Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) vs. Exely Channel Manager: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 July 23, 2026  ·  已分析 1,422 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 1,422 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and centralized operations 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Centralized user & role management and Unlimited Channels (no additional cost).

Exely 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 与 Exely Channel Manager 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 1,422 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
98
87
推荐可能性
91%
98%
易用性
4.6/5
4.9/5
客户支持
4.4/5
5.0/5
性价比
4.3/5
4.9/5
起始价格 From $200/mo From $100/mo
经验证的评价 1,278 144

Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 与 Exely Channel Manager 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 1,422 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 ease of use and centralized operations, channel sync and ota distribution, 报告和分析,而 Exely 用户则强调 channel manager integration and synchronization, 用户界面和可用性, 支持与响应。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Exely Exely
优点
+ Ease of use and centralized operations
+ Channel Manager Integration and Synchronization
+ Channel sync and OTA distribution
+ 用户界面和可用性
+ 报告和分析
+ 支持与响应
+ 培训、入职和学习资源
+ 直接预订增强
缺点
酒店工作流程功能缺失和自定义限制
分析与报告
支持响应速度和服务质量
自定义和控制
付款、发票和财务工作流程
集成灵活性

Cloudbeds 对比 Exely:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Exely Exely
小型(10-24 间客房) #3 572 条评价 #15 26 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #5 171 条评价 #9 51 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #4 42 条评价 #14 5 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #11 4 条评价 #7 5 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Exely Exely
精品酒店 #2 484 条评价 #15 29 条评价
豪华酒店 #4 213 条评价 #13 27 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #4 108 条评价 #15 14 条评价
长住酒店 #2 92 条评价 #14 6 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Exely Exely
北美 #1 405 条评价 #18 2 条评价
欧洲 #4 183 条评价 #19 10 条评价
亚太 #4 231 条评价 #5 67 条评价
中东 #6 14 条评价 #7 13 条评价

The Decision

Choosing a channel manager for your hotel involves balancing ease of use, features, support, and overall value. Both Cloudbeds’ MyAllocator and Exely aim to simplify distribution, but their approaches and strengths differ significantly. Your decision hinges on which product aligns best with your hotel’s size, technology needs, and growth plans.

Cloudbeds’ platform offers a broad suite of integrated tools with a proven track record and a larger user base. Exely, meanwhile, emphasizes straightforward, error-reducing rate management with an ultra-lean interface. Which will serve your hotel better?

Is Cloudbeds or Exely Better for Hotels?

Cloudbeds and Exely both solve the core challenge of managing multiple OTAs and reducing overbookings through synchronization. Cloudbeds’s strength lies in its extensive ecosystem, integration options, and comprehensive platform that combines PMS, channel management, and booking engine—making it ideal for hotels seeking an all-in-one solution.

Exely focuses primarily on rate and availability updates with a simple interface, designed to eliminate manual errors quickly. It’s best suited for hotels or chains that want a straightforward, highly reliable channel manager without extra features. Do you need a full platform or a specialized rate management tool?

Cloudbeds vs Exely: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a broad, integrated platform that manages operations, distribution, and guest engagement in one place, Cloudbeds is the clear pick. Its larger review base (over 1,062 reviews) and higher recency of feedback mean better support and ongoing improvements.

If your hotel’s priority is error-free, rapid updates across OTAs with minimal fuss—and you don’t require a broader PMS—Exely offers a simpler, more direct experience. It’s perfect for independent hotels and chains that want to streamline distribution without extra bells and whistles.

For multi-property management, extensive integrations, and future scalability, Cloudbeds outshines. For quick, reliable rate updates and overbooking prevention, Exely is a solid choice.

Is Cloudbeds or Exely Easier to Use?

Cloudbeds has a highly regarded interface with a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating, praised for its intuitive design and staff onboarding. Its onboarding score (4.45/5) and review comments highlight a platform that’s accessible to teams at all levels, though some users mention a learning curve with advanced features.

