The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Hotelgest |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Hotelgest |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Hotelgest |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and Hotelgest hinges on your hotel’s size, operational needs, and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, well-rated platform with extensive features and a proven track record, whereas Hotelgest remains a lesser-known, less-reviewed option with limited information and no recent user feedback. Given the clear difference in market presence, reviews, and feature depth, Cloudbeds emerges as the stronger candidate for most hotels.
Both Cloudbeds and Hotelgest aim to streamline hotel operations, manage reservations, and improve guest satisfaction. Cloudbeds’s platform is built to serve a broad spectrum of properties, from boutique hotels to large resorts, with over 1,071 reviews and a 4.63/5 overall rating. Hotelgest, with no recent reviews or ratings, lacks the user validation that supports Cloudbeds’s reliability. Do you want a trusted, battle-tested system backed by extensive feedback?
Cloudbeds’s strengths lie in its integration capabilities, ease of use, and comprehensive feature set. Hotelgest's offerings are less documented, and its lack of recent reviews makes it difficult to assess its performance or customer satisfaction. If you need a proven solution with ongoing support, Cloudbeds’s recent reviews and high NPS score of 8.94/10 make it the clear choice. Are you comfortable relying on a system with little recent feedback?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich property management system that supports multi-channel distribution, revenue management, and guest engagement, go with Cloudbeds. Its extensive third-party integrations, mobile app, and automation tools suit properties looking to grow and modernize efficiently. Conversely, if your hotel has very limited operational complexity and prefers a simple, possibly budget-friendly solution without a strong market presence, Hotelgest might be considered, though its lack of recent validation is a concern. Would your team benefit from a proven platform with broad industry acceptance?
Cloudbeds boasts a 4.61/5 ease-of-use rating based on over 1,000 recent reviews, with many praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users frequently comment on how quickly staff can adopt Cloudbeds, with some calling its system “easy to manage across multiple platforms” and “the end of guesswork.” Hotelgest’s usability and onboarding experience are unverified due to the absence of recent reviews and ratings, making it impossible to confidently assess its user-friendliness. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 64 distinct features, including channel management, online booking engine, guest profiles, automated night audit, and revenue management modules—many of which are absent or unverified in Hotelgest. Its features are designed to support scalability, automation, and guest engagement, making it suitable for properties seeking comprehensive management. Hotelgest’s limited publicly available information prevents a fair comparison, but the absence of detailed features suggests it lacks the breadth Cloudbeds provides. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support team is highly rated at 4.41/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness—many users say support “responds promptly” and “goes the extra mile.” Hotelgest’s support and onboarding ratings are unavailable, and without recent user feedback, we cannot confirm its support quality. Given Cloudbeds’s proven support record and positive reviews, it remains the safer choice for reliable assistance. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds integrates with over 190 verified partners, including major OTAs like Booking.com and Expedia, as well as payment gateways, channel managers, and third-party apps. This extensive network streamlines operations and enhances scalability. Hotelgest has no verified integrations listed, limiting its connectivity and flexibility. If seamless integration and expanding your tech stack matter, Cloudbeds’s marketplace is far more developed. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s recent reviews consistently highlight high satisfaction, with a 4.63/5 rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend. Its user base spans boutique hotels, hostels, and small chains, with many praising its simplicity and support. Hotelgest lacks recent reviews and ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. For properties valuing peer feedback and proven performance, Cloudbeds’s rating and recent reviews support its superior reputation. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a base fee of $600 per month, with no free tier or explicit trial. Hotelgest’s pricing details are not publicly available, making direct comparison difficult. Given Cloudbeds’s transparent pricing and clear value proposition backed by extensive features, it offers predictable costs for planning. Without pricing transparency for Hotelgest, budget-conscious properties may find Cloudbeds’s investment justified by its proven return and support. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Not ideal if your property has minimal complexity or prefers a simple spreadsheet-based approach. Cloudbeds suits growing and mid-sized properties ready to leverage automation and data-driven decisions.
Given the lack of recent validation, Hotelgest may be suitable for very small or budget-constrained hotels, but it falls short for those seeking proven scalability and support.
Cloudbeds is a well-established, highly-rated property management platform trusted worldwide, offering a suite of features designed for scalable hotel operations. Its extensive integrations, ease of use, and recent reviews make it the clear choice for hotels looking to grow efficiently and confidently.
Choose Cloudbeds if you want a comprehensive, proven system that supports your expansion, improves operational efficiency, and enhances guest experiences through automation. Its high customer satisfaction and ongoing innovation make it an indispensable tool for modern hoteliers.
Opt for Hotelgest only if your hotel’s needs are minimal, you’re budget-limited, and you prioritize a simple, perhaps less proven solution. Its lack of recent reviews and limited feature transparency suggest it’s not suitable for properties planning to scale or seeking robust support.
In conclusion, Cloudbeds’s extensive adoption, recent positive feedback, and feature depth position it as the best option for most hotels ready to elevate their operations. Hotelgest remains a less validated alternative with uncertain support and functionality, making it less advisable for ambitious properties.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Hotelgest 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hotelgest 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。Hotelgest:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Hotelgest 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问