项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 2,068 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 培训、易用性和入职 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的住宿设施 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Centralized Messaging.
Oracle Hospitality 表现出色 在 云集成和移动性 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (4.2/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 2,068 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $600/月 | 起价 $700/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,307 | 761 |
在分析了 2,068 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 培训、易用性和入职, 支持响应能力和人工协助, 日历和预订可见性,而 Oracle Hospitality 用户则强调 云集成和移动性, 定制化和灵活性, 与第三方系统集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
培训、易用性和入职
▾
|
+
云集成和移动性
▾
|
|
+
支持响应能力和人工协助
▾
|
+
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
+
日历和预订可见性
▾
|
+
与第三方系统集成
▾
|
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
+
预订和入住管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
账单、发票和账单处理
▾
|
−
系统复杂性和学习曲线
▾
|
|
−
移动应用限制
▾
|
−
运营中断和维护
▾
|
|
−
成本问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #17 63 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #2 334 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | #1 252 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #13 4 条评价 | #1 91 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #4 242 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #1 477 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #1 342 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #6 35 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #9 97 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | #4 192 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | #2 398 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | #2 17 条评价 |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS by Cloudbeds and Oracle OPERA PMS by Oracle Hospitality hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and increase revenue, but they diverge significantly in scope, user experience, and target clientele. Your decision should align with your property’s current needs and future plans—are you prioritizing ease of use and affordability or comprehensive enterprise features?
Cloudbeds offers a user-friendly, all-in-one platform favored by small to mid-sized properties, while Oracle's OPERA PMS caters to larger, multi-property hotels seeking extensive customization and integration. Do you want a streamlined system for rapid deployment or a deeply customizable enterprise solution?
Cloudbeds and Oracle OPERA both address core hotel management needs, like reservations, check-in/out, and distribution. Cloudbeds emphasizes simplicity, integration, and scalability for independent hotels, boutique properties, and hostels, while Oracle focuses on large, multi-property operations with complex workflows and extensive automation.
Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive interface and fast onboarding, making it ideal for small teams seeking quick setup and minimal training. Oracle, however, offers advanced features like revenue management, event management, and deep third-party integrations, suited for properties with dedicated tech teams. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s size and tech readiness?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, all-in-one PMS that reduces manual work and accelerates growth, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its 1071 reviews with a 4.63/5 overall rating and recent positive feedback highlight its user-friendliness and value for money, especially for independent and boutique hotels, hostels, and vacation rentals.
If you operate a large chain or a property with complex operations requiring extensive customization, Oracle OPERA offers the scalability and depth you need. Its 696 reviews and 4.18/5 rating reflect a system trusted by global hotel brands, though it demands more investment in training and support. For properties prioritizing enterprise features and advanced analytics, Oracle is the better fit.
Cloudbeds scores a 4.61/5 for ease of use, with reviews commending its straightforward interface and quick learning curve. Users frequently mention that their staff can manage reservations, housekeeping, and reporting with minimal training, often praising the platform's mobile accessibility.
Oracle OPERA also earns a high 4.57/5 in usability, with users appreciating its intuitive dashboards and flexible workflows. However, the extensive features and customization options can introduce a steeper learning curve, especially for smaller teams or less tech-savvy staff.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds provides 51 shared features plus 13 exclusive tools like native email marketing, guest messaging, inventory management, and a wellness module. These features simplify day-to-day operations and support revenue growth, especially for independent properties.
Oracle offers 51 shared features but also includes 6 unique functionalities like multi-currency, guest CRM, and advanced revenue management. Its modules for event management and detailed guest profiles cater to larger hotel groups with complex needs.
Edge: Cloudbeds, for its broader suite of user-centric features tailored for smaller to mid-sized hotels and properties looking for an all-in-one solution.
Cloudbeds garners a 4.41/5 support rating, with reviewers praising its responsive, friendly, and proactive customer service. Many mention that support played a crucial role in onboarding and resolving issues swiftly, often highlighting the availability of support outside traditional hours.
Oracle’s support is rated at 4.25/5, with users noting that support is generally reliable but sometimes delayed during peak times. Some mention that onboarding and support responsiveness can vary, especially in complex implementations.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including popular names like Booking.com, Expedia, QuickBooks, and Mailchimp. Its native integrations with channel managers, payment gateways, and marketing tools are well-regarded, facilitating streamlined workflows.
Oracle OPERA, with 391 verified partners, offers extensive third-party integration options, including critical enterprise solutions like POS, analytics, and F&B systems. Its open API allows deep customization but can require more technical support for setup.
Edge: Oracle, for its wider array of integrations suitable for large, complex hotel operations.
Cloudbeds maintains a 4.63/5 overall rating from 1071 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use and tangible results like increased direct bookings. Independent hotels, hostels, and boutique operators consistently praise its simplicity and support.
Oracle, with 696 reviews and a 4.18/5 rating, is favored by larger properties and chains for its comprehensive capabilities, though some users note that its complexity can hinder quick adoption. Large hotel groups appreciate its scalability and enterprise features.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ pricing starts at $600/month, with no freemium or trial options, positioning it as an affordable choice for SMEs. Oracle OPERA’s base cost begins at $700/month, with additional charges for implementation and customization, reflecting its enterprise-grade capabilities.