Exely edges out slightly with a 4.95/5 rating, offering a very simple, user-friendly extranet that minimizes training needs. Its minimalistic approach means less complexity during setup and daily operations.

Edge: Exely.

Which Has Better Features: Cloudbeds or Exely?

Cloudbeds stands out with 17 unique features, including PMS connectivity, role management, unlimited channels, and yield rules—features that give it a broader operational scope. Its ability to connect with 190 verified partners and offer extensive automation sets it apart.

Exely provides core channel management features, focusing solely on rate and availability updates, with no additional features beyond synchronization and reporting. Its simplicity is an advantage for those seeking straightforward functionality.

Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Cloudbeds or Exely?

Cloudbeds’s support rating (4.41/5) is strong, with reviews emphasizing responsiveness and helpfulness, though some users report occasional delays. Its onboarding process is well-rated (4.45/5), and the company has a large, global support team.

Exely scores a perfect 4.95/5 on support and onboarding, with reviews explicitly praising its responsiveness and ease of problem-solving. Its recent product launch and smaller team enable more personalized, rapid assistance.

Edge: Exely.

Which Has More Integrations: Cloudbeds or Exely?

Cloudbeds excels with 190 verified partners, offering integrations with PMS, revenue management, marketing, and more. Shared partners like Booking.com and IDeaS ensure robust connectivity, supporting extensive automation.

Exely has only 8 verified partners, mainly OTA platforms like Booking.com and Hotellab, with limited other integrations. Its ecosystem is more focused and less flexible for expanding operational needs.

Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Cloudbeds or Exely?

Cloudbeds’s 4.64/5 overall rating reflects a broad user base, including independent hotels, hostels, and boutique properties, with recent reviews confirming continued satisfaction. Hotels consistently praise its comprehensive features and ease of scaling.

Exely, with a 85.09/5 HTR score but fewer reviews, has received uniformly positive feedback about its simplicity and reliability—particularly from independent hotels and small chains. However, the limited number of recent reviews reduces confidence in long-term support.

Given the volume and recency, Cloudbeds’s ratings are more representative, making it the stronger choice.

Edge: Cloudbeds.

How Much Do Cloudbeds and Exely Cost?

Cloudbeds charges a $200/month base fee, with no freemium or tiered pricing outlined. Its higher cost reflects its broader feature set and extensive integrations.

Exely’s pricing starts at $100/month with no additional fees, making it more affordable for hotels prioritizing fundamental distribution management. Its straightforward pricing structure appeals to smaller operations.

For value that matches your budget and feature needs, Cloudbeds offers more, but Exely’s lower price may suffice for simple use cases.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Cloudbeds?

  • Hotels seeking an all-in-one platform with PMS, booking engine, and channel management.
  • Properties with multiple locations or growing portfolios.
  • Hotels that want advanced automation and detailed reporting.
  • Teams that need flexible integrations with third-party systems.
  • Hotels aiming for operational scalability and guest experience improvements.

Not ideal if you prefer a lean, single-function channel manager without additional features, or have a very limited IT support team.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Exely?

  • Independent hotels or small chains focusing solely on distribution.
  • Hotels that prefer a simple, fast rate update process.
  • Properties that want to avoid complexity and minimize training.
  • Hotels with existing systems and need a reliable, straightforward channel manager.
  • Hotels looking to eliminate overbooking and manual errors across online channels.

Not ideal if you need a broader platform that manages reservations, guest engagement, or revenue optimization.

Exely vs Cloudbeds: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, scalable platform that integrates operations, distribution, and guest experience — making it ideal for hotels aiming to grow and optimize across multiple channels. Its larger user base, broader feature set, and extensive integrations make it a top choice for mid-sized and larger hotels seeking efficiency and future-proofing.

Exely’s simplicity, affordability, and focus on error-free rate synchronization suit small hotels or chains that want a straightforward, reliable channel manager. Its ease of use and dedicated support make it a dependable solution for those with limited technical resources.

