Ciaobooking and roommaster aim to streamline hotel workflows, but they serve very different needs and customer bases. Ciaobooking’s zero-rated review score signals a lack of user feedback, while roommaster’s over 83 reviews and a 4.33/5 overall rating reflect more established market presence. Are you prioritizing a system with proven user satisfaction or exploring newer options?
Ciaobooking and roommaster are designed to solve core hotel management challenges—reservation automation, guest data, and operational control—but they diverge significantly in maturity and features. Ciaobooking, with no verified reviews, appears untested in real-world hotel settings, whereas roommaster’s extensive review base demonstrates its adoption across diverse property types. If your hotel needs a reliable, well-reviewed platform, roommaster is the safer choice. Do you want a new vendor with unproven feedback or an established system with proven results?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive PMS with extensive features, proven customer support, and a strong track record, go with roommaster. It caters well to medium and large hotels requiring advanced workflows, automation, and reporting. Conversely, if your hotel is experimenting with PMS vendors or seeks a no-fee, minimal-feature solution, Ciaobooking might be suitable—though the lack of reviews raises questions about its reliability.
For hotels that prioritize robust features like channel management, revenue management, and integrated POS, roommaster is the clear pick. Smaller properties or startups open to testing unverified platforms could consider Ciaobooking but should do so cautiously.
Roommaster’s 4.22/5 ease of use rating and 17 recent reviews highlight a user-friendly interface appreciated by both novice and experienced staff. Users praise its straightforward navigation and efficient workflows, although some mention needing better report customization. Ciaobooking, with no reviews or ratings, offers no data on usability and likely lacks the extensive onboarding and support found with roommaster.
Edge: roommaster.
Roommaster’s 60+ features include channel management, revenue optimization, guest profiles, integrated POS, and automated reports—many of which are absent in Ciaobooking. The latter offers no verified features, making it difficult to gauge its capabilities. If advanced automation, integrations, and operational modules are non-negotiable, roommaster offers a significant advantage.
Edge: roommaster.
Roommaster’s support rating of 4.25/5 from 83 reviews and recent positive comments about quick responses underscore its stronger reputation. Users mention fast troubleshooting and helpful staff, although some call for more consistent service. Ciaobooking’s support experience remains unverified due to the lack of reviews, making roommaster the more dependable choice for ongoing assistance.
Edge: roommaster.
Roommaster’s 56 verified partners include major channel managers, booking engines, and third-party tools like Sage, Volo, and GuestCentric. Ciaobooking’s partnerships are unverified, with no confirmed integrations listed. If seamless connectivity and automation are vital, roommaster’s extensive integration network provides a clear edge.
Edge: roommaster.
Roommaster’s 83 reviews with a 4.33/5 rating span multiple hotel segments, including boutique, resort, and city center properties, with recent reviews emphasizing ease of use and support. Ciaobooking has no reviews, so it cannot be rated or compared effectively. Based on available data, roommaster’s reputation is well established among hoteliers.
Edge: roommaster.
Ciaobooking offers no publicly available pricing information, suggesting a custom or undisclosed quote. Roommaster’s fee starts at $500 monthly, with no free tier or trial, indicating a significant investment but also transparency. Your hotel should weigh the need for detailed features against the cost when choosing.
The core difference lies in market presence and feature completeness: roommaster provides a mature, feature-rich platform backed by hundreds of reviews, while Ciaobooking remains untested and under-reviewed. If your hotel values proven operations and extensive support, roommaster’s combination of features, reviews, and integration options makes it the clear choice.
Choose roommaster if your property is medium to large, needs robust automation, and values a system with a long track record. Opt for Ciaobooking only if your hotel is small, testing, or willing to accept the risk associated with an unreviewed product. In most cases, roommaster’s established performance and user feedback outweigh the uncertainty of newer, less-reviewed platforms.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Ciaobooking |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Ciaobooking 和 roommaster PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 48 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的... 虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的服务体验。
预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配... 预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配列表和团体入住登记方面仍有改进空间。
RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全... RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全平台上的做法,这显著提升了工作流程效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
RoomMaster的报告生成功能虽然实用,但仍被认为有待改进。用户希望在创建和导出报告方面获得更高的效率和效果,这表明改进功能可以简化分析任务。
一些用户指出需要改进用户体验,尤其强调需要消除重复性任务,例如频繁登录,这会影响日常使用该软件的流畅性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Ciaobooking 和 roommaster PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Ciaobooking 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster PMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。roommaster PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.1/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Ciaobooking:否。roommaster PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Ciaobooking 的 HT Score 为 0,roommaster 的为 83。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问