The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 172 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Sample PMS 表现出色 .
Exely 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Post-stay emails.
基于 HTR 上 172 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 172 |
在分析了 172 条经验证的评价后,Sample PMS 用户最看重其 ,而 Exely 用户则强调 支持与响应, 预订引擎效率, 直接预订增强。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持与响应
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎效率
▾
|
|
|
+
直接预订增强
▾
|
|
|
+
通道管理器同步
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
集成和高级功能
▾
|
|
|
−
宾客体验问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 34 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #46 0 条评价 | #11 64 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #15 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #15 28 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #50 0 条评价 | #16 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #16 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #24 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #25 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #4 79 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #2 17 条评价 |
Choosing between Sample PMS and Exely for your hotel’s booking engine hinges on what your property needs most. Both aim to improve your direct booking rates, but Sample PMS’s offering is virtually nonexistent in reviews and features, making it difficult to evaluate. Exely, on the other hand, is highly rated, with more recent reviews, a broader feature set, and a proven track record with hotels worldwide. Which platform aligns best with your hotel’s goals?
Sample PMS’s zero reviews and ratings suggest it’s untested in real hotel settings, while Exely’s 144 reviews and a near-perfect NPS score of 9.73/10 clearly demonstrate its strong market presence and customer satisfaction. Are you comfortable adopting a platform with no user feedback, or do you prefer a solution backed by dozens of recent hotel owners?
Sample PMS’s lack of reviews and a 0/5 overall rating indicate it’s unproven as a booking engine. Conversely, Exely has earned a 92.67/100 HTR Score with 144 reviews, all within the last six months, signifying active use and ongoing support.
Sample PMS’s total absence of features and integrations raises concerns about its capabilities, while Exely offers 29 unique features, including multi-lingual support, multi-currency, automated reporting, and booking abandonment tools—attributes that directly impact revenue and guest experience.
If your hotel needs a reliable, well-supported booking engine, Exely clearly outshines Sample PMS. Given the data, which product do you trust to deliver measurable results?
Sample PMS’s UI/UX ratings are nonexistent, and with no recent reviews, onboarding details are unavailable, offering no evidence it’s user-friendly. In contrast, Exely boasts a 4.91/5 ease of use rating, with recent reviews praising its simple dashboard, fast setup, and proactive support team.
Exely’s onboarding process is rated at 4.84/5, with users highlighting how quickly they got up and running and appreciated the ongoing support from the vendor. The consistent positive feedback indicates Exely is the easier solution to adopt and operate daily.
Edge: Exely.
Sample PMS offers no features documented in the review data, raising doubts about its capabilities. Exely, however, provides a comprehensive suite with 29 unique features, including responsive design, multi-room bookings, flexible rates, booking abandonment tools, and integrated payment options like PayPal, Stripe, and PayU.
These features directly support increasing conversions, simplifying management, and enhancing the guest experience—elements that can significantly impact your bottom line. The gap in features makes Exely the clear choice for hotels seeking a robust booking platform.
Edge: Exely.
Sample PMS’s support ratings are unavailable, and with no reviews, it’s impossible to gauge responsiveness or quality. Exely’s support is rated 4.96/5, with recent reviews emphasizing prompt responses, friendly communication, and proactive issue resolution.
Guests consistently mention how Exely’s support team helps them optimize their booking process, leading to smoother operations. For a hotel prioritizing dependable, high-quality support, Exely’s rating makes it the better choice.
Edge: Exely.
Sample PMS shows no verified partners or integrations, limiting its potential to connect with other hotel systems or third-party tools. Exely, on the other hand, offers eight verified partners, including major solutions like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Booking.com.
This broad integration ecosystem allows your team to streamline operations across distribution, PMS, and revenue management systems. If seamless connectivity is essential for your hotel, Exely’s integrations give it a significant advantage.
Edge: Exely.
Sample PMS’s ratings are nonexistent, indicating no hotel feedback or recent reviews. Exely’s reviews, by contrast, are overwhelmingly positive, with a 9.73/10 NPS score from 144 reviews within the last six months, and a 98% likelihood to recommend.
Hotels across various segments, including boutique and city center properties, praise Exely for its ease of use, support, and feature set. Given the recent, high-quality feedback, Exely clearly earns higher ratings from hoteliers.
Edge: Exely.
Sample PMS’s pricing details are unavailable, leaving potential buyers in the dark about costs or contract terms. Exely charges $200 per month with no mention of setup fees or trial options, making it transparent and straightforward.
While the price may seem high for some smaller properties, its feature set and support justify the investment. For clear, predictable pricing, Exely is the preferred choice.
Sample PMS may appeal to:
Not ideal if:
Exely suits:
Not ideal if:
The core difference boils down to proven performance versus an untested platform. Sample PMS offers no reviews, no clear features, and no support data, making it an uncertain choice that may not meet your hotel’s needs.
Exely, with its high ratings, extensive features, and recent positive reviews, stands out as the safer, more effective solution. If your goal is to increase direct bookings, streamline operations, and work with a vendor that understands your industry, Exely is the clear winner.
Choose Exely if you want a reliable, feature-rich platform that’s already proven to deliver results. Opt for Sample PMS only if you’re prepared for risk and willing to invest in unverified technology.
This analysis is based solely on available review data, feature listings, and market presence. Always conduct direct vendor discussions and demos to confirm suitability.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Codebranch Booking Engine Test 和 Exely Booking Engine 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 转化率报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 17 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Exely 的支持团队以其快速响应和以解决方案为导向的服务而备受赞誉,从而显著提升了用户体验。这被视为该产品的一大优势。
Exely的预订引擎因其用户友好性、运行速度快以及显著提升直接预订量的能力而备受赞誉,从而有助于收入增长。它被认为对提升宾客体验和转化率具有强大的积极影响... Exely的预订引擎因其用户友好性、运行速度快以及显著提升直接预订量的能力而备受赞誉,从而有助于收入增长。它被认为对提升宾客体验和转化率具有强大的积极影响。
该软件因增加直接预订量并降低对在线旅行社 (OTA) 的依赖而备受赞誉。这通过降低第三方费用和高效的预订管理带来投资回报,从而对酒店收入产生积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户反复反映的一个关键问题是自定义选项有限,尤其是在报表和网站设计方面。用户希望能够更灵活地调整模板和报表,以满足自身需求。
用户希望看到与其他酒店管理系统的集成能力得到提升。目前的集成限制被视为一个缺点,制约了平台全部潜力的发挥。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Codebranch Booking Engine Test 和 Exely Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Codebranch Booking Engine Test 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Booking Engine 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Codebranch Booking Engine Test:否。Exely Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Sample PMS 的 HT Score 为 0,Exely 的为 93。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问