If your hotel needs a broad, future-ready platform, Cloudbeds is the clear leader. For quick, reliable distribution without extra complexity, Exely offers a strong alternative.

Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 和 Exely Channel Manager 的价格是多少?

渠道经理 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Exely Exely
Starting Price From $200/mo From $100/mo

功能对比:Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 与 Exely Channel Manager

这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。

功能 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Exely Exely
费率管理
100%
100%
支持每周和每月费率
收益规则
派生费率
库存管理
库存网格
房间类型映射
100%
100%
通道自映射
自动化与同步
100%
100%
批量更新和多重限制
2路实时集成
PMS 连接性
管理和设置
100%
100%
多种语言
集中的用户和角色管理
多币种支持
库存网格
综合支付处理
分析和报告
100%
100%
分析仪表板
预订绩效和进度报告
Other
100%
0%
无限频道(无需额外费用)

实际成果:Cloudbeds 对比 Exely(按业务目标)

我们分析了 10 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Cloudbeds Himmapana Villas 中型
+ Growth in direct bookings: the combination of a strong social media presence and an effective online booking and payment system has led to a significant increase in direct bookings.
+ Operational efficiency: the adoption of a simple yet effective hotel management system has streamlined day-to-day operations, efficiently handling over 2,000 bookings annually, including special guest requests.
+ Remote management flexibility: the use of a cloud-based platform allows for the convenient remote management of the property, enabling operations to be handled effectively both on-site and during travel.

"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."

Thomas K. Petersen
Thomas K. Petersen
Managing Partner
Exely Savoy Westend Hotel 大型
+ Direct bookings doubled after implementation of Exely Solutions.
+ Website conversion rate increased from 1.7% to 3.5%, meaning nearly twice as many visitors completed bookings.
+ �s official website became the #1 sales channel, consistently outperforming all OTA channels in revenue.

"Before Exely, we could not get enough flexibility or functionality we needed. We couldn’t manage dynamic pricing or promotions properly, now the system provides us all the tools t..."

M
Ms. Ada
Deputy Manager/Sales & Marketing Directo...
提高运营效率
Cloudbeds Flor Parks 小型
+ 17% increase in online reviews
+ 11% of monthly bookings from Google Free Listings
+ Fully integrated booking engine & channel manager

"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."

V
Victor Menor
Operations Manager
Exely Boulevard Batumi Hotel & Bellevue Residence 中型
+ 15% of total online bookings now come from the hotel
+ �s own website.
+ Availability and pricing are now consistently synced across all OTA channels.

"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."

N
Nino Motskobili
Head of Data Operations
改善宾客体验
Cloudbeds The Pad Silverthorne 小型
+ 60% direct bookings in year one
+ 95% guest rating with 1000+ reviews
+ High OTA click-through rates, with lower cancellation rates

"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."

Kevin Bowen
Kevin Bowen
Director of Operations
Exely Exely

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Cloudbeds 对比 Exely:总结

Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds
4.6/5 来自 1,278 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

Ease of use and centralized operations 94% 正面

Reviewers frequently highlight Cloudbeds as intuitive, easy to learn, and practical for day-to-day hotel work. They value having PMS, reservations, ch... Reviewers frequently highlight Cloudbeds as intuitive, easy to learn, and practical for day-to-day hotel work. They value having PMS, reservations, channel management, and related tasks in one workflow, which saves time and reduces operational complexity.

Channel sync and OTA distribution 88% 正面

Users most often say Cloudbeds keeps inventory, rates, and bookings synchronized across OTAs in real time, cutting double-bookings and manual updates.... Users most often say Cloudbeds keeps inventory, rates, and bookings synchronized across OTAs in real time, cutting double-bookings and manual updates. Many describe it as a dependable way to manage distribution from one place and improve occupancy control.

