The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 129 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
FastBooking 表现出色 .
Exely 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
基于 HTR 上 129 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 129 |
在分析了 129 条经验证的评价后,FastBooking 用户最看重其 ,而 Exely 用户则强调 channel manager integration and synchronization, 用户界面和可用性, 支持与响应。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| FastBooking |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Channel Manager Integration and Synchronization
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
支持与响应
▾
|
|
|
+
直接预订增强
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
分析与报告
▾
|
|
|
−
自定义和控制
▾
|
|
|
−
集成灵活性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | FastBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 51 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | FastBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #15 29 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #13 27 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #15 14 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #14 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | FastBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #18 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #19 10 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #5 67 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #7 13 条评价 |
As a hotelier evaluating channel management tools, you're weighing CRS FastBooking.com and Exely Channel Manager. Both aim to streamline your bookings and online distribution, but they approach these goals differently. FastBooking offers a central reservation system with limited recent user feedback, while Exely specializes in channel management with a robust review base and recent positive feedback. Which platform aligns better with your current needs and future growth?
FastBooking's CRS aims to unify reservations, increase booking efficiency, and provide insights across your property’s operations. However, it has no recent reviews, and its zero-star rating suggests limited recent user feedback. Meanwhile, Exely boasts over 100 recent reviews with a 4.95/5 ease of use score, emphasizing its focus on channel management.
Exely's reviews highlight increased revenue, reduced manual work, and a highly intuitive interface—features that make managing multiple channels easier. FastBooking’s lack of recent reviews makes it difficult to assess its current performance or customer satisfaction. Given the data, Exely appears more reliable and proven in recent hotel operations.
If your hotel needs a proven, user-friendly channel management solution with extensive integrations and recent positive reviews, go with Exely. Its 102 reviews, mainly from diverse property types, show high satisfaction, especially in improving operational efficiency and revenue.
If your hotel is seeking an all-in-one reservation platform with centralized booking management, and you value a long-standing CRS, then FastBooking might be worth exploring, but the lack of recent feedback makes it a less certain choice. For most hotels, especially those prioritizing recent customer satisfaction, Exely is the safer bet.
FastBooking scores 0/5 for ease of use, with no recent reviews to validate usability or onboarding experience. Its unclear interface and potential complexity could hinder staff adoption. Conversely, Exely consistently receives a 4.95/5 score for ease of use, backed by multiple recent reviews praising its intuitive, user-friendly platform and straightforward setup.
Reviewers describe Exely as “easy to navigate,” “saving time,” and “helping staff manage bookings seamlessly.” Edge: Exely.
FastBooking offers no specific features listed, indicating limited or no recent feature updates. Exely provides 13 distinct features, such as channel self-mapping, derived rates, weekly/monthly rate support, inventory management, bulk updates, real-time integration, multi-lingual and multi-currency support, payment processing, centralized user roles, analytics dashboards, and performance reporting.
Exely’s feature set directly addresses operational needs, providing tools to automate and customize rate and inventory management. Without comparable features listed for FastBooking, Exely’s feature depth clearly gives it an advantage. Edge: Exely.
FastBooking's support ratings are unavailable, and no recent reviews mention customer support experience. This makes it difficult to judge whether your hotel will receive timely, effective assistance. Conversely, Exely’s support scores a 4.95/5, with recent reviews praising responsiveness and professionalism.
Users describe Exely’s support as “quick to resolve issues” and “helpful in onboarding,” which is critical when implementing a new system. Given recent feedback, Exely’s support is more dependable. Edge: Exely.
FastBooking has no verified integration partners listed, suggesting limited or no current integrations with other systems. Exely, on the other hand, offers eight verified partners, including prominent platforms like Hotellab, Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Booking.com.
This allows for smoother operations and data flow across your property’s tech stack. With more verified integrations and active partner support, Exely enables a more connected workflow. Edge: Exely.
FastBooking’s lack of recent reviews makes it impossible to assess current user satisfaction, but the overall absence of recent feedback indicates a lower confidence level. Exely, with 34 recent reviews, maintains a 4.95/5 ease of use score and a 9.8/10 NPS, reflecting high satisfaction across varied property types.
Reviewers frequently praise Exely for its efficiency, ease of management, and positive impact on revenue. For recent, high-rated hotel experiences, Exely is clearly the stronger performer. Edge: Exely.
FastBooking does not list pricing details; it may require a custom quote or a prior inquiry. Exely charges $100 per month, with no hidden fees or per-room charges, making its pricing transparent and predictable.
Given the lack of publicly available data for FastBooking, Exely’s straightforward pricing model provides better clarity for budgeting and assessing value.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers real-time, flexible channel management or recent user feedback. It might also be less suitable for smaller properties or those new to technology.
Not ideal if your hotel needs an all-in-one reservation platform or lacks dedicated personnel for managing complex integrations.
The core difference lies in their focus: FastBooking centers on reservation management, while Exely specializes in channel distribution. If your hotel needs a proven channel management solution, Exely’s recent reviews, high satisfaction scores, and extensive features make it the clear choice.
Choose FastBooking if you want an all-in-one reservation system with centralized operations, but note its current lack of recent reviews and user feedback. For most hotels, particularly those emphasizing online distribution and revenue growth, Exely offers a more dependable, tested solution.
If you’re prioritizing ease of use, integration, and support, Exely outperforms FastBooking. Its recent review activity confirms it’s actively serving hotels’ needs today, making it the safer, smarter investment for your hotel’s distribution strategy.
渠道经理 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| FastBooking |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CRS FastBooking.com 和 Exely Channel Manager 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | FastBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 批量更新和多重限制 | ||
| 支持每周和每月费率 | ||
| 派生费率 | ||
| 通道自映射 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 1 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
The robust integration and synchronization abilities of Exely facilitate smooth channel management with minimal errors. Users commend how effectively... The robust integration and synchronization abilities of Exely facilitate smooth channel management with minimal errors. Users commend how effectively it connects with PMS and OTAs, though some desire improvements in certain PMS integrations.
Exely 的用户友好界面是其一大优势,方便酒店员工管理日常运营。然而,部分用户建议进一步进行定制和现代化改造,以提升用户体验。
Exely 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而备受赞誉,从而确保了服务的可靠性。然而,一些用户建议在高峰时段响应速度可以更快一些。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Exely 提供了重要的绩效洞察,但用户表示需要更详细、可定制的报告选项,以便更好地分析渠道有效性并推动战略决策。
尽管 Exely 为预订规则和促销活动提供了高级自定义选项,但一些用户希望网站模板和报告格式能有更灵活的设计选项。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CRS FastBooking.com 和 Exely Channel Manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。CRS FastBooking.com 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Channel Manager 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CRS FastBooking.com:否。Exely Channel Manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。FastBooking 的 HT Score 为 0,Exely 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问