The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 249 条经验证的评价后,D-Edge 用户最看重其 客户支持, 易于使用和直观的界面, 费率管理和优化工具,而 ROIBACK 用户则强调 支持和客户服务, 直接预订优化, 技术改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
支持和客户服务
▾
|
|
+
易于使用和直观的界面
▾
|
+
直接预订优化
▾
|
|
+
费率管理和优化工具
▾
|
+
技术改进
▾
|
|
+
渠道整合和 OTA
▾
|
+
灵活性和定制化
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
同步问题
▾
|
−
多语言和用户友好界面
▾
|
|
−
用户自主和定制
▾
|
−
支付网关
▾
|
|
−
价格和价值问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 68 条评价 | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #8 86 条评价 | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 32 条评价 | #14 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #17 3 条评价 | #10 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #10 71 条评价 | #24 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 56 条评价 | #23 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | #18 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #11 16 条评价 | #19 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #40 1 条评价 | #18 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 139 条评价 | #20 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #8 43 条评价 | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #26 5 条评价 | #14 3 条评价 |
When selecting a booking engine for your hotel, your goal is to boost direct bookings, streamline operations, and enhance guest experience. Both D-Edge and Roiback address these needs, but they do so through different strengths and user experiences. D-Edge, with its extensive integration and a broad feature set, is favored by hotels seeking a robust, European-based platform. Roiback, with a higher recent review count and a focus on international support, is often preferred by hotels looking for flexibility and proven revenue growth. Which aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
D-Edge’s platform is designed to maximize direct bookings through its powerful rate management tools, seamless OTA integrations, and marketing capabilities like geo-pricing and campaign manager. It is especially suitable if your hotel prioritizes sophisticated rate control and a comprehensive analytics suite. Conversely, Roiback emphasizes user experience, responsiveness, and a suite of features like loyalty programs and detailed reporting, which some hotels find more effective for increasing conversion and revenue. Given the significant difference in review counts—D-Edge with 184 reviews and Roiback with only 43—D-Edge’s more extensive feedback suggests more tested performance but also potentially more complexity.
D-Edge's reviews highlight ease of use, support, and consistent evolution, while some users cite synchronization issues and a complex campaign manager. Roiback’s recent reviews focus on its impact on revenue growth, support, and ease of multi-language use, but some note speed and integration issues. Do you need a platform with proven extensive regional presence or a solution praised for boosting revenue with more personalized support?
If your hotel needs a deeply integrated, feature-rich system with advanced rate and campaign management, go with D-Edge. Its 5 exclusive features—pooled inventory, automated reporting, various rate types, availability blocks, and event modules—offer comprehensive control and operational efficiencies.
If your focus is on increasing direct sales through a user-friendly interface, detailed analytics, and flexible marketing tools, Roiback is the better choice. It boasts a lower implementation complexity, proven revenue increases, and high support ratings, making it ideal for hotels that prioritize simplicity coupled with revenue growth.
Hotels that require precise rate control, advanced marketing features, and regional coverage should lean toward D-Edge. Conversely, properties seeking a straightforward, revenue-boosting solution with extensive support and international adaptability should choose Roiback.
D-Edge boasts an ease of use score of 4.6/5 based on user reviews, with many praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding experience (4.49/5). Its platform is described as user-friendly, even for high-level users managing complex rate structures, and its customer support is consistently rated highly. However, some users mention that certain features like the campaign manager could be more straightforward.
Roiback also scores highly for usability at 4.49/5 and benefits from its simple web interface, multi-language support, and effective onboarding (4.34/5). Its design supports international users well, but some reviews suggest that speed and interface fluidity could be improved.
Edge: D-Edge.
D-Edge offers 29 shared features plus 5 exclusive ones, including pooled inventory, automated reporting, and multiple rate types, making it highly versatile for complex rate management and marketing. Its additional modules for weddings and corporate bookings add further value for specific segments.
Roiback provides 29 shared features as well, with 7 exclusive features such as urgency messaging, booking abandonment recapture, and Facebook conversion tracking. Its feature set supports dynamic promotions and targeted marketing, although it lacks some of D-Edge’s advanced rate management tools.
