The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 92 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Concilio Labs (Guest Score) 表现出色 在 宾客偏好和个性化 方面 .
Hapi 表现出色 在 onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Pace, Sales Activity, and GRC Reporting and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 92 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,400/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 26 | 66 |
在分析了 92 条经验证的评价后,Concilio Labs (Guest Score) 用户最看重其 宾客偏好和个性化, 主动宾客管理, 详细反馈收集,而 Hapi 用户则强调 特定系统连接, 实施与支持, 集成简化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
宾客偏好和个性化
▾
|
+
特定系统连接
▾
|
|
+
主动宾客管理
▾
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
|
+
详细反馈收集
▾
|
+
集成简化
▾
|
|
+
可用性和用户界面
▾
|
+
灵活性和定制化
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
运营效率
▾
|
−
关于定制开发的负面反馈
▾
|
|
−
与 PMS 集成
▾
|
|
|
−
需要增强集成
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 5 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #13 14 条评价 | #10 22 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | #4 32 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #17 1 条评价 | #8 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #23 4 条评价 | #8 33 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 26 条评价 | #6 45 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 8 条评价 | #6 38 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #23 1 条评价 | #12 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #2 38 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #27 17 条评价 | #13 15 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #15 4 条评价 | #3 12 条评价 |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | #8 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Concilio Labs’ Guest Score and Hapi Guest hinges on your hotel’s priorities for guest data management and integration. Both aim to improve guest engagement with CRM and marketing tools, but they approach these goals differently. Concilio offers a more streamlined, analytics-driven CRM with limited integrations, while Hapi provides a broad, Salesforce-powered platform with extensive system connectivity. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s operational goals?
Both products aim to enhance guest relationships through data insights and personalized communication. Concilio’s platform emphasizes a rich, cloud-based guest profile and actionable insights, designed for hotels that want a detailed understanding of their guests. Hapi, on the other hand, excels at integrating multiple operational systems into one profile, making it ideal if seamless system connectivity is your priority. But with more recent reviews and a higher user rating, Hapi’s market presence suggests it may serve your hotel better in today’s tech environment.
If your hotel needs a highly connected system that consolidates data from multiple PMS, POS, and CRM platforms, Hapi is the clear choice. Its 66 verified integrations and Salesforce foundation make it ideal for multi-property, tech-savvy hotels seeking operational efficiency. Conversely, if your focus is on gaining detailed guest insights, tailored messaging, and a straightforward user experience, Concilio’s more limited but highly-rated platform might suit you better. The decision largely depends on whether system integration or guest data depth is your top priority.
Concilio’s intuitive design and onboarding score a 4.3/5, with users appreciating its user-friendly interface and simple data collection processes. However, some mention that manual data entry into PMS remains a challenge, indicating room for improvement. Hapi’s ease of use is slightly higher at 4.64/5, bolstered by its quick deployment and straightforward integration process, with many users describing support as “knowledgeable and responsive.” Edge: Hapi.
Hapi’s platform offers a suite of 30 features, including data migration, event automation, segmentation, email templates, loyalty segmentation, and GDPR compliance—features that Concilio does not list. Concilio’s core strength lies in its comprehensive guest profiles and insights engine, providing personalized recommendations and guest understanding. But Hapi’s extensive feature set, especially for marketing automation and multi-channel engagement, gives it a significant edge. Edge: Hapi.
Hapi’s customer support scores 4.83/5, with reviews praising their knowledgeable team and smooth onboarding. Users commend their responsiveness, especially during implementation, describing support as “fantastic” and “a true partner.” Concilio’s support ratings are slightly lower at 4.56/5, with some reviews indicating a need for better PMS integration support. Given recent reviews and higher scores, Hapi’s support is the stronger choice. Edge: Hapi.
Hapi’s platform boasts 66 verified integrations, including common partners like Infor and Shiji, plus many unique ones such as 4SUITES and Volo. Concilio only has 2 verified partners, with notable mention of attempted integrations but limited breadth overall. For hotels that rely on multiple operational systems, Hapi’s extensive connectivity offers a distinct advantage. Edge: Hapi.
