The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 2,003 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Centralized Messaging.
Oracle Hospitality 表现出色 在 云集成和移动性 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.2/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 2,003 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $700/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,242 | 761 |
在分析了 2,003 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统,而 Oracle Hospitality 用户则强调 云集成和移动性, 定制化和灵活性, 与第三方系统集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
云集成和移动性
▾
|
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
+
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
+
与第三方系统集成
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
+
预订和入住管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
−
系统复杂性和学习曲线
▾
|
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
−
运营中断和维护
▾
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
−
成本问题
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #17 63 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #2 334 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | #1 252 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #13 4 条评价 | #1 91 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #4 242 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #1 477 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #1 342 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #6 35 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #9 97 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | #4 192 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | #2 398 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | #2 17 条评价 |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS by Cloudbeds and Oracle OPERA PMS by Oracle Hospitality hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and increase revenue, but they diverge significantly in scope, user experience, and target clientele. Your decision should align with your property’s current needs and future plans—are you prioritizing ease of use and affordability or comprehensive enterprise features?
Cloudbeds offers a user-friendly, all-in-one platform favored by small to mid-sized properties, while Oracle's OPERA PMS caters to larger, multi-property hotels seeking extensive customization and integration. Do you want a streamlined system for rapid deployment or a deeply customizable enterprise solution?
Cloudbeds and Oracle OPERA both address core hotel management needs, like reservations, check-in/out, and distribution. Cloudbeds emphasizes simplicity, integration, and scalability for independent hotels, boutique properties, and hostels, while Oracle focuses on large, multi-property operations with complex workflows and extensive automation.
Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive interface and fast onboarding, making it ideal for small teams seeking quick setup and minimal training. Oracle, however, offers advanced features like revenue management, event management, and deep third-party integrations, suited for properties with dedicated tech teams. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s size and tech readiness?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, all-in-one PMS that reduces manual work and accelerates growth, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its 1071 reviews with a 4.63/5 overall rating and recent positive feedback highlight its user-friendliness and value for money, especially for independent and boutique hotels, hostels, and vacation rentals.
If you operate a large chain or a property with complex operations requiring extensive customization, Oracle OPERA offers the scalability and depth you need. Its 696 reviews and 4.18/5 rating reflect a system trusted by global hotel brands, though it demands more investment in training and support. For properties prioritizing enterprise features and advanced analytics, Oracle is the better fit.
Cloudbeds scores a 4.61/5 for ease of use, with reviews commending its straightforward interface and quick learning curve. Users frequently mention that their staff can manage reservations, housekeeping, and reporting with minimal training, often praising the platform's mobile accessibility.
Oracle OPERA also earns a high 4.57/5 in usability, with users appreciating its intuitive dashboards and flexible workflows. However, the extensive features and customization options can introduce a steeper learning curve, especially for smaller teams or less tech-savvy staff.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds provides 51 shared features plus 13 exclusive tools like native email marketing, guest messaging, inventory management, and a wellness module. These features simplify day-to-day operations and support revenue growth, especially for independent properties.
Oracle offers 51 shared features but also includes 6 unique functionalities like multi-currency, guest CRM, and advanced revenue management. Its modules for event management and detailed guest profiles cater to larger hotel groups with complex needs.
Edge: Cloudbeds, for its broader suite of user-centric features tailored for smaller to mid-sized hotels and properties looking for an all-in-one solution.
Cloudbeds garners a 4.41/5 support rating, with reviewers praising its responsive, friendly, and proactive customer service. Many mention that support played a crucial role in onboarding and resolving issues swiftly, often highlighting the availability of support outside traditional hours.
Oracle’s support is rated at 4.25/5, with users noting that support is generally reliable but sometimes delayed during peak times. Some mention that onboarding and support responsiveness can vary, especially in complex implementations.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including popular names like Booking.com, Expedia, QuickBooks, and Mailchimp. Its native integrations with channel managers, payment gateways, and marketing tools are well-regarded, facilitating streamlined workflows.
