The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #78 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #77 0 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #52 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #62 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | — |
As you evaluate property management systems, Cloudbeds PMS and Roomsy stand out for very different reasons. Cloudbeds dominates with a proven track record, extensive features, and a broad hotel segment reach, while Roomsy offers a simpler, more streamlined approach for smaller operations. With Cloudbeds garnering over 1,000 recent reviews and a top HT rate, it’s clear that your team’s experience aligns more with its capabilities. So, which system truly fits your hotel’s needs?
Both Cloudbeds and Roomsy aim to streamline hotel operations, but they do so with different levels of depth. Cloudbeds offers a full suite of 64 proprietary features, including channel management, revenue tools, and advanced analytics, making it suitable for properties with complex needs. Roomsy, on the other hand, provides core management functions, focusing on ease of use and reliability for smaller properties.
Cloudbeds’s user ratings are significantly higher, with a 4.63/5 overall and more recent reviews, compared to Roomsy’s lack of publicly available ratings or reviews. This suggests that your team will find more consistent support, updates, and proven functionality with Cloudbeds. Are you prepared for a more comprehensive platform that can scale, or do you prefer a straightforward, easy-to-operate system?
If your hotel needs a versatile, scalable platform with extensive integrations, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its broad feature set and large partner network (190 verified partners) support complex operations, multi-property management, and growth ambitions.
If your hotel prioritizes simplicity and quick onboarding, especially if you operate a small property or a handful of units, Roomsy’s minimalism might appeal. However, given the lack of recent reviews and limited feature set, Cloudbeds is the more reliable and proven option for most hoteliers seeking growth.
Hoteliers with more than 10 rooms, multiple locations, or an ambition to expand should go with Cloudbeds. Smaller properties or startups that want a straightforward system for daily operations may find Roomsy sufficient — but even then, Cloudbeds’s extensive support and proven results make it the safer investment.
Based on the review data, Cloudbeds scores 4.61/5 for ease of use, supported by over 1,000 recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and mobile accessibility. Guests of Cloudbeds note that staff can quickly adapt, and its mobile app is well-regarded, making daily management more manageable.
Roomsy’s UI isn't rated publicly, but its core mission emphasizes simplicity for hoteliers, backed by its small team and focus on straightforward operations. Still, without recent reviews, it’s difficult to gauge real-world adoption and support.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 64 unique features, including channel management, revenue management, automated night audit, integrated CRM, guest messaging, and numerous integrations like payment processing and Kiosk check-in. These tools support complex workflows, multi-property management, and revenue optimization.
Roomsy offers the basics: reservations, housekeeping, billing, and some automation, but lacks the depth and breadth of Cloudbeds. Its feature set is designed for smaller, less complex properties that need reliable core functions without the extras.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support scores 4.41/5, with reviews consistently highlighting responsive, knowledgeable assistance and proactive onboarding—especially critical during initial setup. Users report that Cloudbeds’ support team is quick to resolve issues and offers extensive resources.
Roomsy’s support and customer feedback aren’t as well-documented publicly, but given its smaller size and niche focus, it’s unlikely to match Cloudbeds’s scale and responsiveness. For a property that values dependable, rapid support, Cloudbeds clearly leads.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds connects with 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment providers, and automation tools, offering extensive third-party integration. Shared partners like SiteMinder, and many unique ones, give properties flexibility and scalability.
Roomsy’s integration count is limited (only 2 verified partners), primarily focusing on essential booking and payment systems. For properties that rely on diverse tools and channels, Cloudbeds provides far more options.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds enjoys a 4.63/5 overall rating from over 1,000 recent reviews, with hoteliers across segments praising its usability, support, and feature depth. Boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties particularly appreciate its versatility and mobile access.
Roomsy, lacking substantial review data, cannot be directly rated. Its simplicity may satisfy smaller properties, but it doesn’t match Cloudbeds’s proven satisfaction scores and extensive use across segments.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s pricing starts at $600 monthly, with no free tier or trial. This fee includes full access to its many features, support, and integrations.
Roomsy’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, but it’s implied to be more affordable—likely due to its limited feature set. However, the lack of transparency makes it hard to evaluate value compared to Cloudbeds’s proven ROI.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds is the more comprehensive, scalable platform with a proven track record of high ratings, extensive features, and a large user base. Its ability to connect with over 190 partners and support complex operations makes it ideal for ambitious hotels and property groups.
Roomsy offers a straightforward, reliable solution tailored for small, simple properties with minimal needs. Its limited features and integration options make it less suitable for growth-focused hotels but perfect for those prioritizing ease of use.
Choosing Cloudbeds means investing in a platform that can grow with your hotel, backed by a large support network and proven success stories. Roomsy might serve a quick-start property well but falls short for properties aiming to scale or optimize revenue extensively.
In conclusion, if your team seeks a trusted, feature-rich PMS with recent positive reviews and extensive support, Cloudbeds is the clear recommendation. For small, budget-conscious properties with basic needs, Roomsy could be sufficient—though it’s less proven at scale.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Roomsy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roomsy 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。Roomsy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Roomsy 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问