Both systems typically involve additional costs for integrations, training, and support, but Cloudbeds’s transparent pricing appeals to smaller properties seeking predictable expenses.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds stands out as a user-friendly, cost-effective PMS tailored for independent, boutique, and small-to-mid-sized properties. Its strengths lie in rapid deployment, ease of use, and a broad feature set that supports growth without overwhelming staff.
Oracle OPERA is best suited for large hotels or chains that need a highly customizable, enterprise-grade system. Its extensive integrations and capabilities serve complex operations but require a bigger investment in time and resources.
Choose Cloudbeds if your priorities are simplicity, speed, and value, especially if you’re growing or managing smaller properties. Opt for Oracle if your hotel demands advanced features, scalability, and integration at a larger operational scale.
In summary, for most small to mid-sized hoteliers seeking a reliable, easy-to-implement property management system, Cloudbeds is the stronger choice. Its recent reviews and higher overall ratings confirm it as the more trusted and agile option to support your hotel’s success.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $600/月 | 起价 $700/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 16 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
"In many aspects, candidly, the ability to offload IT responsibilities to a reliable partner was a driving motivator in our decision to embrace OPERA Cloud."
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"If you’ve used OPERA Cloud and have familiarity with Oracle processes, learning how to use Distribution is almost effortless. And when there was something we didn’t know how to do,..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
"As general manager of Starling Hotel Residence Geneva – a 93-room property in Switzerland’s epicenter – I initially just wanted a system that would be reliable and allow staff to t..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 常被描述为直观且易于学习,这减少了新员工的培训时间,并帮助酒店快速采用系统。评论者也重视教程、大学资源和入职帮助,尽管一些人要求重新培训或获... Cloudbeds 常被描述为直观且易于学习,这减少了新员工的培训时间,并帮助酒店快速采用系统。评论者也重视教程、大学资源和入职帮助,尽管一些人要求重新培训或获得更深入的高级功能指导。
支持是一个主要主题,许多用户赞扬在能够联系到人工时获得的快速帮助和知识丰富的客服。最常见的抱怨是依赖聊天机器人/电子邮件工作流程以及缓慢的升级处理,这... 支持是一个主要主题,许多用户赞扬在能够联系到人工时获得的快速帮助和知识丰富的客服。最常见的抱怨是依赖聊天机器人/电子邮件工作流程以及缓慢的升级处理,这对于可能影响客人体验和收入的紧急前台问题来说是有问题的。
用户反复表示 Cloudbeds 的日历是产品中最清晰的部分,为前台团队提供快速查看入住情况、房型、预订状态和每日预订的功能。它帮助酒店更高效地管理入住、退房、... 用户反复表示 Cloudbeds 的日历是产品中最清晰的部分,为前台团队提供快速查看入住情况、房型、预订状态和每日预订的功能。它帮助酒店更高效地管理入住、退房、拆分住宿和房间变更,减少繁忙操作中的错误。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
审阅者经常提到发票模板、收据、账单审核以及集中式客人账单对于日常运营和客人退房的帮助。同时,添加额外项目的账单流程可能操作繁琐,一些用户希望在Cloudbed... 审阅者经常提到发票模板、收据、账单审核以及集中式客人账单对于日常运营和客人退房的帮助。同时,添加额外项目的账单流程可能操作繁琐,一些用户希望在Cloudbeds中拥有更强的税务、货币和会计处理功能,而不是使用单独的系统。
一个常见的批评是移动应用缺乏足够的操作深度,无法满足移动工作人员的需求。评论者希望在应用中直接进行预订创建、可用性管理、通知、日历访问等操作,而无需切... 一个常见的批评是移动应用缺乏足够的操作深度,无法满足移动工作人员的需求。评论者希望在应用中直接进行预订创建、可用性管理、通知、日历访问等操作,而无需切换到电子邮件或桌面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Opera PMS 的云端特性支持远程访问,减轻了 IT 负担,并实现了多物业管理。用户对其基于互联网的功能表示赞赏,认为其增强了可访问性和可扩展性。然而,也有一些... Opera PMS 的云端特性支持远程访问,减轻了 IT 负担,并实现了多物业管理。用户对其基于互联网的功能表示赞赏,认为其增强了可访问性和可扩展性。然而,也有一些用户担心,由于依赖互联网,运营可能会出现中断。
用户非常欣赏 Opera PMS 灵活的系统配置,它允许自定义以满足独特的运营需求。然而,它存在数据准确性问题,例如创建重复的配置文件。
Opera PMS 能够与第三方系统(例如 POS 系统和分析系统)集成,从而统一酒店运营。一些用户强调了这项功能,它显著提高了运营效率,但也有人指出集成过程可能比... Opera PMS 能够与第三方系统(例如 POS 系统和分析系统)集成,从而统一酒店运营。一些用户强调了这项功能,它显著提高了运营效率,但也有人指出集成过程可能比较繁琐。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
Opera PMS 虽然功能丰富,但操作起来却比较复杂,新用户学习起来难度较大。培训和上手需要耗费大量时间,小型酒店可能会觉得定制和设置工作繁琐繁琐。
尽管 Opera PMS 具有基于云的优势,但它可能会在维护期间或由于互联网问题而出现运行中断,从而影响服务连续性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Oracle OPERA PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 199 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Oracle OPERA PMS 提供 390 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。Oracle OPERA PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Oracle Hospitality 的为 90。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