Hapi’s recent reviews and 52 hotel segment-specific ratings average 4.85/5, with high marks from independent and branded hotels. Concilio, with only 25 reviews and a guest score of 14.5/25, averages a much lower rating of 0/5, indicating poor recent feedback or possible data inaccuracies. Given the higher recent review volume and ratings, Hapi is clearly the hotter, more highly-rated platform among hoteliers today.
Concilio does not list specific pricing, which suggests a bespoke quote or possible higher investment. Hapi charges a flat fee of $1,400 monthly, with no implied setup or additional costs. For budget-conscious hotels or those seeking predictable expenses, Hapi’s transparent pricing makes planning easier.
Concilio Labs offers a guest-centric CRM with a focus on insights, personalization, and feedback, making it suited for hotels emphasizing guest experience. However, its limited integrations and lower recent review volume weaken its appeal in a highly connected, modern hotel environment.
Hapi, with its 66 integrations, Salesforce backing, and extensive feature set, stands out as a versatile, scalable solution. Its higher review scores, recent positive feedback, and broad system connectivity favor hotels seeking operational efficiency and marketing automation.
If your hotel prioritizes guest insights and personalized communication with less emphasis on system integration, choose Concilio. But if you require a comprehensive, connected platform capable of supporting multiple operational systems and automation, Hapi is the better choice.
酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,400/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Concilio Labs 和 Hapi Guest 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 客人资料 | ||
| 数据迁移服务 | ||
| 联系人管理 | ||
| 速度、销售活动和 GRC 报告 | ||
| 集中式多酒店/多品牌解决方案 | ||
| 集中式数据仓库 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 18 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 Concilio 能够在客人抵达前收集和分析详细的客人偏好,从而提供个性化和卓越的客人服务。这包括自动发送电子邮件以及链接以前的入住反馈以定制未来... 用户经常称赞 Concilio 能够在客人抵达前收集和分析详细的客人偏好,从而提供个性化和卓越的客人服务。这包括自动发送电子邮件以及链接以前的入住反馈以定制未来体验的能力。
用户很欣赏在客人抵达之前收集客人信息并采取行动的功能,这样可以更好地管理客人的期望并提供更主动的服务,从而提升整体客人体验。
用户发现 Concilio 通过入住前、入住中和入住后调查收集的结构化反馈具有巨大价值。这有助于及时采取行动,提高客人满意度和服务质量。不过,一些人建议整合入住... 用户发现 Concilio 通过入住前、入住中和入住后调查收集的结构化反馈具有巨大价值。这有助于及时采取行动,提高客人满意度和服务质量。不过,一些人建议整合入住中和入住后调查分数,以获得更全面的视角。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Concilio 可减少手动流程并让员工专注于高价值任务,从而提高运营效率。然而,缺乏与消息传递系统等其他工具的直接集成是一个需要改进的领域。
许多用户呼吁改进 Concilio 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 之间的集成。投诉包括手动数据输入以及由于缺乏与 PMS 的无缝同步而导致的信息丢失风险。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
一些批评性反馈涉及 Hapi 需要将连接扩展到 PMS 之外的更多操作系统,包括桌面管理、CRM、POS 和 Spa 系统。
许多用户对实施阶段的快速高效支持表示赞赏。他们发现 Hapi 团队知识渊博、反应迅速,使集成过程顺利且轻松。不过,有些人建议在定制开发方面有所改进。
大多数用户强调,Hapi 简化了不同物业管理系统和第三方应用程序之间的集成,减少了与集成任务相关的时间和成本。它提供了统一的数据存储库,使酒店能够更快、更... 大多数用户强调,Hapi 简化了不同物业管理系统和第三方应用程序之间的集成,减少了与集成任务相关的时间和成本。它提供了统一的数据存储库,使酒店能够更快、更高效地部署技术。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户表示,Hapi 倾向于回避定制开发工作,这可能是特定酒店集成要求的限制。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Concilio Labs 和 Hapi Guest 共享许多核心 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 功能,但各有独特的能力。Concilio Labs 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hapi Guest 提供 65 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Concilio Labs 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Concilio Labs:否。Hapi Guest:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Concilio Labs (Guest Score) 的 HT Score 为 15,Hapi 的为 31。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问