报告和分析 73% 正面

许多用户称赞该报告系统能够清晰展现入住率、收入、对比数据和运营绩效,帮助管理层做出更明智的决策。与此同时,也有不少用户希望系统能够提供更深层次的自定义... 许多用户称赞该报告系统能够清晰展现入住率、收入、对比数据和运营绩效,帮助管理层做出更明智的决策。与此同时,也有不少用户希望系统能够提供更深层次的自定义选项、更便捷的导出功能以及更详细的财务信息。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

酒店工作流程功能缺失和自定义限制 91% 负面

评论者指出,Cloudbeds在高级运营流程方面存在不足,例如分次入住、房间调换、候补名单、房间状态控制、团体预订管理以及可编辑的备注或预订信息。这些评论表明... 评论者指出,Cloudbeds在高级运营流程方面存在不足,例如分次入住、房间调换、候补名单、房间状态控制、团体预订管理以及可编辑的备注或预订信息。这些评论表明,Cloudbeds在核心分销方面表现出色,但对于一些酒店而言,在复杂的酒店运营方面,它需要更大的灵活性。

支持响应速度和服务质量 58% 负面

一些评论者称赞其快速、专业的支持和有效的实施协助,尤其是在系统上线初期。另一些评论者则强烈批评上线后的支持速度缓慢或难以联系,认为系统故障或同步问题导... 一些评论者称赞其快速、专业的支持和有效的实施协助,尤其是在系统上线初期。另一些评论者则强烈批评上线后的支持速度缓慢或难以联系,认为系统故障或同步问题导致的延迟会损害客户服务和收入。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #4 vs #14
中型(25-74 间客房) #5 vs #9
小型(10-24 间客房) #3 vs #15
超小型(少于 10 间客房) #1 vs #21

独特功能

集中的用户和角色管理 无限频道(无需额外费用)
4.6/5 易用性 4.4/5 客户支持 199 个集成
访问官网
Exely
Exely
4.9/5 来自 144 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

Channel Manager Integration and Synchronization 85% 正面

The robust integration and synchronization abilities of Exely facilitate smooth channel management with minimal errors. Users commend how effectively... The robust integration and synchronization abilities of Exely facilitate smooth channel management with minimal errors. Users commend how effectively it connects with PMS and OTAs, though some desire improvements in certain PMS integrations.

用户界面和可用性 95% 正面

Exely 的用户友好界面是其一大优势,方便酒店员工管理日常运营。然而,部分用户建议进一步进行定制和现代化改造,以提升用户体验。

支持与响应 87% 正面

Exely 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而备受赞誉,从而确保了服务的可靠性。然而,一些用户建议在高峰时段响应速度可以更快一些。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

分析与报告 77% 负面

虽然 Exely 提供了重要的绩效洞察,但用户表示需要更详细、可定制的报告选项,以便更好地分析渠道有效性并推动战略决策。

自定义和控制 73% 负面

尽管 Exely 为预订规则和促销活动提供了高级自定义选项,但一些用户希望网站模板和报告格式能有更灵活的设计选项。

排名更高的方面

超大型(200+ 间客房) #7 vs #11
BG #1 vs #3
GE #1 vs #6
TR #4 vs #7
4.9/5 易用性 4.9/5 客户支持 8 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Cloudbeds 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
易用性 Exely 4.9 vs 4.6 (+0.3)
客户支持 Exely 4.9 vs 4.4 (+0.5)
性价比 Exely 4.9 vs 4.3 (+0.6)
入职培训 Exely 4.9 vs 4.4 (+0.4)

关于 Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 与 Exely Channel Manager 的常见问题

Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 能否替代 Exely Channel Manager?

这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 和 Exely Channel Manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 提供 199 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Channel Manager 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 或 Exely Channel Manager 是否提供免费方案?

Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator):否。Exely Channel Manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 和 Exely Channel Manager?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 98,Exely 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取您的免费人工智能分析师报告

根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案

Ghostel icon
值得信赖
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

让我们查找您的酒店信息