The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 224 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Fideltour 表现出色 .
dailypoint™ 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Event Based Automations.
基于 HTR 上 224 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 224 |
在分析了 224 条经验证的评价后,Fideltour 用户最看重其 ,而 dailypoint™ 用户则强调 支持服务, 营销自动化, 配置文件引擎。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Fideltour |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持服务
▾
|
|
|
+
营销自动化
▾
|
|
|
+
配置文件引擎
▾
|
|
|
+
电子邮件营销
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制复杂性
▾
|
|
|
−
系统性能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Fideltour |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 25 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 149 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 34 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 12 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Fideltour |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 106 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #1 133 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #1 71 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #4 13 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Fideltour |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #20 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 195 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #5 7 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #2 15 条评价 |
Choosing between Fideltour's CRM and dailypoint™ 360° hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for guest data management, marketing automation, and integration capacity. Fideltour aims to serve smaller, less complex hotel operations, offering basic customer management with limited reviews or recent activity. In contrast, dailypoint™ boasts a high score, extensive recent reviews, and a broad feature set, making it a more mature choice for data-driven hotels. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s growth ambitions?
Both products address guest data collection and communication, but their scope and sophistication differ significantly. Fideltour's limited features and lack of recent review activity signal a less active user base, while dailypoint™'s vibrant community and ongoing development reflect a more evolved platform. Are you ready to invest in a system that actively supports your evolving CRM needs?
Fideltour and dailypoint™ both claim to enhance guest relationships through data, but their implementations reveal stark differences. Fideltour's score of 0/5 and no recent reviews suggest minimal recent engagement, indicating limited ongoing support or development. Meanwhile, dailypoint™ scores 4.53/5 with over 149 recent reviews, showing consistent user satisfaction and active updates.
Fideltour's reviews are scarce and lack recent feedback, making it difficult to assess current usability or support quality. dailypoint™, however, is praised for its ability to centralize guest data from 200+ sources, support personalized marketing, and automate guest communication—features that significantly impact modern hotel marketing strategies. Do you need a platform that evolves with your hotel’s needs?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable CRM with extensive integrations, automation, and data management, dailypoint™ is the clear choice. Its robust feature set—28 unique functionalities including AI-driven guest profiles, segmentation, and automation—supports large and complex operations aiming for data-driven guest engagement.
Conversely, if your hotel operates on a smaller scale, with minimal integration needs and a focus on basic guest communication, Fideltour might suffice. However, given the lack of recent reviews and zero rating in user satisfaction, its suitability is questionable. For most hotels looking to grow or improve personalization, dailypoint™ offers proven value and ongoing support.
dailypoint™ scores a 4.15/5 for ease of use, backed by recent reviews praising its user-friendly interface, manageable onboarding, and supportive customer service. Users highlight its straightforward processes for managing guest data and automations, even amid its extensive features.
Fideltour, with a 0/5 rating in ease of use and no recent reviews, offers no clear evidence of a user-friendly experience. Its lack of recent activity and support updates suggest it may be outdated or difficult for staff to adopt effectively. Edge: dailypoint™.
dailypoint™ provides 28 features, including centralized multi-system data, guest profiles, segmentation, automation, loyalty modules, GDPR compliance, and open API integrations. These capabilities support personalized marketing, operational automation, and detailed guest insights—features absent in Fideltour, which has no unique or advanced features listed.
Fideltour’s simplicity might appeal to very small properties, but it lacks the extensive automation, data cleansing, and segmentation features that are critical for modern hospitality marketing. The edge clearly goes to dailypoint™ for its richer feature set that aligns with current industry standards.
dailypoint™’s support scores 4.51/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness, helpfulness, and ongoing development. Users note its flexibility and quick adjustments to customer feedback, reflecting a dedicated support team.
Fideltour’s support score is zero, with no recent reviews or data to assess support quality. Its lack of recent activity and reviews suggest support may be limited or outdated. Edge: dailypoint™.
dailypoint™ boasts 59 verified partners, including prominent integrations like hotelkit, apaleo, Customer Alliance, and Xn protel Systems. Its open API and extensive partner network enable seamless data flow and operational links across platforms.
Fideltour shows no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems and tools. For a connected, data-rich environment, dailypoint™ is the clear winner. Edge: dailypoint™.
dailypoint™ holds a high rating of 4.53/5 based on 149 recent reviews, with users praising its functionality, support, and ability to handle complex data. Hospitality segments like luxury hotels, resorts, and independents rate it at about 4.5/5, showing broad appeal.
Fideltour’s rating is 0/5 with no recent reviews, indicating no recent user feedback or active user base. Hotels seeking proven, high-rated solutions should favor dailypoint™. Edge: dailypoint™.
Fideltour's pricing details are not publicly available, likely indicating a bespoke or less transparent model. In contrast, dailypoint™ charges a base price of $600/month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its premium positioning.
Given the high adoption among large hotel groups and extensive features, dailypoint™’s pricing aligns with its enterprise-grade capabilities. The lack of publicly available cost details for Fideltour suggests it may be less scalable or flexible for larger operations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in scope and sophistication: Fideltour offers a basic CRM experience that may suit very small properties or those with minimal needs, but it lacks recent activity or reviews, signaling limited support and development. dailypoint™, with its extensive feature set, active user base, and high satisfaction scores, caters to hotels seeking a data-driven approach to guest engagement.
If your hotel is looking to grow, automate, and leverage guest data at scale, dailypoint™ provides a proven platform with continuous updates and strong support. For smaller, less complex properties, Fideltour might seem simpler, but the lack of recent reviews and features could limit its long-term value.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming for a modern, integrated CRM that enhances guest experiences and supports growth, dailypoint™ is the more reliable and feature-rich choice. If your operation is very small and basic, and you’ve already evaluated the limited scope of Fideltour, it might suffice—but beware of its outdated status and unverified support standing.
酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Fideltour |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CRM 和 dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Fideltour |
|
|---|---|---|
| 个性化一对一沟通 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 所见即所得 - HTML 编辑器 | ||
| 模板编辑器 | ||
| 集中式多酒店/多品牌解决方案 | ||
| 集中式数据仓库 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 16 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"So, as you think about investing in Digital Hospitality, don‘t forget to think about what it might cost not to!"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We work with dailypoint because the integration between the Booking Manager module and our PMS works really well."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The decisive factor for selecting dailypoint was their wide experience in customer loyalty programs, their high standards in GDPR as well as their ability to connect partner system..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然客户支持因其响应迅速和高效而普遍受到好评,但一些用户提到,与其他提供商相比,支持服务的成本较高,这是一个缺点。
Dailypoint 的自动化功能获得了积极的反馈,尤其是在设置有针对性的群组特定自动化活动、简化营销工作和提高工作流程效率方面。
用户重视用户画像引擎,因为它能够从多个来源挖掘相关的宾客兴趣,从而构建更丰富的宾客画像。这项功能有助于精准的宾客细分和互动,为个性化营销活动带来战略优... 用户重视用户画像引擎,因为它能够从多个来源挖掘相关的宾客兴趣,从而构建更丰富的宾客画像。这项功能有助于精准的宾客细分和互动,为个性化营销活动带来战略优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然功能丰富,但自定义设置较为复杂,一些用户反映难以根据自身需求定制特定报告。这表明该领域仍有改进空间,可以提升用户体验。
有用户反映导航过程中系统运行缓慢,这表明提高速度可以提升用户的整体满意度和效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CRM 和 dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management 共享许多核心 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 功能,但各有独特的能力。CRM 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management 提供 59 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CRM:否。dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Fideltour 的 HT Score 为 0,dailypoint™ 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问