The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 表现出色 .
Infor 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 47 |
在分析了 47 条经验证的评价后,CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 用户最看重其 ,而 Infor 用户则强调 易于使用, 报告, 一体化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
报告
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化
▾
|
|
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持
▾
|
|
|
−
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
−
更新问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #44 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #25 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #19 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #24 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #28 24 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 26 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #31 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #22 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #24 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #28 1 条评价 |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is pivotal for your hotel's operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) and Infor HMS aim to simplify your workflows, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and user experience. While CMS Hospitality’s platform is newer with limited recent reviews, Infor boasts a robust, well-supported product with a large user base and extensive integrations. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
Both CMS Hospitality and Infor HMS are designed to streamline hotel operations, from reservations to reporting. CMS Hospitality, with nearly no recent reviews and a smaller footprint, claims to provide enterprise-level solutions with 30 years’ industry experience, focusing on reliability and support. Conversely, Infor offers a mature, cloud-based system with a strong global presence, boasting a comprehensive feature set including housekeeping, revenue management, and mobile support.
CMS Hospitality’s limited review data makes it difficult to gauge current user satisfaction, whereas Infor’s 46 recent reviews and a high 4.04/5 overall rating reveal consistent, positive feedback. Hoteliers often cite ease of use and support responsiveness with Infor; CMS Hospitality’s recent user experiences are less visible, raising questions about ongoing satisfaction. Do you prioritize a proven, data-backed platform, or are you open to emerging solutions with fewer recent reviews?
If your hotel needs a flexible, enterprise-level PMS with a long industry track record and active support, Infor is the clear choice. It is best suited for hotels seeking extensive features like housekeeping, revenue management, multi-lingual support, and integrations with over 100 partners, making it ideal for mid-sized to large properties.
If your hotel is smaller, or you value a more personalized, less complex solution, CMS Hospitality could fit—although the lack of recent reviews and limited feature info is a concern. It might serve properties that need core management tools without extensive customization, but be cautious if you require proven scalability or extensive integrations. Overall, Infor’s proven presence and broad feature set make it the more reliable option for most hotels.
Infor’s user interface scores close to 3.88/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive navigation and quick onboarding, especially for staff accustomed to modern, web-based platforms. Support ratings are strong at 4.04/5, with reviewers emphasizing prompt, helpful assistance, and onboarding typically takes about 3.64/5.
CMS Hospitality, on the other hand, scores 0/5 across all ease-of-use metrics, with no recent reviews to confirm current usability. Historically, it’s positioned as a reliable enterprise system, but with minimal recent user feedback, its ease of adoption remains unverified. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor boasts 20 unique features, including housekeeping modules, online support, guest profiles, calendar views, direct billing, multi-currency, revenue management, and automated night audits. These functionalities are designed to cover comprehensive hotel operations and offer customization through reports and user roles.
CMS Hospitality provides no additional features beyond core PMS functions, relying on its integrated enterprise-level solutions, which may lack some specialized modules that Infor offers. Its limited feature set indicates a focus on fundamental management functions rather than advanced operational tools. Edge: Infor HMS.
Based on available data, Infor’s customer support scores 4.04/5, with reviews praising their responsiveness and professionalism, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Support staff are known to guide users effectively through issues, which is critical for minimizing downtime.
CMS Hospitality’s support ratings are unreported, and with no recent reviews, it’s unclear whether their support meets current industry standards. Given Infor’s extensive support network and ongoing customer satisfaction, it’s the safer choice for reliable assistance. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor offers 113 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, Revinate, Duetto, and Cendyn, covering booking engines, revenue tools, and guest analytics. These integrations enable a more connected, automated hotel operation.
CMS Hospitality supports just 12 verified partners, including some key players like Sage and STAAH, but with fewer options overall. The limited integrations may restrict your ability to connect all your operational tools efficiently. Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 recent reviews, Infor’s users rate it at 4.04/5, with many praising its comprehensive features and ease of use across hotel types, especially mid-sized and larger properties. Smaller and boutique hotels also appreciate its scalability.
CMS Hospitality’s review data is nonexistent, thus lacking recent feedback or ratings. Without current user experience data, it’s difficult to recommend it confidently. Given the strong recent ratings, Infor’s reputation is clearly more trusted. Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for both systems are not publicly disclosed. Typically, these platforms involve custom quotes based on hotel size, feature needs, and implementation scope. Expect to negotiate based on your hotel’s specific requirements.
Not ideal if your hotel demands advanced features like revenue management or extensive automation, as CMS Hospitality offers a more basic feature set.
Small boutique properties or those with limited IT support might find Infor’s comprehensive features overwhelming or unnecessary.
The core difference is that Infor offers a mature, feature-rich platform with a strong global presence, extensive integrations, and high user satisfaction. CMS Hospitality, while promising, currently has limited recent data and feature info, making it less reliable for most hotels.
Choose Infor if your hotel needs a proven, scalable system that supports complex operations and extensive integrations. Its widespread support, recent positive reviews, and comprehensive features make it the safer, more dependable choice.
Opt for CMS Hospitality if your property is smaller, less complex, and you value a solution with a long industry history—though be cautious about the lack of recent reviews and limited features. Its future performance remains less certain without current user feedback.
This comprehensive comparison aims to help you make an informed decision aligned with your hotel’s size, complexity, and operational needs. Prioritize systems with recent, positive reviews and features that match your strategic goals.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 和 Infor HMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 和 Infor HMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 提供 12 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor HMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix):否。Infor HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) 的 HT Score 为 0,Infor 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问