Oracle OPERA, with 391 verified partners, offers extensive third-party integration options, including critical enterprise solutions like POS, analytics, and F&B systems. Its open API allows deep customization but can require more technical support for setup.
Edge: Oracle, for its wider array of integrations suitable for large, complex hotel operations.
Cloudbeds maintains a 4.63/5 overall rating from 1071 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use and tangible results like increased direct bookings. Independent hotels, hostels, and boutique operators consistently praise its simplicity and support.
Oracle, with 696 reviews and a 4.18/5 rating, is favored by larger properties and chains for its comprehensive capabilities, though some users note that its complexity can hinder quick adoption. Large hotel groups appreciate its scalability and enterprise features.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ pricing starts at $600/month, with no freemium or trial options, positioning it as an affordable choice for SMEs. Oracle OPERA’s base cost begins at $700/month, with additional charges for implementation and customization, reflecting its enterprise-grade capabilities.
Both systems typically involve additional costs for integrations, training, and support, but Cloudbeds’s transparent pricing appeals to smaller properties seeking predictable expenses.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds stands out as a user-friendly, cost-effective PMS tailored for independent, boutique, and small-to-mid-sized properties. Its strengths lie in rapid deployment, ease of use, and a broad feature set that supports growth without overwhelming staff.
Oracle OPERA is best suited for large hotels or chains that need a highly customizable, enterprise-grade system. Its extensive integrations and capabilities serve complex operations but require a bigger investment in time and resources.
Choose Cloudbeds if your priorities are simplicity, speed, and value, especially if you’re growing or managing smaller properties. Opt for Oracle if your hotel demands advanced features, scalability, and integration at a larger operational scale.
In summary, for most small to mid-sized hoteliers seeking a reliable, easy-to-implement property management system, Cloudbeds is the stronger choice. Its recent reviews and higher overall ratings confirm it as the more trusted and agile option to support your hotel’s success.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $700/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds PMS 和 Oracle OPERA PMS 共享 51 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 无限频道(无需额外费用) | ||
| 礼品券和预付体验 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 16 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
"In many aspects, candidly, the ability to offload IT responsibilities to a reliable partner was a driving motivator in our decision to embrace OPERA Cloud."
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"If you’ve used OPERA Cloud and have familiarity with Oracle processes, learning how to use Distribution is almost effortless. And when there was something we didn’t know how to do,..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
"As general manager of Starling Hotel Residence Geneva – a 93-room property in Switzerland’s epicenter – I initially just wanted a system that would be reliable and allow staff to t..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Opera PMS 的云端特性支持远程访问,减轻了 IT 负担,并实现了多物业管理。用户对其基于互联网的功能表示赞赏,认为其增强了可访问性和可扩展性。然而,也有一些... Opera PMS 的云端特性支持远程访问,减轻了 IT 负担,并实现了多物业管理。用户对其基于互联网的功能表示赞赏,认为其增强了可访问性和可扩展性。然而,也有一些用户担心,由于依赖互联网,运营可能会出现中断。
用户非常欣赏 Opera PMS 灵活的系统配置,它允许自定义以满足独特的运营需求。然而,它存在数据准确性问题,例如创建重复的配置文件。
Opera PMS 能够与第三方系统(例如 POS 系统和分析系统)集成,从而统一酒店运营。一些用户强调了这项功能,它显著提高了运营效率,但也有人指出集成过程可能比... Opera PMS 能够与第三方系统(例如 POS 系统和分析系统)集成,从而统一酒店运营。一些用户强调了这项功能,它显著提高了运营效率,但也有人指出集成过程可能比较繁琐。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Opera PMS 虽然功能丰富,但操作起来却比较复杂,新用户学习起来难度较大。培训和上手需要耗费大量时间,小型酒店可能会觉得定制和设置工作繁琐繁琐。
尽管 Opera PMS 具有基于云的优势,但它可能会在维护期间或由于互联网问题而出现运行中断,从而影响服务连续性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Oracle OPERA PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Oracle OPERA PMS 提供 391 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。Oracle OPERA PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Oracle Hospitality 的为 93。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问