Edge: D-Edge.
D-Edge’s support team earns a 4.57/5 rating, with reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness, especially in multilingual support. Users appreciate their quick problem resolution, but some note delays during peak times.
Roiback’s customer support scores slightly higher at 4.72/5, with reviews emphasizing its personalized, proactive consulting and responsiveness. Clients value its dedicated account managers and ongoing strategic advice, which have helped achieve revenue goals.
Edge: Roiback.
D-Edge boasts 115 verified partners, including key integrations like Priority Software, HOTELTIME, and Hotello, with 23 shared partners. Its broad integration network supports extensive channel and PMS connectivity, providing more options for complex properties.
Roiback has 27 verified partners, with 23 shared, including major channel managers like STAAH and Lighthouse. While it covers essential integrations, its partner count is smaller, which could limit options for hotels with niche or specific system needs.
Edge: D-Edge.
D-Edge has a significantly higher overall rating of 4.65/5 based on 184 reviews, with recent reviews emphasizing ease of use, support, and feature evolution. Its high NPS score of 9.09/10 indicates strong customer loyalty across segments, especially independent and boutique hotels.
Roiback, with only 43 reviews, has a lower rating of 0/5, which suggests either a lack of recent feedback or possible reporting issues. The few recent reviews focus on revenue growth and support, but the limited sample size makes it harder to gauge overall satisfaction.
Edge: D-Edge.
D-Edge pricing starts at $400 per month without a free trial, and there are no details about tiered packages or setup fees. Its pricing suggests a premium product aimed at hotels seeking extensive features.
Roiback’s base fee is $500 per month, also without a trial, with a similar absence of tiered options or setup fees. Its slightly higher price may reflect its focus on revenue growth and support services, but the value relative to features depends on your hotel’s specific needs.
D-Edge offers a comprehensive, highly customizable booking engine with extensive integrations and advanced features, making it ideal for large or complex properties. Its broad regional presence and numerous features support hotels with sophisticated distribution and marketing needs.
Roiback delivers a straightforward, revenue-focused solution praised for its support, ease of use, and proven ability to increase direct bookings. It is especially suited for hotels seeking quick growth, international reach, and a platform that’s easier to operate.
If your hotel values a feature-rich, scalable system with extensive integrations and regional coverage, D-Edge is the clear choice. If you prioritize boosting direct sales with a more intuitive interface and personalized support, Roiback should be your pick.
Overall, based on review volume and recency, D-Edge emerges as the more dependable long-term partner. Its larger and more recent feedback base indicates a more tested and trusted solution for diverse hotel needs.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然客户支持因其响应速度和专业性而受到普遍称赞,但一些评论提到解决问题时存在延迟。用户建议需要更及时地响应并扩大支持团队以迅速处理查询。
该平台的直观界面和用户友好设计被反复强调为主要优点。用户发现,即使功能复杂,导航和管理也十分方便,即使是不懂技术的员工也能轻松上手。
D-Edge 的价格管理工具(例如 Rate Screener 和 Little Yielder)因其易用性和优化定价策略的能力而广受好评。这些工具可帮助酒店经营者防止超额预订,并根据市... D-Edge 的价格管理工具(例如 Rate Screener 和 Little Yielder)因其易用性和优化定价策略的能力而广受好评。这些工具可帮助酒店经营者防止超额预订,并根据市场情况实时调整价格。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户报告了 D-Edge 与所连接 OTA 之间的同步问题,导致价格和可用性出现差异。这偶尔会导致超额预订并需要手动调整,这凸显了提高同步可靠性的必要性。
用户对 D-Edge 的用户友好界面表示赞赏,但也指出需要更大程度地自主调整设置,例如费率计划和频道映射。允许更多用户控制可以减少对变更支持的依赖。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。D-EDGE - Booking Engine 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。D-EDGE - Booking Engine 提供 115 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。D-EDGE - Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
D-EDGE - Booking Engine:否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。D-Edge 的 HT Score 为 34,ROIBACK 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问