The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,389 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 易于使用且设计直观 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Centralized user & role management and Unlimited Channels (no additional cost).
Exely 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) .
在分析了 1,389 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 易于使用且设计直观, 实时同步, 一体化平台集成,而 Exely 用户则强调 channel manager integration and synchronization, 用户界面和可用性, 支持与响应。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且设计直观
▾
|
+
Channel Manager Integration and Synchronization
▾
|
|
+
实时同步
▾
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
+
一体化平台集成
▾
|
+
支持与响应
▾
|
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
+
直接预订增强
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制限制
▾
|
−
分析与报告
▾
|
|
−
速度和性能问题
▾
|
−
自定义和控制
▾
|
|
−
网站建设者限制
▾
|
−
集成灵活性
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 572 条评价 | #15 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 171 条评价 | #9 51 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 42 条评价 | #14 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 4 条评价 | #7 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 484 条评价 | #15 29 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 213 条评价 | #13 27 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 108 条评价 | #15 14 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 92 条评价 | #14 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #1 405 条评价 | #18 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 183 条评价 | #19 10 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 231 条评价 | #5 67 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #6 14 条评价 | #7 13 条评价 |
Choosing a channel manager for your hotel involves balancing ease of use, features, support, and overall value. Both Cloudbeds’ MyAllocator and Exely aim to simplify distribution, but their approaches and strengths differ significantly. Your decision hinges on which product aligns best with your hotel’s size, technology needs, and growth plans.
Cloudbeds’ platform offers a broad suite of integrated tools with a proven track record and a larger user base. Exely, meanwhile, emphasizes straightforward, error-reducing rate management with an ultra-lean interface. Which will serve your hotel better?
Cloudbeds and Exely both solve the core challenge of managing multiple OTAs and reducing overbookings through synchronization. Cloudbeds’s strength lies in its extensive ecosystem, integration options, and comprehensive platform that combines PMS, channel management, and booking engine—making it ideal for hotels seeking an all-in-one solution.
Exely focuses primarily on rate and availability updates with a simple interface, designed to eliminate manual errors quickly. It’s best suited for hotels or chains that want a straightforward, highly reliable channel manager without extra features. Do you need a full platform or a specialized rate management tool?
If your hotel needs a broad, integrated platform that manages operations, distribution, and guest engagement in one place, Cloudbeds is the clear pick. Its larger review base (over 1,062 reviews) and higher recency of feedback mean better support and ongoing improvements.
If your hotel’s priority is error-free, rapid updates across OTAs with minimal fuss—and you don’t require a broader PMS—Exely offers a simpler, more direct experience. It’s perfect for independent hotels and chains that want to streamline distribution without extra bells and whistles.
For multi-property management, extensive integrations, and future scalability, Cloudbeds outshines. For quick, reliable rate updates and overbooking prevention, Exely is a solid choice.
Cloudbeds has a highly regarded interface with a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating, praised for its intuitive design and staff onboarding. Its onboarding score (4.45/5) and review comments highlight a platform that’s accessible to teams at all levels, though some users mention a learning curve with advanced features.
Exely edges out slightly with a 4.95/5 rating, offering a very simple, user-friendly extranet that minimizes training needs. Its minimalistic approach means less complexity during setup and daily operations.
Edge: Exely.
Cloudbeds stands out with 17 unique features, including PMS connectivity, role management, unlimited channels, and yield rules—features that give it a broader operational scope. Its ability to connect with 190 verified partners and offer extensive automation sets it apart.
Exely provides core channel management features, focusing solely on rate and availability updates, with no additional features beyond synchronization and reporting. Its simplicity is an advantage for those seeking straightforward functionality.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support rating (4.41/5) is strong, with reviews emphasizing responsiveness and helpfulness, though some users report occasional delays. Its onboarding process is well-rated (4.45/5), and the company has a large, global support team.
Exely scores a perfect 4.95/5 on support and onboarding, with reviews explicitly praising its responsiveness and ease of problem-solving. Its recent product launch and smaller team enable more personalized, rapid assistance.
Edge: Exely.
Cloudbeds excels with 190 verified partners, offering integrations with PMS, revenue management, marketing, and more. Shared partners like Booking.com and IDeaS ensure robust connectivity, supporting extensive automation.
Exely has only 8 verified partners, mainly OTA platforms like Booking.com and Hotellab, with limited other integrations. Its ecosystem is more focused and less flexible for expanding operational needs.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s 4.64/5 overall rating reflects a broad user base, including independent hotels, hostels, and boutique properties, with recent reviews confirming continued satisfaction. Hotels consistently praise its comprehensive features and ease of scaling.
Exely, with a 85.09/5 HTR score but fewer reviews, has received uniformly positive feedback about its simplicity and reliability—particularly from independent hotels and small chains. However, the limited number of recent reviews reduces confidence in long-term support.
Given the volume and recency, Cloudbeds’s ratings are more representative, making it the stronger choice.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a $200/month base fee, with no freemium or tiered pricing outlined. Its higher cost reflects its broader feature set and extensive integrations.
Exely’s pricing starts at $100/month with no additional fees, making it more affordable for hotels prioritizing fundamental distribution management. Its straightforward pricing structure appeals to smaller operations.
For value that matches your budget and feature needs, Cloudbeds offers more, but Exely’s lower price may suffice for simple use cases.
Not ideal if you prefer a lean, single-function channel manager without additional features, or have a very limited IT support team.
Not ideal if you need a broader platform that manages reservations, guest engagement, or revenue optimization.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, scalable platform that integrates operations, distribution, and guest experience — making it ideal for hotels aiming to grow and optimize across multiple channels. Its larger user base, broader feature set, and extensive integrations make it a top choice for mid-sized and larger hotels seeking efficiency and future-proofing.
Exely’s simplicity, affordability, and focus on error-free rate synchronization suit small hotels or chains that want a straightforward, reliable channel manager. Its ease of use and dedicated support make it a dependable solution for those with limited technical resources.
If your hotel needs a broad, future-ready platform, Cloudbeds is the clear leader. For quick, reliable distribution without extra complexity, Exely offers a strong alternative.
我们分析了 9 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds直观的界面受到许多用户的好评,他们认为该界面对各级员工都非常友好。这一优势缩短了培训时间,提高了操作的一致性,但部分用户仍然认为高级功能导航... Cloudbeds直观的界面受到许多用户的好评,他们认为该界面对各级员工都非常友好。这一优势缩短了培训时间,提高了操作的一致性,但部分用户仍然认为高级功能导航方面还有改进空间。
该平台跨渠道的实时同步功能被誉为一项关键特性。这为用户提供了最新的库存信息,显著减少了超额预订的情况。评论者强调了其在保持OTA和直接预订等平台间信息一... 该平台跨渠道的实时同步功能被誉为一项关键特性。这为用户提供了最新的库存信息,显著减少了超额预订的情况。评论者强调了其在保持OTA和直接预订等平台间信息一致性方面的重要性。
许多用户称赞 Cloudbeds 将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎无缝集成,减少了对多个系统的需求,从而简化了操作。这种集成有助于员工集中高效地管理预订... 许多用户称赞 Cloudbeds 将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎无缝集成,减少了对多个系统的需求,从而简化了操作。这种集成有助于员工集中高效地管理预订、房价和宾客互动,提高工作效率并减少错误。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Cloudbeds 支持基本功能,但其在网站设计、消息传递和报告等方面的自定义选项一直备受诟病。用户希望在定制这些功能方面拥有更大的灵活性和控制权,以便更... 虽然 Cloudbeds 支持基本功能,但其在网站设计、消息传递和报告等方面的自定义选项一直备受诟病。用户希望在定制这些功能方面拥有更大的灵活性和控制权,以便更好地满足特定的业务需求并改善宾客体验。
尽管该平台总体运行良好,但部分用户反映在高峰时段偶尔会出现速度瓶颈和延迟,这会影响工作效率。因此,我们希望在高峰时段加快加载速度并提高系统响应速度。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
The robust integration and synchronization abilities of Exely facilitate smooth channel management with minimal errors. Users commend how effectively... The robust integration and synchronization abilities of Exely facilitate smooth channel management with minimal errors. Users commend how effectively it connects with PMS and OTAs, though some desire improvements in certain PMS integrations.
Exely 的用户友好界面是其一大优势,方便酒店员工管理日常运营。然而,部分用户建议进一步进行定制和现代化改造,以提升用户体验。
Exely 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而备受赞誉,从而确保了服务的可靠性。然而,一些用户建议在高峰时段响应速度可以更快一些。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Exely 提供了重要的绩效洞察,但用户表示需要更详细、可定制的报告选项,以便更好地分析渠道有效性并推动战略决策。
尽管 Exely 为预订规则和促销活动提供了高级自定义选项,但一些用户希望网站模板和报告格式能有更灵活的设计选项。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 和 Exely Channel Manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Channel Manager 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator):否。Exely Channel Manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 99,Exely 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问